You've just never talked with an honest woman in your life huh? Ivr never spoken to an adult woman about teenaged girls who didn't say some variety of "they know exactly what they're doing." Silly me considering testimony from my wife and mother and sister and friends.
This is not a good argument. Our entire system of laws is fraudulent.
What is a "woman" was only recently changed to be "18" (50 years or so?). In most of the world it still isn't 18. For most of human history (thousands and thousands of years) it was much younger. Right or wrong, it has not been "against the law" until relatively recently.
I am not supporting the actions of underage sex. I am not supporting preying on women. I am certainly not supporting anything that Maxwell or Epstein have done. I am saying using "against the law" as an argument given all we have learned about laws and our system of government is ludicrous.
The law we're talking about is statutory. It defines child, not in line with medical definitions
According to it many of our own ancestors even recently are sex offenders. Im just saying, it makes us seem like weird assholes to pretend that violating a statute is on par w podestas code parties. It's just not. That's indisputable.
The Maxwell trial isn't about adult models though so if you have made up your mind already for the case then you have made your bed.
Grooming involves targeting minors and not adult models.
You've just never talked with an honest woman in your life huh? Ivr never spoken to an adult woman about teenaged girls who didn't say some variety of "they know exactly what they're doing." Silly me considering testimony from my wife and mother and sister and friends.
The law doesn't support your argument.
So at this point here is your chance to clarify your position and view point on the trial which is about grooming minors and not adults.
This is not a good argument. Our entire system of laws is fraudulent.
What is a "woman" was only recently changed to be "18" (50 years or so?). In most of the world it still isn't 18. For most of human history (thousands and thousands of years) it was much younger. Right or wrong, it has not been "against the law" until relatively recently.
I am not supporting the actions of underage sex. I am not supporting preying on women. I am certainly not supporting anything that Maxwell or Epstein have done. I am saying using "against the law" as an argument given all we have learned about laws and our system of government is ludicrous.
The Maxwell trial is based on the current laws on the books. You have fallen for the bait set out by the poster.
They are conflating human sexual behavior and psychology with what is defined by the law.
Maxwell is on trial for violating the law by grooming minors and trafficking them.
The law we're talking about is statutory. It defines child, not in line with medical definitions According to it many of our own ancestors even recently are sex offenders. Im just saying, it makes us seem like weird assholes to pretend that violating a statute is on par w podestas code parties. It's just not. That's indisputable.
Also it's a popular opinion here. 2 dozen upvotes
Maxwell faces 70 years in prison which is major and you keep dismissing it which tells me you don't care about the seriousness of the trial.
Also, those podesta parties are possible because of people like Maxwell.
Justice must come for all of them when they violate the law.