If this were ACTUALLY a psyop and Trump were a turn coat, they would've just rammed through everything they've wanted to do in the senate with the help of the RINOs to overcome Manchin and Sinema. Literally 2 people basically control the Senate, and by extension the entire federal government.
Think about that. It's not hard to overcome the 2 person vote when you account for the RINOs. Romney, McConnell, Murkowski, Graham. Right there, with just those 4 high profile RINOs you have double the vote needed to overcome Manchin and Sinema and ram through every single corrupt bill they wanted.
The fact that they're all being leashed and forced to vote on party lines on the majority of the big bills that would destroy the US or change it permanently tells you they're not in control.
I've been thinking about this. I think both sides have blackmail:
Deep state has limited dirt on folks. Limited ammo. And it isn't always raping kids. It's probably a lot softer than that in most cases. Bribes. Lying. Etc...
The Patriots have much of the same material and more, because they can reveal all the secrets the deep state needs to keep secret. So they have access to double the blackmail.
The difference is that the deep state needs to spend this ammo wisely. They only have so much of it. And they can't throw away these corrupt people, because there as only so many of them too. So they resort to threats vs actually doing most the time.
Compare that with the Patriots. If they win, they could potentially jail or even execute ALL of these people. They don't need to be reserved.
That's a big difference.
So when we think of Patriots in control, think about a split vote where both the deep state and patriots are competing for votes. Think about how much easier it is for the Patriots to squeeze like crazy - because they can afford to spend this ammo and have these people quit. That's actually almost as good as prosecuting them.
White Hats are not blackmailing people. The Q team went to great lengths to follow the law and create thousands and thousands of sealed indictments. NSA used FISA to surveil (but did so legally unlike the Obama administration). Trump was very clear that they are the party of law and order. They are not blackmailing.
However, they do have all the evidence. Durham has full control of the sealed indictments that are full of evidence that Bill Barr declassified to Grand Jury. Upon unsealing that evidence is declassed to the public. This can be triggered at any time.
A person is arrested and then the indictment is unsealed, not the reverse. After the trial (unless a judge orders otherwise) the evidence is then declassed to the public.
This is the white hats ammo. The timing is up to the Durham team. Sealed indictments hang over your head and the government can hold onto them for up to 5 years without unsealing.
That is not the same as black mail. It leashes many black hat figures because they could be arrested at any moment if the indictment is unsealed.
Black hats use illegally obtained and sometimes fabricated information to control people as well as death threats and MS to coerce people.
Completely different methods. White Hats are not blackmailing, coercing or use illegal methods to control others. People forget there is a LOT the government can do to you that is within the law. Usually the people suffer this, but right now its the black hats feeling the pain.
Good clarification on the language. It has the same effect either way, but I agree that it's a lawful process.
LEt me get this straight:
Blackhat: if you do this for me, these disgusting pictures and stories will stay hidden and you' ll have a lot of money, and the cherry on top, to secure your next election, dominion systems will be set to elect you.
White hat: if you do this for me, we' ll be able to work out a deal. Ok, you' ll have to resign and support our plan for the time being, and you will be able to retire and enjoy a couple of years with your family. If not, well ... leavenworth will be walk in the park for you. With these disgusting pictures and stories coming out, I do not value your life for 1 penny.
Now tell me. What is the difference? Blackmail vs Whitemail?
Your entire argument is based on your own hypothetical. It's just your opinion.
You are saying essentially, "What if hypothetically the white hats are telling people that they have to resign, support our plan... would that hypothetically be different than the Derp State blackmail?"
I'd still say yes even in your imagined scenario, but I don't agree with your imagined scenario. For one thing it leaves out people like Admiral Mike Rogers and Mike Flynn who fooled the Derp State and got into powerful positions within the Obama Administration. They might have looked like black hats, but they were white hats. We don't actually know those who have only been pretending to be black hats, but were white hats all along.
Q said "There are more good than bad" implying that white hats may be more numerous than we realize.
We also don't know if the Derp State is forcing out some of these out because they suspect they talked. Too many unknowns.
I disagree.
Trump was very clear that they are the party of law and order. Q went to great lengths to do the posts in a way that followed Natsec guidelines. Following the law seemed an absolute necessity to Q so I don't agree with your speculation. Whatever is going on with the white hats side is 100% by the law in my opinion.
But like you, I'm just speculating.
?????
Speculation? Wow, are you triggered or what?
I gave you two scenario' s. These scenario' s are real live scenario' s. As a matter of fact, Q mentioned that deals were made up to a point in time where the door to deals was shut.
Within this context, my scenario' s are playing out.
For you well educated common core smarties out here: goto qagg.news and enter in the search bar the word: deal. You will find 95 posts containing this phrase.
Q 2565 dated 12/10/18 and Q15 dated 10/31/17. The latter is first in line and details deals have to be made because of the level of corruption. Even reaching out to certain players have been done. The former post is the final no deals posts. The door is shut.
So, now you are starting to see what I wrote?
Be that as it may, my question was not about whether or not it happens. My question is: what is the difference?
It is a logical response to your exclamation claim:
Really? The process is exactly the same. In both cases a deal is proposed. A deal is commerce requiring both side to assess the advantage of the deal, to assess the value of the equity in question depending on the position of power they occupy in the, I almost would have said negotiation, but that would presuppose a negative state of being, so. ... I' ll maintain the idea of haggling to set terms to be agreed to.
Your disagreement is duly noted, yet totally unfounded.
O and one more thing: speculation. To speculate requires a tangible form from observation. Otherwise it is nothing than being an air-guitarist. Entertaining, but hardly substantial. As the Latin goes: