Makes for a great TV series. But this is all fantasy. There is no evidence and no technology. You can believe in you gut all you want to, but your gut has no I.Q.
I have already provided one piece of evidence of the navy destroyer video. Here is the second piece, https://patents.google.com/patent/US20060145019A1/en
A patent for a triangular spacecraft from the US navy.
So instead of relying on broad sweeping dismissal of my evidence based on nothing but your gut feeling that you are right, why don’t you refute my evidence? Are you suggesting both of these items are fantasy? That you have a high iQ?
Let me give you a tip. Next time you should say this is fantasy because.... Or you are wrong because..... and then you actually say something useful and productive to prove my assertion is not correct.
You sound like a vaxxer. CNN hasn’t told you the navy most likely is testing alien propulsion for next gen drones, so you just ignore video of the fucking thing and the godamn patent for it, and refer to these things as fantasy, even though you can see them with your own eyes.
Evidence of what? Imagination? Drones fly around with multiple small rotors. No anti-gravity involved or necessary.
Let me give you a tip. Work in the industry for 40 years and soak up some understanding. You are the one trying to prove something that is literally incredible, so your proofs ought to be verifiable. Waving a video proves nothing---as all my Moon Hoax friends (ha!) would be glad to agree.
I don't watch CNN and they don't send me any memos. As for the invention, it looks like it takes some inspiration from the Biefeld-Brown effect, and by the stressed field work that has been studied by NASA (failure) and by the Russians (success). Reminds me of the de Seversky ionocraft, but they did not scale up beyond tabletop demonstrators.
Lol ok. Your incredible genius didn’t even notice the drones in the navy video don’t make noise. Those aren’t standard drones powered by blades. I didn’t leak them. I didn’t make the claim that they are unidentified. I didn’t create the claim they were silent and hovered around the ship for hours. The Pentagon did.
You should take this old smart guy shtick to the pentagon and explain to them clearly those are nothing more than DJI drones with some construction paper on them.
I swear dunning kruger just pours off of you in sheets.
Okay. I went back to review the video and your framework claims. The video is only a question mark. There is nothing to indicate really what is going on. Not that nothing is going on, only that there is nothing to indicate what. It is not possible to determine whether the imagery you refer to is a real image or an image artifact (as the narrator mentions). Image artifacts, by the way, don't make noise. That was imagery from a low-light-level or IR camera, so it is a little difficult to translate that into conventional viewing. If they were standard drones, you wouldn't see the rotors anyway. And the Navy did not claim they were their systems.
Let us suppose that is alien technology, which I have no objection to. It simply does not bear up your fantasy that WE have it somewhere and are using it. That is the point that I was rejecting.
You have some idea that I scoff at UFOs? I've been interested in them since George Adamski published his books (sadly, he was a fraud, but very seductive). They first showed up in World War II (Foo Fighters). There is plenty of material out there, as exposed by Major Donald Keyhoe and MUFON. The stuff we've seen lately is only recent, not new. Alien technology is the most credible explanation in my view---but we don't have any of it. Not a particle. That sort of thing would eventually seep out, even among the classified community, if you consider what sort of technology is classified. (Which I do, having held a Top Secret and Compartmented clearances through my career. I was even on track to get a Q clearance from the DoE, but circumstances took a turn otherwise.)
Makes for a great TV series. But this is all fantasy. There is no evidence and no technology. You can believe in you gut all you want to, but your gut has no I.Q.
Is that the best you got to play the smart guy?
I have already provided one piece of evidence of the navy destroyer video. Here is the second piece, https://patents.google.com/patent/US20060145019A1/en A patent for a triangular spacecraft from the US navy.
So instead of relying on broad sweeping dismissal of my evidence based on nothing but your gut feeling that you are right, why don’t you refute my evidence? Are you suggesting both of these items are fantasy? That you have a high iQ?
Let me give you a tip. Next time you should say this is fantasy because.... Or you are wrong because..... and then you actually say something useful and productive to prove my assertion is not correct.
You sound like a vaxxer. CNN hasn’t told you the navy most likely is testing alien propulsion for next gen drones, so you just ignore video of the fucking thing and the godamn patent for it, and refer to these things as fantasy, even though you can see them with your own eyes.
dunning-kruger
Evidence of what? Imagination? Drones fly around with multiple small rotors. No anti-gravity involved or necessary.
Let me give you a tip. Work in the industry for 40 years and soak up some understanding. You are the one trying to prove something that is literally incredible, so your proofs ought to be verifiable. Waving a video proves nothing---as all my Moon Hoax friends (ha!) would be glad to agree.
I don't watch CNN and they don't send me any memos. As for the invention, it looks like it takes some inspiration from the Biefeld-Brown effect, and by the stressed field work that has been studied by NASA (failure) and by the Russians (success). Reminds me of the de Seversky ionocraft, but they did not scale up beyond tabletop demonstrators.
Lol ok. Your incredible genius didn’t even notice the drones in the navy video don’t make noise. Those aren’t standard drones powered by blades. I didn’t leak them. I didn’t make the claim that they are unidentified. I didn’t create the claim they were silent and hovered around the ship for hours. The Pentagon did.
You should take this old smart guy shtick to the pentagon and explain to them clearly those are nothing more than DJI drones with some construction paper on them.
I swear dunning kruger just pours off of you in sheets.
Okay. I went back to review the video and your framework claims. The video is only a question mark. There is nothing to indicate really what is going on. Not that nothing is going on, only that there is nothing to indicate what. It is not possible to determine whether the imagery you refer to is a real image or an image artifact (as the narrator mentions). Image artifacts, by the way, don't make noise. That was imagery from a low-light-level or IR camera, so it is a little difficult to translate that into conventional viewing. If they were standard drones, you wouldn't see the rotors anyway. And the Navy did not claim they were their systems.
Let us suppose that is alien technology, which I have no objection to. It simply does not bear up your fantasy that WE have it somewhere and are using it. That is the point that I was rejecting.
You have some idea that I scoff at UFOs? I've been interested in them since George Adamski published his books (sadly, he was a fraud, but very seductive). They first showed up in World War II (Foo Fighters). There is plenty of material out there, as exposed by Major Donald Keyhoe and MUFON. The stuff we've seen lately is only recent, not new. Alien technology is the most credible explanation in my view---but we don't have any of it. Not a particle. That sort of thing would eventually seep out, even among the classified community, if you consider what sort of technology is classified. (Which I do, having held a Top Secret and Compartmented clearances through my career. I was even on track to get a Q clearance from the DoE, but circumstances took a turn otherwise.)
there are literally patents for this shit already. just like covid and its vaccine were patented years ago.
Lmao man are you gonna have your reality shattered.