I don't know him personally, but what I've seen of him from when he was in OKC impressed me. His interview was consistent with my memory of him. He seems to be an honest man of INTEGRITY.
Nah, the whole "not wearing another man's name on my back" has always been a statement even some die hard sports fans adhere to. We can celebrate Enes's awesomeness and still recognize it's childish to wear athlete's jerseys post-adolescence. 👍
It's okay to post a non disheartening or not completely theoretical post here occasionally. I don't think anybody here is following the stars, but I can only speak for myself.
I don't follow the stars, but I don't mind talking about them.
Sometimes I come across pertinent info that people bring up around here in regards to those "stars".
So many rabbit holes and red pills when studying the Hollywood machinery.
So basically what I'm trying to convey, is that talking about them is not the same as following them.
The "stars" can be considered a metaphor and doesn't actually require for them to be famous. Consider that hollywood is a DISTRACTION.
They thought you would follow the distraction.
It is a divisive mechanism.
While I do see the need to be able to cut away for moments to retain sanity I feel that talking about these people helps that mechanism.
If the war is not won yet do we celebrate the enemy? I cannot say that this one in particular is an enemy at all but considering from where they hail (sports, in this case), within the distraction, I do not think it a far stretch that the enemy would use all sorts of tricks to deceive. Trying to get us focused on "planted" small "victories".
I am in no way upset with this person getting citizenship, I am glad they joined, and am in no way upset with the name change for them personally is that decision. To talk about it is to take away from focus on the battle field. We should be greatful, of course but I feel it necessary to be hesitant with such topics. Perhaps it does serve as a moral boost and I am overlooking the good for the potential bad.
I must also note that talking about anyone is considered gossip. This would be a sin and lends to my previous idea.
Look I'm giving you my love for your post, thank you for taking the time.
I'll just say I agree with you on your points, and funnily enough, after I replied to you the first time I came across another post about what some 'celeb' said.
And after that I kind of saw your point, some around here just post anything, even asinine shit some 'celeb' said or did.
It gets tiring, I know now.
In regards to gossip I think its important to make a distinction between talking about someone and plain idle chatter.
I'm sure you know that already, it was just the smart ass in me replying to your 'talking about anyone is considered gossip '.
Nothing but Love from me, Fren. If I didn't love I would have allowed the thought and action to continue without recourse. I am not a fan of that particular thought and action.
Allow this to not be considered further rebuke but know that I am interested in having it seen as it is.
How are we able to talk about anyone if we do not "follow" them. We might not consider it as following and I am largely borrowing from "social media". It isn't our job to judge others, good or bad, but to love them as they are that they might understand love and turn to it. How often are people made "bad" by being denied love and how are we to turn it from bad if we continue to rebuke them over the actions they may have taken. Rather we should rebuke that which causes hate. I have no idea what the Father's plan is and to judge that which I cannot see via what I can would be nothing short of a rebuke of God's plan for his creation. Granted that none of what has been posted seems to be out of hate for this person it is far to easy to assume that this is not the Prize that we seek and we should remain focused. While idle chat may not always be considered gossip, it has gotten a stigma suggesting that it only be negative, it can easily evolve into. Much love and I appreciate the conversation!
If he's got #17 i'll get a few.
Man, that would be perfect! He's currently #11 though 🤷
Prime number. Close enough.
I like the cut of your jib
Used to play for OKC Thunder. Good player.
I love how he's had an ongoing feud with LeSnitch 😂😂
I don't know him personally, but what I've seen of him from when he was in OKC impressed me. His interview was consistent with my memory of him. He seems to be an honest man of INTEGRITY.
He was a freaking bulldog in OKC. Played well above his pay grade. Makes sense that he's a based AF PATRIOT. 👍
u/#Ridetofreedom
Noyce.
For those interested... His interview with Tucker Carlson is actually much better haha. I jumped the gun with my link... https://youtu.be/TW8MSTGSmTc
Couldn't finish... someone left onions out.
Fuck the NBA,,,,good for Enes
Have a non nba jersey printed locally, no money to them in any way.
Sweet, good idea
LOL to wearing another man's name on my back.
LOL to being that fragile.
LOL for thinking that not wanting to worship an athlete is being fragile. Foolishness.
Nah, the whole "not wearing another man's name on my back" has always been a statement even some die hard sports fans adhere to. We can celebrate Enes's awesomeness and still recognize it's childish to wear athlete's jerseys post-adolescence. 👍
Can we please stop following the stars? Haven't we learned this lesson yet?
It's okay to post a non disheartening or not completely theoretical post here occasionally. I don't think anybody here is following the stars, but I can only speak for myself.
I see so many that do
I don't follow the stars, but I don't mind talking about them. Sometimes I come across pertinent info that people bring up around here in regards to those "stars".
So many rabbit holes and red pills when studying the Hollywood machinery.
So basically what I'm trying to convey, is that talking about them is not the same as following them.
I will try to make sense of my thought process.
The "stars" can be considered a metaphor and doesn't actually require for them to be famous. Consider that hollywood is a DISTRACTION.
They thought you would follow the distraction.
It is a divisive mechanism.
While I do see the need to be able to cut away for moments to retain sanity I feel that talking about these people helps that mechanism.
If the war is not won yet do we celebrate the enemy? I cannot say that this one in particular is an enemy at all but considering from where they hail (sports, in this case), within the distraction, I do not think it a far stretch that the enemy would use all sorts of tricks to deceive. Trying to get us focused on "planted" small "victories".
I am in no way upset with this person getting citizenship, I am glad they joined, and am in no way upset with the name change for them personally is that decision. To talk about it is to take away from focus on the battle field. We should be greatful, of course but I feel it necessary to be hesitant with such topics. Perhaps it does serve as a moral boost and I am overlooking the good for the potential bad.
I must also note that talking about anyone is considered gossip. This would be a sin and lends to my previous idea.
Look I'm giving you my love for your post, thank you for taking the time.
I'll just say I agree with you on your points, and funnily enough, after I replied to you the first time I came across another post about what some 'celeb' said.
And after that I kind of saw your point, some around here just post anything, even asinine shit some 'celeb' said or did. It gets tiring, I know now.
In regards to gossip I think its important to make a distinction between talking about someone and plain idle chatter.
I'm sure you know that already, it was just the smart ass in me replying to your 'talking about anyone is considered gossip '.
Nothing but Love from me, Fren. If I didn't love I would have allowed the thought and action to continue without recourse. I am not a fan of that particular thought and action.
Allow this to not be considered further rebuke but know that I am interested in having it seen as it is.
How are we able to talk about anyone if we do not "follow" them. We might not consider it as following and I am largely borrowing from "social media". It isn't our job to judge others, good or bad, but to love them as they are that they might understand love and turn to it. How often are people made "bad" by being denied love and how are we to turn it from bad if we continue to rebuke them over the actions they may have taken. Rather we should rebuke that which causes hate. I have no idea what the Father's plan is and to judge that which I cannot see via what I can would be nothing short of a rebuke of God's plan for his creation. Granted that none of what has been posted seems to be out of hate for this person it is far to easy to assume that this is not the Prize that we seek and we should remain focused. While idle chat may not always be considered gossip, it has gotten a stigma suggesting that it only be negative, it can easily evolve into. Much love and I appreciate the conversation!
Enes Freedom is no star, kek.
Hard working, aggressive role player and apparently Super Stud.
distraction nonetheless
I don't even watch NBA but I would love to get a Freedom jersey.🤔
Anyone that would buy any NBA merch is a moron.