Freemason symbols on what became the Iron Cross on the right (original Templar sigil used my numerous european/germanic groups and it eventually morphed into the Iron Cross). Knights Templar order had nothing to do with the Freemasons; and was disbanded centuries before they came around. Masons are/were just wannabe templars trying to ride the coattails of their success; and co-opted a bunch of their stuff. And you're right about the vatican and by extension the antipope. Many internal problems even beyond the obvious globohomo stuff.
One of the funniest things I've noticed about this site is that (by and large) everybody excepts the premise that everything [they] are telling us about the present is a lie, which is true. Well guess what? Same people are telling us 'this is how it happened in the past' too, and everybody unquestioningly believes them. Ironic.
Thousands of people like up to meet the pope every year. A picture of a pope with epstein and ghislaineeans just as much as a picture of trump with epstein and ghislaine, except with the pictured pope there isn’t even a suggestion that they knew each other.
The current pope (francis) allowed this photo to escape to scandalize JPII and that is the real scandal.
The Catholic Church as been tied to numerous scandals involving kids. You can’t keep a blind eye to this. You saying that the current pope allowing the people to see a picture of a pope and Epstein is a scandal is really telling. Don’t idolize these people, man. Just because they claim to be “holy” men doesn’t mean they are. They’re pure evil and always have been.
I don’t idolize them. I analyze them. Many bad popes. Pope Francis may be the worst.
Does a public picture indicate a relationship? How about Trump and epstein, then? This picture of a pope with someone we have no indication he even knew.
John Paul II was a salesman for IG Farben and an actor in his spare time before joining the priesthood.
Don't act like he didn't practice Babylonian rituals like his successors Benedict and Francis.
I can tell you either haven't read or don't understand John Paul II's last encyclical. It was published in 1991 on the 100th year anniversary of Rerum Novarum.
First of all: what someone does before they join the priesthood means nothing unless they were a satanist or convicted pedophile. Do you suggest that priests/popes/etc must be without sin?
Secondly: prove it on the occult rituals
Thirdly: neither remum novarum nor the pope’s recent encyclical call for forced wealth redistribution. It is clearly you who do not understand the encyclical.
Your username is inspired by Don Quixote, who was a parody of the Jesuit Ignatius Loyola. Don Quixote also plays a part in the Skulls and Bones initiation ceremony, likely as a nod to the Black Pope.
There is a devil, a Don Quixote and a Pope, who has one foot sheathed in a white monogrammed slipper resting on a stone skull. The initiates are led into the room one at a time. And once an initiate is inside, the Bonesmen shriek at him. Finally, the Bonesman is shoved to his knees in front of Don Quixote as the shrieking crowd falls silent. And Don Quixote lifts his sword and taps the Bonesman on his left shoulder and says, "By the order of our order, I dub thee knight of Euloga.
Now, if what you're saying about forced wealth redistribution is true, how do you explain the following statement from Pope John Paul II?
Christian tradition has never recognized the right to private property as absolute and untouchable: ‘On the contrary, it has always understood this right within the broader context of the right common to all to use the goods of the whole of creation: the right to private property is subordinated to the right to common use, to the fact that goods are meant for everyone.
As far as the Babylonian rituals, you can prove it yourself when you go to Catholic Mass and praise the Blessed Virgin Mary as co-redemptrix, mediatrix, and advocate.
Jeremiah 7:18
The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger.
In Will Durant's Our Oriental Heritage, written in 1942, it's plain to see the Babylonians praised Ishtar in much the same way Catholics praise Mary today.
Mary is the mother of Jesus but she is not to be worshipped (or even venerated, as I know Catholics like to use that word in place of worship as if it makes a difference).
You don’t understand the words you are using, and as a result, you only use them as weapons.
Mary is co redemptrix means: helper to the redeemer (christ being the redeemer), not “co-redeemer.”
Mary is advocate, meaning she advocates to Jesus, her Son, as she did in life at the wedding of Cana.
Worship and veneration are different. No one gives offering to Mary or bakes cakes for her. Many catholics ask her to pray for them. We do not praise or worship her - we hold her in higher esteem than humans still living, though, along with angels and the cloud of witnesses and all the heavenly beings inhabiting Heaven and sharing in God’s perfection.
Calm the hatred in your heart. God loves you snd created you to love him and to love others.
Worship and veneration are different. No one gives offering to Mary or bakes cakes for her.
MOST Holy Virgin, I venerate thee with my whole heart above all angels and saints in Paradise, as the Daughter of the Eternal FATHER, and I consecrate to thee my soul with all its powers. Ave Maria.
MOST Holy Virgin, I venerate thee with my whole heart above all angels and saints in Paradise, as the Mother of the Only-begotten SON, and I consecrate to thee my body with all its senses. Ave Maria.
MOST Holy Virgin, I venerate thee with my whole heart above all angels and saints in Paradise, as the Spouse of the HOLY GHOST, and I consecrate to thee my heart and all its affections, praying thee to obtain for me from the ever-blessed Trinity all that is necessary for my salvation. Ave Maria
I understand perfectly, Don Quixote.
Consecrating one's soul, body, and heart and all its affections to the Virgin Mary is veneration, not worship, and consecrating AKA setting aside one's soul. body, and heart for a sacred purpose is not an offering by your sophist definitions, I'm sure.
Catholics most definitely refer to Mary as Queen of Heaven even though it's not mentioned anywhere in the entire Bible except as a BAD THING!
And I notice you did not address anything else I pointed out in the previous post besides the comment about Blessed Virgin Mary being the co-redemptrix, mediatrix, and advocate.
Please explain what this means-
Christian tradition has never recognized the right to private property as absolute and untouchable: ‘On the contrary, it has always understood this right within the broader context of the right common to all to use the goods of the whole of creation: the right to private property is subordinated to the right to common use, to the fact that goods are meant for everyone.
Who decides how to redistribute the private property of others according to Christian tradition?
And why do Catholics praise Mary in much the same way the Babylonians praised Ishtar AKA Ashtoreth? After all Ishtar was also the co-redemptrix, mediatrix, and advocate. Have a better answer than quabbling about the difference between worship and veneration?
She is the Mother of God, who crushes the head of the serpent. Why are you threatened by her preeminence above all angels and saints and yet obviously below God? Do you think that she who was chosen to be the Ark of the New Covenant would e at the same level as anyone who goes to heaven?
Anyone who's a practicing Catholic and cannot see that they are involved in a non-Christian satanic cult either needs to have their head examined or doesn't know a thing about their own belief system...
You'd be surprised how many (real) Catholics are not a fan of the current antipope. It surprises me at times; I figured I'd be just about the only one.
Freemason symbols on what became the Iron Cross on the right (original Templar sigil used my numerous european/germanic groups and it eventually morphed into the Iron Cross). Knights Templar order had nothing to do with the Freemasons; and was disbanded centuries before they came around. Masons are/were just wannabe templars trying to ride the coattails of their success; and co-opted a bunch of their stuff. And you're right about the vatican and by extension the antipope. Many internal problems even beyond the obvious globohomo stuff.
--A Catholic
https://qalerts.app/?q=%23936
One of the funniest things I've noticed about this site is that (by and large) everybody excepts the premise that everything [they] are telling us about the present is a lie, which is true. Well guess what? Same people are telling us 'this is how it happened in the past' too, and everybody unquestioningly believes them. Ironic.
Roman catholics have a hard reality to face. The whole thing is predicated on idolatry. Babalonyaian.
They twist the scriptures and hide the truth.
Christianity doesn't need a label. If have one then it's a bogus man made religion and not a father child relationship.
No.
Thousands of people like up to meet the pope every year. A picture of a pope with epstein and ghislaineeans just as much as a picture of trump with epstein and ghislaine, except with the pictured pope there isn’t even a suggestion that they knew each other.
The current pope (francis) allowed this photo to escape to scandalize JPII and that is the real scandal.
The Catholic Church as been tied to numerous scandals involving kids. You can’t keep a blind eye to this. You saying that the current pope allowing the people to see a picture of a pope and Epstein is a scandal is really telling. Don’t idolize these people, man. Just because they claim to be “holy” men doesn’t mean they are. They’re pure evil and always have been.
I don’t idolize them. I analyze them. Many bad popes. Pope Francis may be the worst.
Does a public picture indicate a relationship? How about Trump and epstein, then? This picture of a pope with someone we have no indication he even knew.
John Paul II was a salesman for IG Farben and an actor in his spare time before joining the priesthood.
Don't act like he didn't practice Babylonian rituals like his successors Benedict and Francis.
I can tell you either haven't read or don't understand John Paul II's last encyclical. It was published in 1991 on the 100th year anniversary of Rerum Novarum.
https://archive.md/ZBI5l
Redistribution of wealth is not a good thing if it's forced upon the people.
First of all: what someone does before they join the priesthood means nothing unless they were a satanist or convicted pedophile. Do you suggest that priests/popes/etc must be without sin?
Secondly: prove it on the occult rituals
Thirdly: neither remum novarum nor the pope’s recent encyclical call for forced wealth redistribution. It is clearly you who do not understand the encyclical.
Your username is inspired by Don Quixote, who was a parody of the Jesuit Ignatius Loyola. Don Quixote also plays a part in the Skulls and Bones initiation ceremony, likely as a nod to the Black Pope.
There is a devil, a Don Quixote and a Pope, who has one foot sheathed in a white monogrammed slipper resting on a stone skull. The initiates are led into the room one at a time. And once an initiate is inside, the Bonesmen shriek at him. Finally, the Bonesman is shoved to his knees in front of Don Quixote as the shrieking crowd falls silent. And Don Quixote lifts his sword and taps the Bonesman on his left shoulder and says, "By the order of our order, I dub thee knight of Euloga.
https://youtu.be/JGhq6E-AjSY
Now, if what you're saying about forced wealth redistribution is true, how do you explain the following statement from Pope John Paul II?
https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/justpeace/documents/rc_pc_justpeace_doc_20060526_compendio-dott-soc_en.html
Archived link - https://archive.md/3s4KD
As far as the Babylonian rituals, you can prove it yourself when you go to Catholic Mass and praise the Blessed Virgin Mary as co-redemptrix, mediatrix, and advocate.
Jeremiah 7:18
The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the queen of heaven, and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods, that they may provoke me to anger.
In Will Durant's Our Oriental Heritage, written in 1942, it's plain to see the Babylonians praised Ishtar in much the same way Catholics praise Mary today.
https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.61276/page/n343/mode/2up
Mary is the mother of Jesus but she is not to be worshipped (or even venerated, as I know Catholics like to use that word in place of worship as if it makes a difference).
You don’t understand the words you are using, and as a result, you only use them as weapons.
Mary is co redemptrix means: helper to the redeemer (christ being the redeemer), not “co-redeemer.”
Mary is advocate, meaning she advocates to Jesus, her Son, as she did in life at the wedding of Cana.
Worship and veneration are different. No one gives offering to Mary or bakes cakes for her. Many catholics ask her to pray for them. We do not praise or worship her - we hold her in higher esteem than humans still living, though, along with angels and the cloud of witnesses and all the heavenly beings inhabiting Heaven and sharing in God’s perfection.
Calm the hatred in your heart. God loves you snd created you to love him and to love others.
MOST Holy Virgin, I venerate thee with my whole heart above all angels and saints in Paradise, as the Daughter of the Eternal FATHER, and I consecrate to thee my soul with all its powers. Ave Maria.
MOST Holy Virgin, I venerate thee with my whole heart above all angels and saints in Paradise, as the Mother of the Only-begotten SON, and I consecrate to thee my body with all its senses. Ave Maria.
MOST Holy Virgin, I venerate thee with my whole heart above all angels and saints in Paradise, as the Spouse of the HOLY GHOST, and I consecrate to thee my heart and all its affections, praying thee to obtain for me from the ever-blessed Trinity all that is necessary for my salvation. Ave Maria
I understand perfectly, Don Quixote.
Consecrating one's soul, body, and heart and all its affections to the Virgin Mary is veneration, not worship, and consecrating AKA setting aside one's soul. body, and heart for a sacred purpose is not an offering by your sophist definitions, I'm sure.
Catholics most definitely refer to Mary as Queen of Heaven even though it's not mentioned anywhere in the entire Bible except as a BAD THING!
And I notice you did not address anything else I pointed out in the previous post besides the comment about Blessed Virgin Mary being the co-redemptrix, mediatrix, and advocate.
Please explain what this means-
Christian tradition has never recognized the right to private property as absolute and untouchable: ‘On the contrary, it has always understood this right within the broader context of the right common to all to use the goods of the whole of creation: the right to private property is subordinated to the right to common use, to the fact that goods are meant for everyone.
Who decides how to redistribute the private property of others according to Christian tradition?
And why do Catholics praise Mary in much the same way the Babylonians praised Ishtar AKA Ashtoreth? After all Ishtar was also the co-redemptrix, mediatrix, and advocate. Have a better answer than quabbling about the difference between worship and veneration?
She is the Mother of God, who crushes the head of the serpent. Why are you threatened by her preeminence above all angels and saints and yet obviously below God? Do you think that she who was chosen to be the Ark of the New Covenant would e at the same level as anyone who goes to heaven?
If you did not know who they were, because it was before he was even convicted of pedophilia, you wouldn’t actually feel anything at all.
Were Mr. and Mrs. Epstein there to buy or to sell?
Could it beeee, Satan?!
Anyone who's a practicing Catholic and cannot see that they are involved in a non-Christian satanic cult either needs to have their head examined or doesn't know a thing about their own belief system...
You don't really know much about the Catholic faith beyond what you've been taught, do you?
Actually I know quite a lot from research on the subject...
(X) Doubt
I always wondered why Catholics can't see what a piece of shit this pope is. But then Christians are like that, too, very sheepy.
You'd be surprised how many (real) Catholics are not a fan of the current antipope. It surprises me at times; I figured I'd be just about the only one.
Catholicism is paganism with wallpaper on it.
The Vatican is also in the shape of an upside down cross.
https://qalerts.app/?q=%23936