Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

16
Ahmaud Arbery trial: Jury finds McMichaels, Bryan guilty on felony murder charges (www.foxnews.com)
posted 4 years ago by TheRoyalRob 4 years ago by TheRoyalRob +16 / -0
22 comments share
22 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (22)
sorted by:
▲ 8 ▼
– TheRoyalRob [S] 8 points 4 years ago +8 / -0

They found the dude who filmed it guilty of felony murder also... lol how does that work?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– watchman87 6 points 4 years ago +6 / -0

yeah thats the most fucked up part of the whole story. they guy sat in his car the whole time, didn't do anything but film it. and he gets locked up? WTF people he was not part of the crime in the first place. dumbass jury

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 7 ▼
– GoingCamaro 7 points 4 years ago +7 / -0

While I do think our vigilante laws need reworking, these guys should never have chased him.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Icantdothis2 5 points 4 years ago +5 / -0

3 on 1 as well.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– blacksmith21 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

Let's see if they riot in celebration...

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– lkjsdf9845 3 points 4 years ago +3 / -0

This is a miscarriage of justice. People keep saying they "should not have chased him" but that is absolutely incorrect. Everyone has a right to defend their neighborhood against burglars. Arbery was NOT a "jogger" as we all know. He was repeatedly filmed trespassing on properties where things had gone missing. There was an ongoing problem in that neighborhood which is why the neighbors were on alert.

If we did not have the right to defend our neighborhood from this kind of thing, then we therefore could not possibly delegate this power to the police. You can only delegate powers that exist.

Furthermore, these men did not "hunt him down and shoot him." They tried to detain him for the authorities. He did not have to assault them either. Remember it was only when Arbery caused a struggle over a gun, and someone feared for their life, that he was shot. He did not have to make this choice.

Calling this "murder" is an absolute miscarriage of justice. At this point, with the authorities so corrupt and evil, what choice do people have except to live in communities where there are no blacks?

Do we have a right to be left alone?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TheRoyalRob [S] 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Yep, I agree with you 100% Zero way this is murder for ALL THREE of them. When they woke up that day, or even when they saw Arbery, they didn't have it on their mind to kill someone.

I mean what do you do? Just watch the thug roam your neighborhood, call the cops, by the time they show up, he's gone.

I mean I probably would have done the same thing, chase the dude out of my neighborhood or try to stop him and wait for the cops, in my mind I see absolutely nothing wrong with that..... ESPECIALLY in this day and age we live in.

But he charged the dude tried to take his gun, got shot and because of Arbery's actions they most likely will all go away for life, for protecting their neighborhood.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– trumper1776 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

there was no legal case for making a citizens arrest. suspicion of theft alone isnt enough to detain him with guns. they didnt catch arbery commiting theft. do you really want a legal precedent that any asshole can try to make citizens arrest based on suspicions alone? Next time you're in a city, some antifa faggot is allowed to hold you at gun point?

we have laws. if someones stealing from your property you can hold them at your property. this was not it

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TheRoyalRob [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I mean I see what you are saying, I see both sides, maybe I'm in the wrong and honestly I'm fine with that. I don't want to see anyone hurt or killed no matter what color, but dude was obviously somewhere he shouldn't have been, doing shit he shouldn't be doing. He put himself in that situation, then he exacerbated the problem by running at the person with a gun and trying to take it.... I think looking at Arbery's past, the fact they saw him there before, he's in a house he shouldn't be in, these are things he did, they should be taken in to account. Those dudes were not out there trying to murder a black dude... thats BS.

And I wouldn't care cause I would never be where ANTIFA is and if they did try to pull guns on me we would have a nice little shoot out... I'd honestly be happier with a shoot out then to have to go through our bullshit legal system.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– TheRoyalRob [S] 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Mostly because the whole "We have laws" aren't going to work for law abiding gun folks much longer. Kyle fucking squeaked by on something that should have never been charged, 40-50 years ago Arbury case would have never been charged.

I mean I get it, but if you are relying on laws of the land to protect your family or your neighborhoods, probably worthless to have guns in the future.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TheRoyalRob [S] 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Don't know the in's and out's of this one, like I did with Kyle's, but wasn't this all on video also?

Didn't Arbery try to run up and take their gun?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– GoingCamaro 4 points 4 years ago +4 / -0

It was NOT on video. The problem is they suspected a crime of Misdemeanor degree which does NOT constitute a citizen's arrest. Now we can argue those implications, but the law is the law and in this instance both men tried playing cop and are paying the price

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– lustmorden 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

I don't get it, how does that lead to a murder charge if that's the issue?

Arbery got shot after he ran up to them and (stupidly) grabbed a gun that wasn't pointed at anyone. That's not murder??

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– GoingCamaro 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

It is because the response to the crime did not necessitate them confronting him armed. Laws regarding citizens arrests are pretty clear that if it isn't a misdemeanor, it isn't your jurisdiction. So it can be articulated that them approaching him armed was already them overstepping their bounds regardless of Arbury committing theft.

Now I don't entirely agree with those distinctions, but I am also not for rescinding those laws unless everyone goes through police academy training in high school.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– lustmorden 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I just listened to this: https://youtu.be/K-KHz-mkQSU

No wonder I haven't been hearing lefties going on about this case. They're actually guilty, or incredibly stupid to incriminate themselves so thoroughly.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– GoingCamaro 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Jesus some of those fuckin comments... and yes they are guilty. This is not a political resolution. The system, once again, proved itself true.

Now they might be able to get some of the convictions appealed as I don't think intent was proven, but they should not have chased at all. That was dumb and they are paying the price as they should.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– lkjsdf9845 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

I think they were convicted of "felony murder" which is not the same as "murder." It refers to a situation where someone dies during the commission of a separate crime.

The "separate crime" presumably in this case is doing a citizen's arrest over a misdemeanor. If that is a felony and if someone died during the arrest, then they would be able to nail them on felony murder.

IMO this case is still a huge miscarriage of justice and does not portend well to those who want to simultaneously have the right to defend their neighborhood while also living among blacks.

People may have to simply live apart from blacks in order to avoid these problems in the future.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– MEBLOCK 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0

Yes. There was a struggle for the gun (one on one, as another watched from the truck bed, and another filmed). Some of the struggle was not in the video. Arbery was shot, staggered a bit and went down.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– GoingCamaro 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

IOW, not very reliable.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– deleted 2 points 4 years ago +2 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Welcome


The Great Awakening


We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.


WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q


Welcome to the Digital Battlefield — Together We Win

Rules


Q Supporters

This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"



Follow the Law

No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!



No Bad Behavior!

No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!



Civil Discussion ONLY**

They want you divided.

They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.

Divided you are weak [no collective power].

Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].



No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion

Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.



Questions and Concerns

All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.



Expand your thinking

Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!



No doomers or shills

If you can't use common sense, you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding.



General Rules

  • Mods will issue NO warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

  • Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current.

  • Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum.

  • HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO posts only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait.

  • No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, people!

  • Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info posts.

  • Keep it honest and accurate.

  • GAW Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, the train had no brakes.)

  • Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their Q knowledge, sincerity, and respect.

  • Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING!

  • Please direct all complaints to modmail first!


Resources


WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD


"River of Search" script:


GAW post formatting tips


Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)


Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4


Browse Drops from the beginning


QProofs.com


Learn to read the Q map


Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)


Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources


Trumps twitter archive


POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm


Pedosta and DNC dumps


GIFs & QPosts


Poll Post Format


SPY ON US! See: mod Logs


The Greatest Show on Earth!


New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?"


Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • Fatality
  • Qanaut
  • bubble_bursts
  • Brent75
  • and 7 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy