Jarrin Jackson Noting Interesting Rittenhouse Interview Timeline 🤔 - The Great Awakening

159

Jarrin Jackson Noting Interesting Rittenhouse Interview Timeline 🤔 (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 3 years ago by 27745 3 years ago by 27745 +161 / -2

29 comments download

29 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (29)

sorted by:

▲ 7 ▼

– LongTimeListener 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Too many questions surrounding this incident from the night Rittenhouse shot three criminals, right through the trial and now the aftermath to not maintain a healthy skepticism about it all.

A lot of narrative building going on and I dont really trust either side. Im not even sure there is two sides.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 6 ▼

– Grady_Wilson 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

One of those questions I'd like answered is how did a FBI drone know to follow Rittenhouse at that exact moment all of this went down?

And if Rittenhouse wasn't specifically targeted, that means the FBI has high res footage of every riot from every angle.

Why has the FBI not shared this footage with the DOJ or local law enforcement to prosecute the rioters?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– SocratesKnowsNothing 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

do we know it was an fbi drone or is it drone footage the fbi got hold of to call it "fbi drone footage"? I'd guess the latter but haven't researched

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– GoingCamaro 0 points 3 years ago +1 / -1

Again, why did it track Rittenhouse?

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q