Thanks. I don't see it that way. Limited? Au Contraire. I think my view is much, much broader than those who subscribe so vehemently, and confidently (like newly converted religious believers) to the double theory.
Jeepers. The entire Q project has/had a core focus on applying critical thinking, due diligence, using logic, reasoning, and a very evidence-based approach to processing information.
The evidence is VERY limited, imo. Just for starters, there are 100 amateurs who proclaim, with every confidence "just look at these pictures! See! Seeee!!!!???"
That's a deeply non-evidence-based conclusion. In my view, it has ALL the hallmarks of belief, not really rational evidence based reasoning and logic.
For example, are there other plausible explanations for the apparent differences that some people see? Certainly. When there are other possible explanations, its more a matter of 'belief' to choose one over the other without considering other forms of evidence.
Aging can and does affect our physiognomy, and appearance.
Plastic surgery and other medical interventions can certainly affect our physiognomy, and appearance.
As I stated in a recent comment, to give the double theory any really credibility to start with, I would really prefer (or need) to see a deep, thorough analysis by anatomical experts, people who have studied the human physiognomy and anatomy as specialists for a very significant time. Such an analysis would carry some weight. Why? Because it would be based on much, much more than just the "look! See! It's obvious".
I'm a trained linguist and have a good degree of training in textual analysis. I can take a body of text, and analyse it on maybe 10 different levels at least - analysis that can backup or debunk various conclusions that 'layperson's come to when dealing with text (i.e. reading an article in a paper, or a document, or comments, etc). Even though pretty much ALL English literate humans can read a text, what one accesses by deep and professionally developed analysis is on a whole different level.
Likewise, have you ever listened that person doing body language analysis breakdowns of different speakers - someone who was (or maybe still is) posting on ytube? That person has been trained in forensic levels of body language analysis.
So, to me, for the double theory to have any credibility to start with, I think I'd need some actual data-based information as opposed to just amateurs drawing conclusions based on their own limited impressions and views.
I mean, the theory could be right; I'm not saying it's not possible. All I'm saying is, it doesn't work within my approach to life in general but especially Q-related stuff, to buy into something without a certain threshold of evidence. It just seems to me irresponsible to adopt a belief without that level of due diligence. At least, I'm not willing to choose a belief - I take such choices quite seriously.
Other elements of evidence that I so far do not see:
Reasoning. WHY do body doubles? What would be the logical, reason-based NEED or Benefit of doing all that? How would it serve?
What other elements would such an action be predicated on? What other elements would need to be in place for it to even work? What is the entire framework required? (many potential massive factors would need to be accounted for)
How would that be managed? Who would know, who would not know? How would that be controlled? Could that be practically controlled in any reasonable way? If so, how? Militarily, forensically, etc?
etc.
This, in my view, is what due diligence looks like. And, for an operation of this scale, it would require massive control of massive numbers of factors. etc.
Q3906
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
You can substitute "belief" here for revelation, imo.
I'm wondering if you seriously still think such an approach (view) is limited.
Or should we just phone Austin Steinbart and ask him if it's true? /sarc.
I personally dont believe a lot of folks have been replaced, but I do believe Biden has been and I have 3 reasons for that.
He looks obviously different. Whenever I see a picture of Biden I immediately go "He is the new Biden" or "He is the old Biden". That by itself would not be enough to sway me, still.
Trump hinted that "he had been shot" and a trolled a lot more - all indicative that Biden had been replaced.
If we are in Devolution, there is no way they would allow a real criminal to have the reins. The post of "president" must be held by someone completely under White Hat control. I cannot imagine real Biden being given that small chance to upset the apple cart.
Now, let me try and answer your questions:
Reasoning. WHY do body doubles? What would be the logical, reason-based NEED or Benefit of doing all that? How would it serve?
There are two broad reasons. First is for White Hats to replace someone with a double, so they can use that person to entrap others higher up.
Second, if someone was taken out without being made public because that person did not co-operate, or they are just too dangerous to be allowed alive, then the Black Hats could easily fill in that void and maintain the illusion of that person being alive, so they could try and capitalise this person's identity. Remembers, black hats are always competing against each other all the time, within some hard boundaries.
What other elements would such an action be predicated on? What other elements would need to be in place for it to even work? What is the entire framework required? (many potential massive factors would need to be accounted for)
At the very least - not a whole lot. A good handler and some way to track them (chipped perhaps) and good motivation to ensure they follow the orders (either they are proven white hats themselves, or the double has kompromat)
How would that be managed? Who would know, who would not know? How would that be controlled? Could that be practically controlled in any reasonable way? If so, how? Militarily, forensically, etc?
A lot of times the family knows, but they go along with it since they themselves have been compromised, or they want to make the best of the situation such as keeping their social positions, social illusions etc for as long as possible.
Sometimes its possible [they] knew it was a replacement and they end up replacing the replacement, and the WHs handle that situation just like they would handle a normal black hat.
Hillary has a double and we know that for sure. Pictures of her 10 years ago show her TODAY at least 10” shorter. Then you have the whole ‘ankle monitor’ scenario. While that’s another rabbit hole we probably don’t want to go down, but both McCain and Biden have showed up with it on the opposite leg. Maybe they just forgot?.
Thanks. I don't see it that way. Limited? Au Contraire. I think my view is much, much broader than those who subscribe so vehemently, and confidently (like newly converted religious believers) to the double theory.
Jeepers. The entire Q project has/had a core focus on applying critical thinking, due diligence, using logic, reasoning, and a very evidence-based approach to processing information.
The evidence is VERY limited, imo. Just for starters, there are 100 amateurs who proclaim, with every confidence "just look at these pictures! See! Seeee!!!!???"
That's a deeply non-evidence-based conclusion. In my view, it has ALL the hallmarks of belief, not really rational evidence based reasoning and logic.
For example, are there other plausible explanations for the apparent differences that some people see? Certainly. When there are other possible explanations, its more a matter of 'belief' to choose one over the other without considering other forms of evidence.
Aging can and does affect our physiognomy, and appearance.
Plastic surgery and other medical interventions can certainly affect our physiognomy, and appearance.
As I stated in a recent comment, to give the double theory any really credibility to start with, I would really prefer (or need) to see a deep, thorough analysis by anatomical experts, people who have studied the human physiognomy and anatomy as specialists for a very significant time. Such an analysis would carry some weight. Why? Because it would be based on much, much more than just the "look! See! It's obvious".
I'm a trained linguist and have a good degree of training in textual analysis. I can take a body of text, and analyse it on maybe 10 different levels at least - analysis that can backup or debunk various conclusions that 'layperson's come to when dealing with text (i.e. reading an article in a paper, or a document, or comments, etc). Even though pretty much ALL English literate humans can read a text, what one accesses by deep and professionally developed analysis is on a whole different level.
Likewise, have you ever listened that person doing body language analysis breakdowns of different speakers - someone who was (or maybe still is) posting on ytube? That person has been trained in forensic levels of body language analysis.
So, to me, for the double theory to have any credibility to start with, I think I'd need some actual data-based information as opposed to just amateurs drawing conclusions based on their own limited impressions and views.
I mean, the theory could be right; I'm not saying it's not possible. All I'm saying is, it doesn't work within my approach to life in general but especially Q-related stuff, to buy into something without a certain threshold of evidence. It just seems to me irresponsible to adopt a belief without that level of due diligence. At least, I'm not willing to choose a belief - I take such choices quite seriously.
Other elements of evidence that I so far do not see:
Reasoning. WHY do body doubles? What would be the logical, reason-based NEED or Benefit of doing all that? How would it serve?
What other elements would such an action be predicated on? What other elements would need to be in place for it to even work? What is the entire framework required? (many potential massive factors would need to be accounted for)
How would that be managed? Who would know, who would not know? How would that be controlled? Could that be practically controlled in any reasonable way? If so, how? Militarily, forensically, etc?
etc.
This, in my view, is what due diligence looks like. And, for an operation of this scale, it would require massive control of massive numbers of factors. etc.
Q3906
You can substitute "belief" here for revelation, imo.
I'm wondering if you seriously still think such an approach (view) is limited.
Or should we just phone Austin Steinbart and ask him if it's true? /sarc.
Thanks for reading.
Well, i do like strategy, and I'm pretty smart in some areas, but I would not really say..... I'm cunning.
Not recently, anyway.
I personally dont believe a lot of folks have been replaced, but I do believe Biden has been and I have 3 reasons for that.
He looks obviously different. Whenever I see a picture of Biden I immediately go "He is the new Biden" or "He is the old Biden". That by itself would not be enough to sway me, still.
Trump hinted that "he had been shot" and a trolled a lot more - all indicative that Biden had been replaced.
If we are in Devolution, there is no way they would allow a real criminal to have the reins. The post of "president" must be held by someone completely under White Hat control. I cannot imagine real Biden being given that small chance to upset the apple cart.
Now, let me try and answer your questions:
There are two broad reasons. First is for White Hats to replace someone with a double, so they can use that person to entrap others higher up.
Second, if someone was taken out without being made public because that person did not co-operate, or they are just too dangerous to be allowed alive, then the Black Hats could easily fill in that void and maintain the illusion of that person being alive, so they could try and capitalise this person's identity. Remembers, black hats are always competing against each other all the time, within some hard boundaries.
At the very least - not a whole lot. A good handler and some way to track them (chipped perhaps) and good motivation to ensure they follow the orders (either they are proven white hats themselves, or the double has kompromat)
A lot of times the family knows, but they go along with it since they themselves have been compromised, or they want to make the best of the situation such as keeping their social positions, social illusions etc for as long as possible.
Sometimes its possible [they] knew it was a replacement and they end up replacing the replacement, and the WHs handle that situation just like they would handle a normal black hat.
Hillary has a double and we know that for sure. Pictures of her 10 years ago show her TODAY at least 10” shorter. Then you have the whole ‘ankle monitor’ scenario. While that’s another rabbit hole we probably don’t want to go down, but both McCain and Biden have showed up with it on the opposite leg. Maybe they just forgot?.
Well, at least your thinking about this and analysing. That's good.
We need more of this from our pedes.
The way you talk about devolution makes me think it's all BS.
Of course you would say that! ;)
Excellent reply!
I thought I was the only one who says that. My 20-something daughter has hipped the word up by shortening it to jeeps.
Thanks for articulating my dooming about this whole thing.
It’s hard to dispute tippy-top, no name death prediction, 30 or zero deltas … but Xiden is really just a mask on Jim Carey ? That dog don’t hunt.
lol