Maxwell has previously fought the unsealing of the legal names of the John Does revealed in the still-sealed court documents, but a letter from her lawyer dated January 12th notes that Maxwell “does not wish to further address” detailed objections submitted by Non-Party Does 17, 53, 54, 55, 73, 93, and 151. You can read the full letter below.
The fact that Maxwell is no longer interested in keeping the names sealed doesn’t mean, of course, that they will be revealed. That decision will be left to Judge Loretta Preska, who is presiding over the case. What it does likely indicate, however, is that now that Mawell is a convicted felon, she doesn’t really care about protecting the names anymore.
Have ta click on "continue reading"
Note 1: This is an MSM article? Woah. The goods are rising to the surface, no?
Note 2: Mis-spell of Maxwell's name. Come'on guys. Proofreading?
Thanks fren, exactly what I was looking for. I am not too used to MSM sites, so as a rule I dont click anything on those pages. Looks like "continue reading" is a benign button (surprise!) and doesnt take you to some subscription page as I expected, lol
Have ta click on "continue reading"
Note 1: This is an MSM article? Woah. The goods are rising to the surface, no?
Note 2: Mis-spell of Maxwell's name. Come'on guys. Proofreading?
https://c.tenor.com/LoZlpBdGi2AAAAAC/joe-biden-cmon-man.gif
Thanks fren, exactly what I was looking for. I am not too used to MSM sites, so as a rule I dont click anything on those pages. Looks like "continue reading" is a benign button (surprise!) and doesnt take you to some subscription page as I expected, lol
I'm just like you. I was expecting some sort of "pay to read more" or such, but gladly, it was just a button.
Now, I must say, that I found this particular story inspiring, so....
https://greatawakening.win/p/141Ero3SQJ/sing-to-the-tune-of-do-re-mi--ma/