Whether you meant to or not, you're not being hyperbolic in the slightest. Non-fulminant (mild) myocarditis still has a 56% mortality rate on a ten year timeline.
It’s not rocket science. These cardiac problems are old man problems. Once they start, it’s all downhill from there. Follow on mortality and complications are almost certain on a long enough timeline.
So now it’s not just old men who are going to need a lifetime of doctor visits, medication and follow up care to prevent mortality. It’s going to be young adults and 20 year olds.
When you give a 20 year old the heart of a 65 year old man with advanced coronary artery degradation, you get the same results.
Give it 5-10 years. All these people with “mild” carditis are going to end up dead of congestive heart failure.
Not just CHF, really take your pick of underlying cause for the cardiac episodes. Myo/pericarditis causes heart muscle to be squeezed against the pericardium; ten pounds of shit in a 5 pound sack analogy. That causes ischemia in the muscle and (hopefully not) nervous tissues of the heart. Even after blood flow comes back, the tissues don't regenerate. They turn into scar tissue that doesn't contract or conduct electricity. So not only are they giving them the heart of a geriatric with CAD, it's a geriatric with CAD who's already had a heart attack. Iirc the 5 year mortality rate was like 30%.
Somebody is going to find a way to make these companies pay
And think of how much money those people will pay to the pharma-medical industry while they are treating those heart problems that they paid for already once via the "vaccine."
In 5-10 years I still won't give a fuck that they are dying when they immediately wished death upon me for simply being cautious about taking an untested medical for the supposed greater good.
Gonna play Devil's Advocate here: 10 years is a long fucking time. Like, we'd expect roughly 13% mortality in general over 10 years for any cause picking people randomly. Before 2020, Myocarditis didn't just happen spontaneously and had some underlying causes, usually age. Older people do have a high mortality.
Thank you for the link. That paper focuses on treatment options, not so much surviability. Survival was cited from this paper: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16442915/
This paper says 56% survival rate after 5 years (44% mortality). Unfortunately the full text of this article is not available so I can't look at the mean/median age of the study group.
One item of note is that your linked article does mention dozens of non-age related causes of myocarditis, which contradicts my assumption that this was a matter of treating old people.
Whether you meant to or not, you're not being hyperbolic in the slightest. Non-fulminant (mild) myocarditis still has a 56% mortality rate on a ten year timeline.
Edit: spelling
It’s not rocket science. These cardiac problems are old man problems. Once they start, it’s all downhill from there. Follow on mortality and complications are almost certain on a long enough timeline.
So now it’s not just old men who are going to need a lifetime of doctor visits, medication and follow up care to prevent mortality. It’s going to be young adults and 20 year olds.
When you give a 20 year old the heart of a 65 year old man with advanced coronary artery degradation, you get the same results.
Give it 5-10 years. All these people with “mild” carditis are going to end up dead of congestive heart failure.
Not just CHF, really take your pick of underlying cause for the cardiac episodes. Myo/pericarditis causes heart muscle to be squeezed against the pericardium; ten pounds of shit in a 5 pound sack analogy. That causes ischemia in the muscle and (hopefully not) nervous tissues of the heart. Even after blood flow comes back, the tissues don't regenerate. They turn into scar tissue that doesn't contract or conduct electricity. So not only are they giving them the heart of a geriatric with CAD, it's a geriatric with CAD who's already had a heart attack. Iirc the 5 year mortality rate was like 30%.
Somebody is going to find a way to make these companies pay
And think of how much money those people will pay to the pharma-medical industry while they are treating those heart problems that they paid for already once via the "vaccine."
There's no profit in a cure.....
In 5-10 years I still won't give a fuck that they are dying when they immediately wished death upon me for simply being cautious about taking an untested medical for the supposed greater good.
Yeah autocorrect making me look dumb 🙄 lol.
Corrected it. Thanks 🤙
Gonna play Devil's Advocate here: 10 years is a long fucking time. Like, we'd expect roughly 13% mortality in general over 10 years for any cause picking people randomly. Before 2020, Myocarditis didn't just happen spontaneously and had some underlying causes, usually age. Older people do have a high mortality.
So I'd need more information to assess that stat.
Ctrl-f 56, to get to the referenced numbers - this is a link to an NIH study on a .gov address for anyone hesitant about suspicious links
Thank you for the link. That paper focuses on treatment options, not so much surviability. Survival was cited from this paper: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16442915/
This paper says 56% survival rate after 5 years (44% mortality). Unfortunately the full text of this article is not available so I can't look at the mean/median age of the study group.
One item of note is that your linked article does mention dozens of non-age related causes of myocarditis, which contradicts my assumption that this was a matter of treating old people.