The headline is misleading. It had me fooled too. It makes it sound like Twitter censored Dorsey. That's not what happened. An individual Twitter account blocked him after he criticized their company.
Andressen was one of the inventors of the web, he also eventually became a filthy rich VC, probably a cabalist, but Andreesen Horowitz owns half of silicon valley.
Perhaps revealing in that it suggests that boardseats held by Silverlake and Elliott Mgt played a role in his ouster? Perhaps Those two helped get Andressen Horowitz a seat at the table too?
Perhaps revealing in that it suggests that boardseats held by Silverlake and Elliott Mgt played a role in his ouster? Perhaps Those two helped get Andressen Horowitz a seat at the table too?
Karma is a Biatch hey...
The headline is misleading. It had me fooled too. It makes it sound like Twitter censored Dorsey. That's not what happened. An individual Twitter account blocked him after he criticized their company.
Why we do care someone blocked him?
Also why is a national news story that some company blocked him?
If it were actually Twitter then it would at least be funny.
Andressen was one of the inventors of the web, he also eventually became a filthy rich VC, probably a cabalist, but Andreesen Horowitz owns half of silicon valley.
Perhaps revealing in that it suggests that boardseats held by Silverlake and Elliott Mgt played a role in his ouster? Perhaps Those two helped get Andressen Horowitz a seat at the table too?
Perhaps revealing in that it suggests that boardseats held by Silverlake and Elliott Mgt played a role in his ouster? Perhaps Those two helped get Andressen Horowitz a seat at the table too?