https://freeatlantis.com/@h53pilot
I love the government in exile theory being discussed by @SLAG. I watched his interview with Patel Patriot last night. Great stuff.
I agree wholeheartedly with most of it. However, I don't think Trump would count on SCOTUS being our last hope. Especially after what it demonstrated from Nov 3rd, 2020 to Jan 20th, 2021.
With that in the rearview mirror, I don't understand how we could roll the dice on them anymore. Not when the fate of the nation is on the line… But government in exile? Yes.
High military involvement? Yes.
The WWII parallels are terrific.
I have (as many know... of course!) proposed an alternative solution that does not rely on ANY element of the corrupted federal government (that we know of publicly, that is).
It completely bypasses the entire thing.
A solution where the SCOTUS has no say whatever. In fact, this solution would, in effect, tell SCOTUS to sit down and shut up…
The solution is the union of states, having been offered, and having accepted an alternative federal authority (the makeup of which could be in many forms), which has left any D.C. authority entirely out of the loop.
In other words, D.C. has been completely neutered. Any legacy government structure the deep state and the CCP depends on no longer has any authority, even though it might appear to…
But that is only long enough for the appointed federal authority to ready the field for legitimate elections and to rid the country of foreign elements that could sabotage the effort before revealing what reality is…
To state plainly, Trump was able to coordinate with state legislatures to gain 75% ratification for the solution he prepared and offered them in the event the system (including SCOTUS) could not rectify the election fraud.
SCOTUS WAS an option before Jan 20th. It was tested before our eyes. It failed the test, in my opinion, when it rejected the Texas case...
The solution Trump could have offered was:
-
an alternative federal authority;
-
draft Constitutional changes to legitimately transfer authorities to the alternative authority Trump prepared;
-
a mechanism by which PORTIONS of state legislatures could be clandestinely briefed on the treason and the prepared solution
-
it was turn-key from the state legislators' point of view.
So... this would require little to no effort on state legislators' part...
Trump did ALL the work and implemented it secretly through a mechanism that he controlled and could withhold any knowledge of except those he chose to inform.
I realize many people might think it would be impossible to get so many legislators to agree, let alone, not spill the beans. I disagree.
I think it would be quite feasible. Especially if Trump did all the legwork and all they had to do was nod their heads in astonishment.
He pulled up in a Maserati and said, "get in..."
Here's why it could have happened (we'll go to the how after that):
Given that Trump knew (likely even before 2016) that the uni-party had been fixing elections for a long time, he had war gamed this out, at a minimum after he won in 2016.
With multiple courses of action (COAs) at the ready, he embarked on draining the swamp.
One of those COAs would have been what I'm talking about...
So, I'm not proposing it was cobbled together after the Democrats stole the House in 2018, or after COVID hit (unplanned event) in late 2019, or after the system failed us post Nov 2020.
I'm saying it was one of many potential COAs developed a long time ago and that, as events occurred, some COAs were winnowed out until this one was the only one left standing...
especially after SCOTUS totally failed us post-2020 election…
I think we would all agree, on this forum at least, that no one would know the legal and Constitutional aspects of all the COAs better than Trump.
And I think the COA of "let the system work it out or fail," was one COA that ran its course.
The People had to see the system fail.
Perhaps Trump even hoped it would work, although this final COA is the solution to end ALL elements of the deep state. For a very long time, at least. There will be nothing left…
In fact, there WOULD be nothing legally left even now except a ghost of itself. Everything we're seeing could fit into this theory.
We wouldn't have to worry about what SCOTUS will do anymore.
The swamp wasn't just drained. It was nuked.
It had to be. SCOTUS plainly demonstrated this…
The "why" is that this solution allows, over the next 3-5 years, the gradual, methodical, and complete build-back of the federal government, under the watchful eye of the union of states - the REAL authority and voice of The People.
No more deep state foot-dragging and sabotage of the effort.
They're gone completely. The only thing left is the military, whose leadership can be replaced in an instant. ALL other federal authorities are null and void… This solution relegates the military to its proper place... an instrument of The People, not their savior or master.
How could this have been implemented? I'll write more on that tonight or tomorrow.
But think Executive Orders, and one in particular. EO 13848. And its timing.
It enabled the 2-year information collection effort; the results of which Trump could have sitting in the passenger seat of his Maserati.
I have to admit I have not delved too deeply into the Sovereign Citizen concept because I like the idea of organized governance and it appeared to me they want to do away with that almost entirely.
I like the idea of smaller, elected, localized governance working under term limits with delegates overseeing elements of national interest, such as a standing army etc.
I do believe we're still under a British-style court system, not necessarily controlled by them.
We have a "judge" that has far too much power, "holding court" like the nobles of old. They have the power to dismiss a lot of things, like evidence or whole cases. They use "contempt of court" as a hammer to keep people in submission and in obedience to their dictates.
You "rise" now, instead of kneeling.
I firmly believe that 1) we're currently living under British Common Law, 2) "judges" are tyrants in black robes, and 3) "judges" are lower nobility, "holding court" just like their noble forebears.
Like the Constitution says not to have?
Are you are giving us some hint that there's a lil' Libertarian hiding under your MAGA exterior Kat?