It almost seems like the fashion industry intentionally redefined the traditional standards of beauty from “fit and healthy” to “strung-out heroin addict” so that these modeling agencies could act as cover for the child sex trafficking rings.
It never really made sense why they did that back in the ‘90s. It was like one day the standard went from “beautiful” to “anorexic runaway child” and nobody really questioned it outside of the overweight second wave feminists. Perhaps even that was intentionally designed to drive everyone away from it as an issue.
It’s speculation but it makes a lot of sense. This shift to “heroin chic” would have happened right around the time Clinton was in office, Epstein was in New York, and that Victoria’s Secret CEO was buddies with both of them. Nobody actually liked the heroin chic thing and it was really quite strange. They tried to sell it as the modern day update to Twiggy but even Twiggy was an anomaly, and besides that, she was just thin. She didn’t look trafficked. This pale, emaciated, unkempt, drugged-up look with the vacant glassy eyes as the new image of high fashion beauty was really its own thing.
E=mc² means energy and mass are the same so it's just basically saying epstien and this "modeling agency" are the same. But it also means everything that gains size loses energy so the bigger he got the more likely it was to fail harder. The equation has many meanings but those fit best. It's the universal language of math speaking (discovered and learned not invented), we don't have to listen. But when we do like this it's pretty interesting.
Yeah she had some really disgusting pictures of kids that looked like they were strung out so bad. She was using those photos to "promote" her modeling agency. The pictures she used to have on IG were bad too and the pictures of her friends IG accounts were bad.
Rachel ChildHandler......
Soon girl..... soon...!
WWG1WGA
It almost seems like the fashion industry intentionally redefined the traditional standards of beauty from “fit and healthy” to “strung-out heroin addict” so that these modeling agencies could act as cover for the child sex trafficking rings.
It never really made sense why they did that back in the ‘90s. It was like one day the standard went from “beautiful” to “anorexic runaway child” and nobody really questioned it outside of the overweight second wave feminists. Perhaps even that was intentionally designed to drive everyone away from it as an issue.
It’s speculation but it makes a lot of sense. This shift to “heroin chic” would have happened right around the time Clinton was in office, Epstein was in New York, and that Victoria’s Secret CEO was buddies with both of them. Nobody actually liked the heroin chic thing and it was really quite strange. They tried to sell it as the modern day update to Twiggy but even Twiggy was an anomaly, and besides that, she was just thin. She didn’t look trafficked. This pale, emaciated, unkempt, drugged-up look with the vacant glassy eyes as the new image of high fashion beauty was really its own thing.
Never made sense
A lot of popular gay designers started emerging around that time.
Is it any wonder models started looking like 12 year old boys?
Was about to make that connection
E=mc² means energy and mass are the same so it's just basically saying epstien and this "modeling agency" are the same. But it also means everything that gains size loses energy so the bigger he got the more likely it was to fail harder. The equation has many meanings but those fit best. It's the universal language of math speaking (discovered and learned not invented), we don't have to listen. But when we do like this it's pretty interesting.
I wondered when this bitch was going to wander back into the conversation. Chandler the Handler.
These sad lost souls. There will be a reality show about how we spoil the victims with kindness and a happy balance to their journey
were they all named "Rachel Chandler as a code?
I think that was put at the bottom of the photos for 1) to show agency and 2) to provide contact and code info.
as in "contact Rachel Handler." Ok, thanks. I get it now.
Yeah she had some really disgusting pictures of kids that looked like they were strung out so bad. She was using those photos to "promote" her modeling agency. The pictures she used to have on IG were bad too and the pictures of her friends IG accounts were bad.
You mean these aren’t mug shots?🤔
Directly. Rachel Chandler= Midland Agency. https://midland.agency/
YES!
These are pics of the "models" she promoted.
Rough life