In laymens terms, mRNA comes from the nucleus of our cells, the same place DNA is housed. DNA is to big to exit the nucleus but mRNA is a single strand and can exit to be translated and transcribed by ribosomes which in turn produces copies of the proteins read. Please correct me if I’m wrong but I believe this is a simple explanation of how mRNA is used. My question is how can mRNA change your DNA code? mRNA is small enough to exit the nucleus but I am unaware if there is a function of it re-entering. So is it safer to say that mRNA may enable the production of an unnatural protein which then changes a particular function in our bodies instead of saying it changes our DNA? If that’s the case can term GMO still be applied to those who have been vaccinated? Lastly, other than viral load what is the difference between our immune systems reacting naturally with KungFlu and reacting to the vaccine? Obviously the vaccine is not the same as the virus as it has extra ingredients but I am speaking strictly genetically has is it different? Can any docs or scientists help me out with my understanding? Thank you in advance.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Meaning our social security number is really a property number
mRNA can't change a person's DNA. DNA to mRNA creation in the body is all one way. Parts of DNA are transcribed into mRNA, and those chunks of mRNA are translated into proteins using amino acids. It's all a one way downstream trip. There's no mechanisms for mRNA to "inject" itself into a person's DNA.
HIV is also a retrovirus though, so it can do that. Other retroviruses would be able to behave similarly. That's a rather distinct form of life and is more the exception than the rule for everything else out there.
Thank you so much. This is great info. I am running into the same yes/no answers on DNA change as well. The feedback loop that u/Tewdryg suggests could make it possible but I’m unsure as I’ve only learned about translation and transcription which takes place outside the nucleus where the DNA is.
mRNA can't change a person's DNA. DNA to mRNA creation in the body is all one way. Parts of DNA are transcribed into mRNA, and those chunks of mRNA are translated into proteins using amino acids. It's all a one way downstream trip. There's no mechanisms for mRNA to "inject" itself into a person's DNA.
Do not understand you. Do the vaxxed no longer have any of their pre-vax natural immune system left? So, if the mutated virus "blows by" the original vaccine, wouldn't the person's own immune system try to fight?
So everytime the person is booster due to a new variant, the immune system is thereby pre-weakened(provided the jab isn’t a from one of kill shot lots)
Listen to Dr. Zelenko's interview on X22..he explains much of this. It is horrifying to see so clearly what was been done. He ends with suggestions on how to deal with it.
I saw it. That’s where my question was generated from. The messing with DNA, God’s patented code for you if you will, is one of the bases of the exemption I’m drafting for work. It’s hard to sift through all the propaganda online though. I mean it’s easy to recognize an opinion over hard backed science, it’s just hard finding the explanation accompanying the opinion.
There's a feedback loop that expressly changes the DNA.
This technology is the same technology used in making GMO foods.
Thanks, I was about to post the same thing. This is what I told my wife why I refuse to take the Vaxx. Ether Scientific America, or Discover Mags have had articles about this very mRNA technology, and how it is used to make GMO Food (corn, wheat, cotton, Roundup Ready, etc...) and Animals.
Thank you for the response. Would you by chance know what this feedback loop process is called so I can look it up and research it’s function? Or, if possible, give a brief explanation?
I don't have the link right off hand and I recall three doctorate degree( Ph.D., MD, JD) individual explaining it in detail. He wasn't the only source though. Despite the 'Fact Check' lies saying otherwise, it most certainly does permanently changes the DNA. They know this too.
By the way I learned all this from Stephen Myers book, Signature in the Cell, that explains how DNA is akin to digital information in software coding. I highly recommend it. It will challenge your belief in evolution, if you ever had any to begin with, and affirm Intelligent Design.
The book worm in me loves book recommends, thanks for posting this.
Enjoy. He gets pretty technical and scientific but does a good job laying groundwork to help you understand.
The title is great and I agree.
The vaxxed are now Inhuman. Lmao.
If no longer human, then no salvation is possible? Jesus died for the human race. Frightening.
All for a donut.
Isn’t there a story about what god did when they nephilim bred with man? Something about being angry at the corrupt bloodline.
And Noah was blameless / perfect / unblemished / without defect in his generations. Genesis 6:9
Thank you for chiming in.
As you can probably tell, I haven’t really read the Bible.
Working on changing that.
You're in for a treat then! Genesis is awesome. Sometimes confusing. Sometimes I wish there was more explanation to the story. But Genesis really is foundational to life and to understand who God is.
The Nephilim stuff is in Gen 6.
That doesn’t sound right to me. We are speaking of a technicality of not being human more to emphasize the magnitude of what they are forcing on people. Still human just a GMO human? Not funny but I want to laugh at that. Now if you take the mark when it arrives that will be an entirely different issue and will condemn you to the lake of fire.
Good points. I think I was just thinking out loud but I see how the mark is much, much more and has those spiritual consequences.
if theyre not human anymore then do they have human rights?
I am not a lawyer, but it seems that if all the lot numbers and vials contain different contents, in otherwise variations, that the work originally submitted for the Covid shot EUA no longer holds because contents have been altered. This should make theBig Pharma companies liable because they are not providing full informed consent. Any thoughts, especially from anyone who may have looked into the government agreement with Big Pharma and in light of Congress providing immunity to liability in the case of vaccines? Especially since these shots don’t fulfill the definition of a true vaccine, and since the EUA the definition of a vaccine has been deliberately changed/altered, it would appear to me that liability is null and void.
As I understand it, you have a not-zero chance of having your DNA for SOME ceIIs get modified. The RNA strand persists in your body for an elongated amount of time but not indefinitely as I understand it, meaning to say if it stays where it's supposed to, only that area is affected.
PMC8299225. That being said, it comes from that article and I've admittedly not read it entirely just yet. Please do read up on it too.
Thank you, I’m checking it out too.
In other articles I’ve read they state that the mRNA dies off and doesn’t remain viable for long but that sounds subjective and suspect to me. In a natural occurring mRNA sure it happens every day. It’s why you don’t stay sick forever as processes cease protein production for particular needs but with a fully synthetic mRNA, who knows? The pharma company getting paid to make and sell it?