I don’t care what the date is on the article. I care about the Content.
I care that people that don’t know about this, are waking up and being able to read it today. That’s all I care about
Who cares if it was released six months ago, or today, or both. The fact of the matter is that the information is getting brought back to the forefront again.
If they had this posted in the beginning of the article, LIKE THEY ARE JOURNALISTICALLY REQUIRED, then there would be no issue. You're allowing your love of the content to blind you from the principle.
As it stands, this is clickbait and an old article posing as news (in order to get more click$$$).
I don’t care about the date. How many times do I need to tell you that. All I care is at the cottage is available to wake people up. God people are so stupid here
Right. Because MSM is ethical!
Are you being thick on purpose? OP posted a NEW ARTICLE that presents OLD NEWS
I don’t care!
I don’t care what the date is on the article. I care about the Content.
I care that people that don’t know about this, are waking up and being able to read it today. That’s all I care about
Who cares if it was released six months ago, or today, or both. The fact of the matter is that the information is getting brought back to the forefront again.
If they had this posted in the beginning of the article, LIKE THEY ARE JOURNALISTICALLY REQUIRED, then there would be no issue. You're allowing your love of the content to blind you from the principle.
As it stands, this is clickbait and an old article posing as news (in order to get more click$$$).
I don’t care about the date. How many times do I need to tell you that. All I care is at the cottage is available to wake people up. God people are so stupid here