Interesting - VERY.
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (137)
sorted by:
Correct. I am assuming that. I am hoping that. But I am also implying the question you have hinted at, which is why I mentioned risking the wrath of this Board.
I believe he was NOT in on it, though. I cannot see how saving the kids worldwide from pedos and satanists would fit well with then helping to exterminate so many... but, you could also say that that is a brilliant cover. My heart tells me that Trump is genuinely on the good side of things.
Best case- he was duped by using his germophobia
Worst case- extrapolate Trump's meeting with Bill Gates in 2017 after which he scrapped his Commission on Vaccine Safety
Ugh... not great choices. How about unsubstantiated hope: he was getting Gates to play his hand so as to out him?
At the meeting, sure, I can buy that. But why permanently dismantle plans for the commission? Surely not only would it have prevented the vaccine shenanigans we're seeing now, but also cleaned up existing vaccines and vaccine scheduling, which affects the development of KIDS the most.
Yeah... head-scratcher. You're ruining my Monday : )
If not for Operation Warp Speed, they would have had the world on dystopian lockdowns for many, many years. I believe that was the plan, and Op Warp Speed spoiled that. Everyone locked inside for years would be begging for the shot without question. Look at how many are one their fourth already, it's madness how normally intelligent people have been fearmongered into forgetting they have an immune system (may not for much longer if these genetic treatments are destroying them).
Why does everybody accept without question that the globalists could enforce lockdowns that lasted 4-5 years? Does everyone really think the population would put up with that without revolting at some point? I don't think keeping the entire world on lockdown for 5 years would be such an easy task. This is the one thing that has always bothered me about this explanation.
I don’t think it would necessarily be a national stockpile that the president would be privy to. But valid point.