I would have expected the mainstream media to be all over that like Oprah on a glazed ham... but they seem more worried about us noticing such things.
Given the mathematical probability of firing into an average crowd of Americans and hitting three Jews is 1 in 1,250... it makes me wonder if (((George Soros))) is prioritizing recruiting Jewish Antifa members.
Q repeated says there are no coincidences, so I think it's wise to notice such things.
Her academic work focuses on death preparations, social competition, and gender studies.
The thing about SJWs is that they don't think that facts are important. To them, goodness, morality, and truth are all the same thing. They all are a measure of how well something fits into their SJW narrative.
This is not just words. They have been trained to not think. If you confronted the author on her lies/inaccuracy, she would never back down. To her, you are just a bad person nattering at her about something inconsequential.
To her, you are just attacking her by criticizing something that was obviously good and true. To her, you pointing out that it wasn't true is just more evidence that you are a Nazi and somebody needs to silence/terminate you.
Yeah, well National Geographic still supports the out of Africa theory.
So, according to them, we’re all black.
Kyle Rittenhouse shot three Jews.
I would have expected the mainstream media to be all over that like Oprah on a glazed ham... but they seem more worried about us noticing such things.
Given the mathematical probability of firing into an average crowd of Americans and hitting three Jews is 1 in 1,250... it makes me wonder if (((George Soros))) is prioritizing recruiting Jewish Antifa members.
Q repeated says there are no coincidences, so I think it's wise to notice such things.
Also, one was a communist, one was a wife beater and the other was a pedofile.
A communist, a wife beater and a pedophile walk into a riot...lol great setup for a joke
Kyle racks the slide, "What'll ya have fellas?"
National Geographic should post a very public retraction as should the author of that article.
This is just getting too far beyond the pale.
The thing about SJWs is that they don't think that facts are important. To them, goodness, morality, and truth are all the same thing. They all are a measure of how well something fits into their SJW narrative.
This is not just words. They have been trained to not think. If you confronted the author on her lies/inaccuracy, she would never back down. To her, you are just a bad person nattering at her about something inconsequential.
To her, you are just attacking her by criticizing something that was obviously good and true. To her, you pointing out that it wasn't true is just more evidence that you are a Nazi and somebody needs to silence/terminate you.