An anon I met IRL sent me a really interesting theory, but is unable to post it because he's still a handshake on this forum. We are both interested to see what y'all think. The text is copied/pasted below but here is the link if you're curious.:
https://greatawakening.win/p/140vf5cEeH/ive-been-a-long-time-stalker-her/
I've been a long time stalker here but I decided to create an account to share this theory or possibly connection between CERN and Q with you all
These are just some thoughts I've had lately that might be worth unpacking... idk Here goes some things that I'm putting together, and why I'm now wondering if Q is CERN but with new leadership.
Mandela Effect is real. CERN figured out how to change the past and who knows what else back in 2012. If you don't believe me, watch this documentary: https://www.bitchute.com/video/7UeRYtIYfERr/ -- Say what you will about people misremembering things, but I know for a fact that Ed McMahon used to work for Publishers Clearing House. It's a hill that I'm willing to die on. I'm 39 and I have vivid memories of him showing up on people's doorsteps with $1MM checks in those commercials. Not to mention the fact that Golden Girls and Friends episodes confirm this. And don't be manipulated by trending Mandela Effect posts on social media. They are nothing but branding and logo changes designed to make us look foolish because anyone with two brain cells can figure companies rebrand all the freakin time.
I asked myself yesterday, "Is there any chance that CERN accomplished this feat and weren't immediately co-opted by at least one government??" I concluded the answer is no. It's not possible that world governments just let them do their thing with no oversight or control. So, who took control of CERN? Obama is a lazy ass. The guy legit left 200+ open seats for judges when he left office. He could have put his own people in those seats, but he's a lazy ass and doesn't like to work, so he left them open for Trump. Trump had them filled within weeks. My point here is that it's plausible that Obama didn't give a shit about CERN, and even if he did, he was too busy with other insignificant things like his cover photo on GQ Magazine, leaving the door wide open for someone else to take over CERN.
I have been thinking for the better part of this year that Q didn't plan any of what they have warned us about. I believe it's impossible that things are going according to plan this well. My point is there's a difference between having a plan, and being in control. I can't even have an argument with someone in my head that goes as well as Q's "predictions" for the future have gone. It seems like every other day I'm seeing a Q post that describes EXACTLY what's happening right now. It's insane. I believe that the only way Q can be this accurate is if they've already watched it in realtime (they're from the future -- or present, but controlling the past gives them control of the future).
Back when Lindell came out with the news about the packet captures, he interviewed an active duty Space Force guy (I think?)... maybe his last name was Foster? Don't take my word for it on his name... anyway Lindell asked him if Q was real. He replied with something like, "Yes, Q is a group of 600 men and women." I watched a documentary about CERN on Gaia TV a few months ago. Do you know how many scientists they said CERN was made up of? You guessed it. 600. I've seen "Future proves past" in so many Q posts. What in the world does that mean? I still don't know, but it sounds like a statement that someone who controls the future and the past would make.
Do you know how long the large hadron collider is? It’s 17 miles long. Coincidence? My theory based on all of the points above: White Hats in our government saw that our corrupt gov officials weren't paying any attention to what was going on with CERN, so they quietly took control of it themselves, used their tech to install Trump via things like having Comey bring charges against Hillary during the election, and then continue to use it to guide us into truly emptying the swamp, so to speak. The main question I have right now, though, is if they can bring Mandela back, who else can they bring back? If they can change the past, then are some of the videos and information that we're being introduced to now actually brand new even though they were filmed years or decades ago?
So many questions, and yet I have no answers. I would love to hear any feedback from you all. Thanks for reading!
PS. this is my first post and it's telling me to select an applicable tag but nothing is relevant. I'm going to select News but if that's not right, please forgive me!
I see you spelled it correctly and yes!! I have some old books and comics of The Berenstein Bears at my folks house. I’m gonna have to find them.
I would love to see those pics!
They'll say Berenstain. All my childhood books are "stain". I checked...
...after asking my mom if she remembers those bears I used to read about, how to spell it (she thought it was stein), and if we still have the books. Yep, in a box in the basement.
I'm 1,000,000% positive that the Berenstain Bears books were spelled that way. I remember it because I had a friend in school with "stein" in his last name and it bothered me for years that the books spelled it wrong.
That one is absolutely not a Mandela Effect.
And I remember wondering why "stein" sounded like "Steen" and not "Stine" (like Frankenstein or Einstein).
There seem to be people from both "universes/dimensions" present here. I've seen other people that are pretty sure about it.
Another one is people who swear up and down that it was Looney Toons, not Tunes.
Warner Brothers made several music themed cartoon shows.. Silly Symphonies, Merrie Melodies, and Looney Tunes... So it totally makes sense for it to be Tunes to me, and I think people who remember "Toons" are just mixing it up with Tiny Toons, or maybe "toons"/toontown from Roger Rabbit.
The old WB cartoons were essentially music videos in the beginning.
But... Assuming this craziness is real for a second, maybe I'm just not from a "Toons" dimension, and explaining all this to the people who are is meaningless because they have their own memories of why "toons" makes complete sense.
Can confirm this one. My wife has a whack of stuff from her childhood and has a bunch of those books. They say Berenstain.
We had those books when my kids were little. One remembers it as Berenstain, one remembers Berenstein, and one remembers Berenstein pronounced Berenstain. I have no idea.
I just checked as well. I bought my kids collection of books from Value Village and they're from the 80's. They're all Berenstain. Which is NOT CORRECT.
it's pretty wild to see.
This was a fun documenatry.
I’ll look next time I go.