The constitution does NOT provide the right to kill another human being. Life begins at conception. God gives life. God says, "Thou shalt not kill". Overturn Roe vs Wade and stop all this killing.
A better argument is that we don’t know when life starts, officially or technically, so how can we possibly determine when it’s appropriate to kill an unborn child? If no one agrees on when life starts, then you start it at the earliest possible point out of safety, and so you’re not a child butcher.
Precisely, the correct word to be used is murder not kill. This is why the cities of refuge were named to allow for the the accidental killing of another, and it also protected those related to the one accidentally killed, so they did not become guilty by murdering the slayer for the sake of revenge. Num35:9-34
They had great questions about the foundation of the supposed "right to abortion." It's very clear to me that they'll rule there is no right to abortion per-se. Indeed, they've never rule that women have a "right to abortion."
Just like the old "gay sex" case. A guy was charged with sodomy and claimed he had a right to have gay sex. He lost. Later another guy was charged with sodomy and he claimed he had a right to privacy. He said that the government can't come busting into people's bedrooms, snooping around their drawers, etc. He won.
Everyone has rights to privacy and I would also say reproductive autonomy. No one has a right to stop me from having kids. However, the court hasn't dealt with this "how do we handle substantive privacy rights" issue very well.
I would say the government should be able to ban sodomy and abortion, etc. but should also be barred from prosecuting it unless people voluntarily admit to doing it, or post pictures online, etc. Maybe states should be allowed to ban direct-to-consumer advertisements for dildos, porn, contraceptives, etc. However, how not authority to prevent stores from selling these products, or to prevent manufacturers from advertising to retailers. Doctors should be allowed to conduct abortions is a safe environment, but shouldn't be allowed to advertise it... because then they're admitting to conspiring to commit abortion.
Which... is how homosexuality and abortion have always been treated. It's private. It shouldn't be socially approved, etc. However, it's also not something the government should have the power to get too involved with.
The constitution does NOT provide the right to kill another human being. Life begins at conception. God gives life. God says, "Thou shalt not kill". Overturn Roe vs Wade and stop all this killing.
Did you listen to the audio clip above? I blew my mind that she actually said the phrase "fetal life" 🤯
Yes, I did watch it - very sick! Everyone knows that life begins at conception. Life is life. God will have the final say on this matter.
A better argument is that we don’t know when life starts, officially or technically, so how can we possibly determine when it’s appropriate to kill an unborn child? If no one agrees on when life starts, then you start it at the earliest possible point out of safety, and so you’re not a child butcher.
He said do not MURDER. Huge difference between “killing” and murder.
That's exactly right! Killing can be self-defense, accidental....
Precisely, the correct word to be used is murder not kill. This is why the cities of refuge were named to allow for the the accidental killing of another, and it also protected those related to the one accidentally killed, so they did not become guilty by murdering the slayer for the sake of revenge. Num35:9-34
They had great questions about the foundation of the supposed "right to abortion." It's very clear to me that they'll rule there is no right to abortion per-se. Indeed, they've never rule that women have a "right to abortion."
Just like the old "gay sex" case. A guy was charged with sodomy and claimed he had a right to have gay sex. He lost. Later another guy was charged with sodomy and he claimed he had a right to privacy. He said that the government can't come busting into people's bedrooms, snooping around their drawers, etc. He won.
Everyone has rights to privacy and I would also say reproductive autonomy. No one has a right to stop me from having kids. However, the court hasn't dealt with this "how do we handle substantive privacy rights" issue very well.
I would say the government should be able to ban sodomy and abortion, etc. but should also be barred from prosecuting it unless people voluntarily admit to doing it, or post pictures online, etc. Maybe states should be allowed to ban direct-to-consumer advertisements for dildos, porn, contraceptives, etc. However, how not authority to prevent stores from selling these products, or to prevent manufacturers from advertising to retailers. Doctors should be allowed to conduct abortions is a safe environment, but shouldn't be allowed to advertise it... because then they're admitting to conspiring to commit abortion.
Which... is how homosexuality and abortion have always been treated. It's private. It shouldn't be socially approved, etc. However, it's also not something the government should have the power to get too involved with.