My thread lamenting the nothingness of th charges against Maxwell as opposed to the monstrous crimes we know about, has lije 25 updoots and 8 or so down. It's a popular sentiment. Teenaged girls who can birth children =/= children except according to statute.
Lol the lady posting her thing there, that was to demonstrate her weird issues w pleasing men. You are th ones always citing 2nd wave feminist rhetoric without realizing it. Im just ahead of that curve and goading people into cracking open some Dworkin, since you believe much of the same as her regarding heterosexual sex
You've just never talked with an honest woman in your life huh? Ivr never spoken to an adult woman about teenaged girls who didn't say some variety of "they know exactly what they're doing." Silly me considering testimony from my wife and mother and sister and friends.
This is not a good argument. Our entire system of laws is fraudulent.
What is a "woman" was only recently changed to be "18" (50 years or so?). In most of the world it still isn't 18. For most of human history (thousands and thousands of years) it was much younger. Right or wrong, it has not been "against the law" until relatively recently.
I am not supporting the actions of underage sex. I am not supporting preying on women. I am certainly not supporting anything that Maxwell or Epstein have done. I am saying using "against the law" as an argument given all we have learned about laws and our system of government is ludicrous.
The law we're talking about is statutory. It defines child, not in line with medical definitions
According to it many of our own ancestors even recently are sex offenders. Im just saying, it makes us seem like weird assholes to pretend that violating a statute is on par w podestas code parties. It's just not. That's indisputable.
Well my first question was a very innocent "how young?" I kept it going w elevated levels of inappropriateness in demonstration of a point. She kept answering in ways that seemed eager to garner approval.
What are you menstruating? Jesus the feelz here. It's not very reasoned of you
My thread lamenting the nothingness of th charges against Maxwell as opposed to the monstrous crimes we know about, has lije 25 updoots and 8 or so down. It's a popular sentiment. Teenaged girls who can birth children =/= children except according to statute.
Lol the lady posting her thing there, that was to demonstrate her weird issues w pleasing men. You are th ones always citing 2nd wave feminist rhetoric without realizing it. Im just ahead of that curve and goading people into cracking open some Dworkin, since you believe much of the same as her regarding heterosexual sex
The Maxwell trial isn't about adult models though so if you have made up your mind already for the case then you have made your bed.
Grooming involves targeting minors and not adult models.
You've just never talked with an honest woman in your life huh? Ivr never spoken to an adult woman about teenaged girls who didn't say some variety of "they know exactly what they're doing." Silly me considering testimony from my wife and mother and sister and friends.
The law doesn't support your argument.
So at this point here is your chance to clarify your position and view point on the trial which is about grooming minors and not adults.
This is not a good argument. Our entire system of laws is fraudulent.
What is a "woman" was only recently changed to be "18" (50 years or so?). In most of the world it still isn't 18. For most of human history (thousands and thousands of years) it was much younger. Right or wrong, it has not been "against the law" until relatively recently.
I am not supporting the actions of underage sex. I am not supporting preying on women. I am certainly not supporting anything that Maxwell or Epstein have done. I am saying using "against the law" as an argument given all we have learned about laws and our system of government is ludicrous.
The law we're talking about is statutory. It defines child, not in line with medical definitions According to it many of our own ancestors even recently are sex offenders. Im just saying, it makes us seem like weird assholes to pretend that violating a statute is on par w podestas code parties. It's just not. That's indisputable.
Also it's a popular opinion here. 2 dozen upvotes
You’re fucking delusional! The woman literally quoted SCRIPTURE and you accuse her of issues with man-pleasing! STFU!
Well my first question was a very innocent "how young?" I kept it going w elevated levels of inappropriateness in demonstration of a point. She kept answering in ways that seemed eager to garner approval.
What are you menstruating? Jesus the feelz here. It's not very reasoned of you
Dig your grave, you sick fuck.