See the sidebar. This isn't a board for anyone with any opinion particularly ones that generally run contrary to the board which the mods have even noticed and annointed this particular user with an addendum to their username regarding.
ARandomOgre was simply pointing out the real possibility of drug interactions.
Turning this forum into a censored echo chamber is exactly what the enemy would love.
Imagine how many blue-pilled skeptical normies will come here and ask critical questions of Q to learn more as the storm get's worse. Are we simply going to ban them all?
Horse shit. "Even if..." - "It can be dangerous if it interacts with something else" - which is almost nothing - it's the same kind of weasel words/scare tactics typical of the enemy here (MSM etc). In this case the person is in critical condition and danger of death, so in my own personal non-medical-professonal view, this possibility would be the least of my concerns.
"Legally problematic" - sure but again I personally would worry about that shit later. Just me again mind you.
Rather than continuing to debate each sentence, like I say it's the TONE from this person - and consistently so - that I'm objecting to. He's not some newbie that's wandered in here genuinely curious which would be a totally different situation.
And it's not an echo chamber - just there are some rules around things generally.
If we don't have free speech, then what do we represent? Debunk his arguments.
See the sidebar. This isn't a board for anyone with any opinion particularly ones that generally run contrary to the board which the mods have even noticed and annointed this particular user with an addendum to their username regarding.
ARandomOgre was simply pointing out the real possibility of drug interactions.
Turning this forum into a censored echo chamber is exactly what the enemy would love.
Imagine how many blue-pilled skeptical normies will come here and ask critical questions of Q to learn more as the storm get's worse. Are we simply going to ban them all?
Horse shit. "Even if..." - "It can be dangerous if it interacts with something else" - which is almost nothing - it's the same kind of weasel words/scare tactics typical of the enemy here (MSM etc). In this case the person is in critical condition and danger of death, so in my own personal non-medical-professonal view, this possibility would be the least of my concerns.
"Legally problematic" - sure but again I personally would worry about that shit later. Just me again mind you.
Rather than continuing to debate each sentence, like I say it's the TONE from this person - and consistently so - that I'm objecting to. He's not some newbie that's wandered in here genuinely curious which would be a totally different situation.
And it's not an echo chamber - just there are some rules around things generally.
u/#Byebye
I wish I had GAW credits for extra upvotes, because you would be getting a few from me right now.
You are 100 percent right. This RandomOgre is a troll. Look at his history. He is costing someone their life.
Ivermectin, already proven time and time again.