Was rereading deltas and saw this image in drop 196
(Incase it does not embed above, here the link)
Look at the Y head.
Closely.
Now realize, that the mask is partially transparent, and that the camera flash shows the face underneath.
Then reconcile with the surrounding drops:
Click the image. Zoom in.
See through the mask.
WITAF are we even looking into the face of?
Public release of the image was a mistake -Q
I'm kind of done with little puzzles. If you have a point, spit it out in plain language.
Is not a puzzle.
The mask is a transparent metal wire mask.
The flash of the camera shines off the 'gold' skin on the face underneath.
It looks like a typical 'grey' alien heas shape with distinct eyes.
This photo is from the infamous Rothchild's Surrealist Ball, hosted on December 12, 1972, in their Château de Ferrières, Seine-et-Marne, France. The woman wearing the mask is Baroness Marie-Hélène de Rothschild (1927-1996), pictured holding hands with her husband Baron Guy de Rothschild (1909-2007). Here is her face without the mask at the Ball:
https://files.catbox.moe/lwuuft.jpg
I have spent some time looking for other angles of the mask to confirm if it is indeed transparent. I've only located one other angle, where it makes it difficult to tell. To me, the mask does look translucent around her eyes/nose and the flash exposed her.
https://files.catbox.moe/eyqrx1.jpg
Contrast corrected and b/w version to enhance the image: https://files.catbox.moe/rwlfaz.jpg
Here are more photos from the Surrealist Ball. They will turn your stomach:
The Illuminati Surrealist Ball: Extraordinarily Odd Photographs From A Rothschild Party In 1972 https://designyoutrust.com/2016/01/the-illuminati-surrealist-ball-extraordinarily-odd-photographs-from-a-rothschild-party-in-1972/
Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20210812193742/https://designyoutrust.com/2016/01/the-illuminati-surrealist-ball-extraordinarily-odd-photographs-from-a-rothschild-party-in-1972/
"The invitations were written backwards, forcing the guests to use the assistance of a mirror to read them. The distinguished guests including Salvador Dali and Audrey Hepburn were asked to wear 'black tie, long dresses and surrealists heads.'
Upon arrival, the facade of the chateau was lit in red with the effect of making it appear to be on fire. The guests had to walk through black ribbons that were meant to mimic cobwebs and a labyrinth maze before entering the ballroom."
More details about the Surrealist Ball:
Photos from a 1972 Rothschild illuminati party https://web.archive.org/web/20210228102645/http://www.hangthebankers.com/photos-from-a-1972-rothschild-illuminati-party/
History of Château de Ferrières, Seine-et-Marne, France https://family.rothschildarchive.org/estates/9-chateau-de-ferrieres
Stanley Kubrick's movie "Eyes Wide Shut," starring Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman, was largely based on the Surrealist Ball. Kubrick died suddenly and unexpectedly after completing the editing. It was re-edited after his death, and it is believed that 22 minutes of the film were removed.
The Hidden Messages in “Eyes Wide Shut” (3 part series) https://vigilantcitizen.com/moviesandtv/the-hidden-and-not-so-hidden-messages-in-stanley-kubriks-eyes-wide-shut-pt-i/
Also, for fun, DDG image search "Marie-Hélène de Rothschild" and see the numerous celebrities who kept company with her over the years. I spied Nancy Reagan.
Interesting thought. Yes, lots of birdcages at that party apparently. MK Ultra symbolism.
Top notch work. Thank you
Thanks!
Shit... this photos seem to corroborate what i was saying...
Wtf.
The face beneath isn't the unmasked face.
Those eyes. Very dark, mean, evil.
Too big too.
Look at her wrists/hands/fingers in her photos too. Odd.
https://files.catbox.moe/eyqrx1.jpg
https://files.catbox.moe/lwuuft.jpg
They remind me of Angelina Jolie's wrists/hands/fingers in this pic:
https://files.catbox.moe/lzjjrv.jpeg
Source: https://www.whowhatwear.com/angelina-jolie-wardrobe-basics/slide2
Looks like a demon. Many of these cult members shapeshift at will.
"I have spent some time looking for other angles of the mask to confirm if it is indeed transparent."
Transparent is probably not 100% accurate. Have you ever seen a mascot or Disney character up-close? They use really thin, stretchy fabric to hide the person underneath, but it still allows the person to see through the fabric. Someone viewing the character would have a hard time seeing the person inside because the person inside is in a darker environment than the person looking at the character. A camera flash, however, is bright enough to illuminate the person's face through the fabric.
Take a look at this mascot to see my point. The inside of the mouth is thin, black fabric:
https://2llk3o2hu5kh3x55zgezgg3h-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/Iceburgh_2008-scaled.jpg
Ok thank you friend for making your post more clear.
You are saying that the person in the antlers costume is a extraterrestrial.
That is definitely an interesting possibility.
I'm not saying that it IS, but mainly ststing that WITAF is behind that mask.
The shine off the dark eyes and gold skin and odd shaped head are freaky
The breast are unreal as well, not in the positive sense but looks like a Halloween costume.
I agree with you that the mask has transparency that I never noticed before.
I'm not mocking you for thinking that it might be an ET. I think you have noticed something and you might be right. We are living in a Clown World right now as we realize things are not like we thought they were, if that makes any sense.
Thanks for clearing it up. I can see it, but can still see how that might be part of the mask with a regular (err, mostly regular) human underneath. But it's weirder the more I look.
She looks normal here though:
https://onedio.com/haber/rothschild-ailesinin-1972-yilinda-verdigi-ve-aile-hakkindaki-komplo-teorilerini-guclendiren-ilginc-daveti-959679
Scroll down and you’ll see her without the mask.
Yeah I've seen this. Thanks.
Still doesn't explain why in the image Q posted, she looks non human, and why Q posted the things they did in and around that drop.
Like I mentioned in another comment, it's possible that it's an odd trick of lighting, but, it still looks really odd regardless
It does, I agree
I second this