In this case, naming names is a very good thing and the ultimate "redpilled."
(humansarefree.com)
Comments (21)
sorted by:
The thing about privateers, sure they operate under a letter of marque type arrangement, such that they can do the bidding of a nation while maintaining plausible deniability... like anonymous frigates raiding along the spanish main to capture pillage from the new world being returned back to europe.. but that give a cut to the UK.
But they can also die by the same sword they wield. And the powers that back them must look the other way and pretend not to care.. after all, they were just pirates!
History is illustrative.
The most astute observation I've seen on this board in months!
Holy shit.
That's what I said!
So who's dug into Anser?
Great question... and there are plenty more.
And many more...
Fors-Marsh? Seriously?
These are the same folks that did the EAVS Report to Congress from the EAC (Elections Assistance Commission) for the 2020 Election.
https://greatawakening.win/p/13zgSKBB6j/why-doesnt-this-make-sense-to-me/
https://www.eac.gov/research-and-data/studies-and-reports
Here's the report.
"This report by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission is the result of a contract to collect and analyze data for the 2020 Election Administration and Voting Survey. The contract was performed by Fors Marsh Group LLC, an applied research company based in Arlington, VA. " Unreal... what a tangled web... and good memory!
Yeah, well. Their name stuck with me when the reported on page 1 of their report to Congress that the voting totals from mail-in + early in person + in person on election day totalled up to 104% ( but only if you did the math yourself.). Made me wanna dig further into them a bit.
From Chapter 1, page 1, third point:
You would think that for a matter with such significance, especially considering the legitimate reports of fraud, the government could have crunched their own numbers...but of course this gives them plausible deniability... shameful.
Am thinking GOD is revealing some connections that we should be more aware of. Digworthy. "Coincidences" like this are meant to be examined more deeply, imho.
Naming names...
I agree... I'll be spending some time on this.
Just capturing a dot here (maybe irrelevant), but connecting Fors-Marsh to Pew Research to global research efforts. (Where's Amazing Polly when you need? She's so much better at this.) https://www.koerber-stiftung.de/en/berlin-foreign-policy-forum/overview-berlin-foreign-policy-forum/forum-2021
Quick list:
Here is a list of all the people in that slide:
I feel a little bit dumb after watching this...had no idea about some of the entities and people who he says are intimately involved. Would love to know how he was able to get his information.
Excerpt from the presentation:
Late to the party but I've just added Dr. Martin to my prayer list for God's Protection and Wisdom. SHAME on me. Shoulda done this a LONG time ago...
I don’t know what to make about all this. I don’t think it’s as simple as “here’s the list”. I mean the names we know, the many that their are, would love to stop focusing on them, and go full, 100%, into “the list”. Also it’s the “you didn’t know that, did you!”...feel like I’m getting schooled by a 10th grader.
I think the names here are important. But it’s much bigger than this list. Any list that doesn’t mention the Clintons, or Obama, or even Fauci..I feel is a incomplete list.
Important. But isn’t “it”. My 2 cents.
Time for Nuremburg 2.0 trials and hangings.
Very interesting, lots to take in.
What is the consensus on this guy? His website has (or maybe had, have not checked in a few months) Masonic imagery, and I seem to remember other users claiming he was a Mason. He has all these fiery lectures on all this from a scientific and bureaucratic standpoint with plenty of apparent sauce. It just seems a little off to me. Something about him feels manufactured/tailored to fit this role he is in perfectly.