In the beginning.. it was Q Anon or Q Clearance Patriot. Q Anon was dubbed because of 'FBI Anon' and 'Pamplet Anon' which 'Q Anon' followed shortly after on 4ch.You can blame 4ch which everyone is an 'anon'. It's what I called it called it 4 years ago up until the last few weeks Q posted. It's why Qanon.pub is named that. This rewriting history is bizarre.
The fact that some Q followers called themselves Q Anon has nothing to do with Qanon (the singular entity Q + Anons) not being a media creation. It could very well be that some Q followers called themselves Q Anon because the CIA implanted the idea directly, or through the media. Regardless of whether or not that is true, Q states explicitly:
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
This is not ambiguous. Q states that Qanon is a media label (aka media creation). Even if the term didn't start there, it became the idea it is today because of the media.
This is exactly the same thing that has been done throughout history. If you look up the term "Conspiracy Theory" in old newspapers, most of the time they use that phrase to talk about investigators coming up with theories to solve a crime of conspiracy. No negative connotation is included. Sometimes it is used to discredit, but most of the uses in old newspapers were innocuous.
Then in 1967 the C_A put out Countering Criticisms of the Warren Report. It coins the term "Conspiracy Theorist", a directed attack on an individual who looks at evidence of a conspiracy. This is not the same as a general theory, but a theorist, a person, who should not be listened to. It says:
The aim of this dispatch is to provide material_ for_countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries.
When you look at newspaper archives, this is the first mention of "conspiracy theorist" ever recorded. It also changed the idea of "conspiracy theory" from sometimes derisive, to always derisive. It is now a term used solely to censor all evidence to the contrary of the official narrative.
Same with Qanon. In this case however it discredits an entire group of people who would otherwise be listened to. As a statement of derision, it is absolutely a media creation.
I disavow Qanon all the time.
Flynn disavowing Qanon is exactly what he should be doing. By calling attention to it people are much more likely to find posts exactly like this that show that
Q + Anon =/= Qanon
This makes people a lot more likely to actually look at Q, even if they have heard that Qanon is a misinformation campaign or a cult. Because Qanon is not Q.
When the media mentions Qanon they're talking about Q.
When the media mentions Qanon they are never talking about Q.
Q is the Q drops. Period. There is no other element to Q in the public sphere.
The Anon's on the other hand come up with all kinds of crazy shit; including things that are in there by Anon's that are actually C_A or other government or media plants.
By linking them they can directly quote Anon shit and call it Q shit when in fact it has nothing to do with anything that Q said. You will notice that the media never quotes Q directly except in relation to crazy shit that Anon's say.
This is standard Counter Intelligence Program stuff (COINTELPRO). This is how groups in opposition to The Matrix narrative get discredited; by linking two things together that are otherwise completely separate. Another element of that is through infiltration where an agent enters the group they can (Anons) and puts out propaganda to discredit or mislead the group (Anons). This then is used as fuel to discredit Q in the public sphere through the false, media created link of Qanon.
There is a reason why MSM chose to avoid using the accurate term Q vs “Qanon”. I don’t know why, but MSM has gone to great lengths to avoid a direct reference to Q just like they avoid ever linking to a reflector site or citing Q directly.
GENERAL FLYNN via PHONE RECORDING: "I think [the QAnon movement] is a disinformation campaign that the CIA created ... article was sent to me that ... the QAnon movement has failed ... I find it y'know, total nonsense. I think it's a disinformation campaign created by the left. The types of people that can create something like that are the kinds of people that we train for certain skills in the CIA." LINK: https://t.me/linwoodspeakstruth/7675
In the beginning.. it was Q Anon or Q Clearance Patriot. Q Anon was dubbed because of 'FBI Anon' and 'Pamplet Anon' which 'Q Anon' followed shortly after on 4ch.You can blame 4ch which everyone is an 'anon'. It's what I called it called it 4 years ago up until the last few weeks Q posted. It's why Qanon.pub is named that. This rewriting history is bizarre.
The fact that some Q followers called themselves Q Anon has nothing to do with Qanon (the singular entity Q + Anons) not being a media creation. It could very well be that some Q followers called themselves Q Anon because the CIA implanted the idea directly, or through the media. Regardless of whether or not that is true, Q states explicitly:
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
This is not ambiguous. Q states that Qanon is a media label (aka media creation). Even if the term didn't start there, it became the idea it is today because of the media.
This is exactly the same thing that has been done throughout history. If you look up the term "Conspiracy Theory" in old newspapers, most of the time they use that phrase to talk about investigators coming up with theories to solve a crime of conspiracy. No negative connotation is included. Sometimes it is used to discredit, but most of the uses in old newspapers were innocuous.
Then in 1967 the C_A put out Countering Criticisms of the Warren Report. It coins the term "Conspiracy Theorist", a directed attack on an individual who looks at evidence of a conspiracy. This is not the same as a general theory, but a theorist, a person, who should not be listened to. It says:
When you look at newspaper archives, this is the first mention of "conspiracy theorist" ever recorded. It also changed the idea of "conspiracy theory" from sometimes derisive, to always derisive. It is now a term used solely to censor all evidence to the contrary of the official narrative.
Same with Qanon. In this case however it discredits an entire group of people who would otherwise be listened to. As a statement of derision, it is absolutely a media creation.
I disavow Qanon all the time.
Flynn disavowing Qanon is exactly what he should be doing. By calling attention to it people are much more likely to find posts exactly like this that show that
Q + Anon =/= Qanon
This makes people a lot more likely to actually look at Q, even if they have heard that Qanon is a misinformation campaign or a cult. Because Qanon is not Q.
At all.
TL;DR the media uses the term Qanon to try to weave narratives about us. we reject this term and their attempts at manipulation.
EXACTLY Slyver! Well said and explained!
When the media mentions Qanon they are never talking about Q.
Q is the Q drops. Period. There is no other element to Q in the public sphere.
The Anon's on the other hand come up with all kinds of crazy shit; including things that are in there by Anon's that are actually C_A or other government or media plants.
By linking them they can directly quote Anon shit and call it Q shit when in fact it has nothing to do with anything that Q said. You will notice that the media never quotes Q directly except in relation to crazy shit that Anon's say.
This is standard Counter Intelligence Program stuff (COINTELPRO). This is how groups in opposition to The Matrix narrative get discredited; by linking two things together that are otherwise completely separate. Another element of that is through infiltration where an agent enters the group they can (Anons) and puts out propaganda to discredit or mislead the group (Anons). This then is used as fuel to discredit Q in the public sphere through the false, media created link of Qanon.
Yes to all of this.
Therein lies the key… the media fears Q or they would have asked Trump the question: “WHO is Q?”
There is a reason why MSM chose to avoid using the accurate term Q vs “Qanon”. I don’t know why, but MSM has gone to great lengths to avoid a direct reference to Q just like they avoid ever linking to a reflector site or citing Q directly.
Who is rewriting?
u/#q4881
Thanks anon
10/2020. Literally one of the last Q posts. That's when 'he/they' want it stopped. 3 weeks before they stopped posting.
The Q team did specifically separate themselves from the Qanon label though. The post is in the comments. I think it is 4881.
GENERAL FLYNN via PHONE RECORDING: "I think [the QAnon movement] is a disinformation campaign that the CIA created ... article was sent to me that ... the QAnon movement has failed ... I find it y'know, total nonsense. I think it's a disinformation campaign created by the left. The types of people that can create something like that are the kinds of people that we train for certain skills in the CIA." LINK: https://t.me/linwoodspeakstruth/7675