The fact that some Q followers called themselves Q Anon has nothing to do with Qanon (the singular entity Q + Anons) not being a media creation. It could very well be that some Q followers called themselves Q Anon because the CIA implanted the idea directly, or through the media. Regardless of whether or not that is true, Q states explicitly:
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
This is not ambiguous. Q states that Qanon is a media label (aka media creation). Even if the term didn't start there, it became the idea it is today because of the media.
This is exactly the same thing that has been done throughout history. If you look up the term "Conspiracy Theory" in old newspapers, most of the time they use that phrase to talk about investigators coming up with theories to solve a crime of conspiracy. No negative connotation is included. Sometimes it is used to discredit, but most of the uses in old newspapers were innocuous.
Then in 1967 the C_A put out Countering Criticisms of the Warren Report. It coins the term "Conspiracy Theorist", a directed attack on an individual who looks at evidence of a conspiracy. This is not the same as a general theory, but a theorist, a person, who should not be listened to. It says:
The aim of this dispatch is to provide material_ for_countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries.
When you look at newspaper archives, this is the first mention of "conspiracy theorist" ever recorded. It also changed the idea of "conspiracy theory" from sometimes derisive, to always derisive. It is now a term used solely to censor all evidence to the contrary of the official narrative.
Same with Qanon. In this case however it discredits an entire group of people who would otherwise be listened to. As a statement of derision, it is absolutely a media creation.
I disavow Qanon all the time.
Flynn disavowing Qanon is exactly what he should be doing. By calling attention to it people are much more likely to find posts exactly like this that show that
Q + Anon =/= Qanon
This makes people a lot more likely to actually look at Q, even if they have heard that Qanon is a misinformation campaign or a cult. Because Qanon is not Q.
When the media mentions Qanon they're talking about Q.
When the media mentions Qanon they are never talking about Q.
Q is the Q drops. Period. There is no other element to Q in the public sphere.
The Anon's on the other hand come up with all kinds of crazy shit; including things that are in there by Anon's that are actually C_A or other government or media plants.
By linking them they can directly quote Anon shit and call it Q shit when in fact it has nothing to do with anything that Q said. You will notice that the media never quotes Q directly except in relation to crazy shit that Anon's say.
This is standard Counter Intelligence Program stuff (COINTELPRO). This is how groups in opposition to The Matrix narrative get discredited; by linking two things together that are otherwise completely separate. Another element of that is through infiltration where an agent enters the group they can (Anons) and puts out propaganda to discredit or mislead the group (Anons). This then is used as fuel to discredit Q in the public sphere through the false, media created link of Qanon.
When does the media ever say anything about anons?
The media talks about the singular (non existent) group Qanon.
I'm not understanding your confusion. Are you reading what I'm writing? I'm explaining the programs they use to create the propaganda that guides belief in the population.
Your comment just made something click w me - remember when trump was asked about Q (not Qanon IIRC) he said something about (para) “him hating pedophiles like that’s a bad thing”…that was the only time I can recall MSM using Q vs “Qanon” accurately.
That’s correct. They did indeed have EVERY reason to ask the question. They are projecting specialists. Isn’t it odd how they use the ridiculous term Qanon liberally and spread rubbish rumors, blaming some Qanon person for every type of calamity… but they don’t ask the one person who knows the answer. I guess what I’m saying is they fear Q, they know this is the end because of Q, and as time passed between 2017-2021 the only person in the Light that ever even referred to Q was indeed Donald John Trump, POTUS, re-elected, sitting. They NEVER asked him about Q… they NEVER confronted him on “Qanon” bs. Why? The answer is this: by them asking that question, Q as a novel rumor, would immediately become reality and everything Q team posted, would become real. POTUS would have loved to answer that question I’m sure. I find all of it to be strange and very annoying. I wish POTUS and Q team would stop fooling around and get them all neutralized.
By the way, POTUS did a lot of coms from his podium including quite a few Q swishes and signing a Patriot pic with Q+… he IS Q+… that’s my take on it… my faith is a powerful thing. I am dug in, holding the line, and propping up my fellow fren Pepe’s… We are Q… Q are Anons… We The Sovereign People are united for God and Country. God bless and God speed…
There is a reason why MSM chose to avoid using the accurate term Q vs “Qanon”. I don’t know why, but MSM has gone to great lengths to avoid a direct reference to Q just like they avoid ever linking to a reflector site or citing Q directly.
The fact that some Q followers called themselves Q Anon has nothing to do with Qanon (the singular entity Q + Anons) not being a media creation. It could very well be that some Q followers called themselves Q Anon because the CIA implanted the idea directly, or through the media. Regardless of whether or not that is true, Q states explicitly:
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
This is not ambiguous. Q states that Qanon is a media label (aka media creation). Even if the term didn't start there, it became the idea it is today because of the media.
This is exactly the same thing that has been done throughout history. If you look up the term "Conspiracy Theory" in old newspapers, most of the time they use that phrase to talk about investigators coming up with theories to solve a crime of conspiracy. No negative connotation is included. Sometimes it is used to discredit, but most of the uses in old newspapers were innocuous.
Then in 1967 the C_A put out Countering Criticisms of the Warren Report. It coins the term "Conspiracy Theorist", a directed attack on an individual who looks at evidence of a conspiracy. This is not the same as a general theory, but a theorist, a person, who should not be listened to. It says:
When you look at newspaper archives, this is the first mention of "conspiracy theorist" ever recorded. It also changed the idea of "conspiracy theory" from sometimes derisive, to always derisive. It is now a term used solely to censor all evidence to the contrary of the official narrative.
Same with Qanon. In this case however it discredits an entire group of people who would otherwise be listened to. As a statement of derision, it is absolutely a media creation.
I disavow Qanon all the time.
Flynn disavowing Qanon is exactly what he should be doing. By calling attention to it people are much more likely to find posts exactly like this that show that
Q + Anon =/= Qanon
This makes people a lot more likely to actually look at Q, even if they have heard that Qanon is a misinformation campaign or a cult. Because Qanon is not Q.
At all.
TL;DR the media uses the term Qanon to try to weave narratives about us. we reject this term and their attempts at manipulation.
EXACTLY Slyver! Well said and explained!
When the media mentions Qanon they are never talking about Q.
Q is the Q drops. Period. There is no other element to Q in the public sphere.
The Anon's on the other hand come up with all kinds of crazy shit; including things that are in there by Anon's that are actually C_A or other government or media plants.
By linking them they can directly quote Anon shit and call it Q shit when in fact it has nothing to do with anything that Q said. You will notice that the media never quotes Q directly except in relation to crazy shit that Anon's say.
This is standard Counter Intelligence Program stuff (COINTELPRO). This is how groups in opposition to The Matrix narrative get discredited; by linking two things together that are otherwise completely separate. Another element of that is through infiltration where an agent enters the group they can (Anons) and puts out propaganda to discredit or mislead the group (Anons). This then is used as fuel to discredit Q in the public sphere through the false, media created link of Qanon.
Yes to all of this.
When does the media ever say anything about Q?
When does the media ever say anything about anons?
The media talks about the singular (non existent) group Qanon.
I'm not understanding your confusion. Are you reading what I'm writing? I'm explaining the programs they use to create the propaganda that guides belief in the population.
You were just told what the difference is and why it matters. Being willfully ignorant isn't a good look.
Therein lies the key… the media fears Q or they would have asked Trump the question: “WHO is Q?”
Your comment just made something click w me - remember when trump was asked about Q (not Qanon IIRC) he said something about (para) “him hating pedophiles like that’s a bad thing”…that was the only time I can recall MSM using Q vs “Qanon” accurately.
That’s correct. They did indeed have EVERY reason to ask the question. They are projecting specialists. Isn’t it odd how they use the ridiculous term Qanon liberally and spread rubbish rumors, blaming some Qanon person for every type of calamity… but they don’t ask the one person who knows the answer. I guess what I’m saying is they fear Q, they know this is the end because of Q, and as time passed between 2017-2021 the only person in the Light that ever even referred to Q was indeed Donald John Trump, POTUS, re-elected, sitting. They NEVER asked him about Q… they NEVER confronted him on “Qanon” bs. Why? The answer is this: by them asking that question, Q as a novel rumor, would immediately become reality and everything Q team posted, would become real. POTUS would have loved to answer that question I’m sure. I find all of it to be strange and very annoying. I wish POTUS and Q team would stop fooling around and get them all neutralized. By the way, POTUS did a lot of coms from his podium including quite a few Q swishes and signing a Patriot pic with Q+… he IS Q+… that’s my take on it… my faith is a powerful thing. I am dug in, holding the line, and propping up my fellow fren Pepe’s… We are Q… Q are Anons… We The Sovereign People are united for God and Country. God bless and God speed…
There is a reason why MSM chose to avoid using the accurate term Q vs “Qanon”. I don’t know why, but MSM has gone to great lengths to avoid a direct reference to Q just like they avoid ever linking to a reflector site or citing Q directly.