Fuck our archaic, outdated system of British Common Law. Fuck our black-robed lesser noble tyrants called "judges." Burn the whole thing to the ground and rebuild under Constitutional law.
Ugh, this is just statistical manipulation. This guy's just presenting the absolute risk reduction. This is no different than presenting the raw number when the percents look bad or vice versa.
-"Oh look, we went from 10 police shootings of unarmed black men to 12 out of hundreds of millions of police interactions annually" 20% increase in cops shooting poor black men.
-"Oh look Greenland's calving off 400 million tons of icebergs b/c globull warming!" 1-2% of Greenland's glacial ice calves off every year, while overall glacial ice mass continues to rise year over year, just like in Antarctica.
This is just lying with statistics. The test showed that of 43,000 people, half injected with the vaccine, half with saline, 162 who got saline later tested positive for COVID while 8 in the Pfizer vax group tested positive --> 95% efficacy within the 2-3 month observation period, whatever that was. This is the gold standard for calculating vaccine efficacy. That's what the data show.
Unless this guy's going to start digging into the test methodology itself (and it's SIGNIFICANT flaws), this is a non-starter of a discussion and totally meaningless propaganda. Address the point that matters (Pfizer wasn't testing the primary endpoint in a huge number of their patients, meaning that 162/8 was totally contrived) or stop wasting time.
This is the clearest summary yet of what was actually observed. The eyes start glassing over from defining ARR vs RRR before getting to the real numbers so only "95%" is remembered.
Of course... they play these clever games in the industry to gain favor of the unwitting public. It IS criminal. That's why I was laughing when they claimed the vaccines were 100% effective in children. For a disease that has essentially 0% fatality in children, what the hell WOULDN'T be 100% effective? I can think of a few other things that would provide 100% efficacy:
Eating cheese-sticks
Drinking soda
Sitting cross-legged
Sleeping on your side
Circling a tree
Doing a forward roll
I mean What The Absolute F!?? People have lost their minds. It's just total madness.
Sorry? Effective at what? There is no virus! There is no disease. Please research before posting
Dr Kauffman virology brand-new tube
Dr Stefan Lanka website evidence court case German Supreme court. Step by step demo to showcno way there was an isolated of a measles virus.
Dr Robert Young California naturapath corresponded with the CDC re no evidence of an isolate for any virus
Foi request s UK Boris Johnson office pH England hold no evidence of isolate foi requests
The Bernician website deception of virology
David icke website
Dr David Martin website
Yes I know what you mean. If I didn't have to use a tablet and could touch type on my laptop it would help. Vif you can't see passed that..look at what I post and research.
It was ruled that TV news can lie. More people need to know that. The networks are controlled by paymasters who want you ignorant and in conflict with one another. https://lawblog.legalmatch.com/2015/02/13/can-the-news-legally-lie-to-the-public/
Thanks Obama.
"Ruled"
Fuck our archaic, outdated system of British Common Law. Fuck our black-robed lesser noble tyrants called "judges." Burn the whole thing to the ground and rebuild under Constitutional law.
It’s not just fake news, it is complicity in DS murder
Ugh, this is just statistical manipulation. This guy's just presenting the absolute risk reduction. This is no different than presenting the raw number when the percents look bad or vice versa.
-"Oh look, we went from 10 police shootings of unarmed black men to 12 out of hundreds of millions of police interactions annually" 20% increase in cops shooting poor black men.
-"Oh look Greenland's calving off 400 million tons of icebergs b/c globull warming!" 1-2% of Greenland's glacial ice calves off every year, while overall glacial ice mass continues to rise year over year, just like in Antarctica.
This is just lying with statistics. The test showed that of 43,000 people, half injected with the vaccine, half with saline, 162 who got saline later tested positive for COVID while 8 in the Pfizer vax group tested positive --> 95% efficacy within the 2-3 month observation period, whatever that was. This is the gold standard for calculating vaccine efficacy. That's what the data show.
Unless this guy's going to start digging into the test methodology itself (and it's SIGNIFICANT flaws), this is a non-starter of a discussion and totally meaningless propaganda. Address the point that matters (Pfizer wasn't testing the primary endpoint in a huge number of their patients, meaning that 162/8 was totally contrived) or stop wasting time.
This is the clearest summary yet of what was actually observed. The eyes start glassing over from defining ARR vs RRR before getting to the real numbers so only "95%" is remembered.
Statistics explanation win right here.
The difference what RRR is and what ARR is. Relative or absolute. Go on, check it out. I will wait.
Is that a difference in pronunciation for normal people and pirates?
Of course... they play these clever games in the industry to gain favor of the unwitting public. It IS criminal. That's why I was laughing when they claimed the vaccines were 100% effective in children. For a disease that has essentially 0% fatality in children, what the hell WOULDN'T be 100% effective? I can think of a few other things that would provide 100% efficacy:
Eating cheese-sticks Drinking soda Sitting cross-legged Sleeping on your side Circling a tree Doing a forward roll
I mean What The Absolute F!?? People have lost their minds. It's just total madness.
Anyone been stalking stock prices of rope companies?
Pitchforks might be worth checking out also.
The vax offers negative protection.
.84% at 100% risk... seems the herd will thin itself.
ARR is not RRR.
They measure different things. They are calculated differently.
RRR is the standard and has been for a very, long, long time. There's no bait and switch going on herr
Sorry? Effective at what? There is no virus! There is no disease. Please research before posting
Dr Kauffman virology brand-new tube Dr Stefan Lanka website evidence court case German Supreme court. Step by step demo to showcno way there was an isolated of a measles virus. Dr Robert Young California naturapath corresponded with the CDC re no evidence of an isolate for any virus Foi request s UK Boris Johnson office pH England hold no evidence of isolate foi requests The Bernician website deception of virology David icke website Dr David Martin website
You would be taken more seriously if you were able to form coherent sentences.
Yes I know what you mean. If I didn't have to use a tablet and could touch type on my laptop it would help. Vif you can't see passed that..look at what I post and research.