Well considering most federal law is Unconstitutional and written in a way that people thought they had to follow it, but really it was just a suggestion this whole time.
It is very obvious we need a Convention of States to put more Amendments in that pretty much relegate the Fed to a maintenance government as was originally intended and leave particulars up to the states. Did you know Congress isn't actually supposed to be a full time job?
"Shall not be infringed, dumb ass" should be the new wording. That way if anyone argues it in court, those arguing against it can't get mad for being called a dumb ass.
This began in 1871 and was reinforced in 1913, ALL of USA Inc. is unconstitutional... And yes, congress should be peopled with honest folk who have jobs they go back to when their 2 terms are up..
Not too sure we would need a handful of amendments, more like we need to get rid of some. Some of them are useless, and some may be too broad, in that they cover multiple issues which would be all be best served as single amendments.
For example, the 14th amendment has 5 separate sections which would be best served as individual amendments. If we were to be able to do that, we would have a hell of a lot of amendments, but they would each be a single issue, and would necessarily be simple.
We should also have a separate, long amendment which tells congress how they are to operate. My big thing is no more voting present - either yes or no. Miss 3 votes without an excuse, and you are considered to have voluntarily left office and a special election held in your district.
Another stating that in order to join the union, every state must have recall provisions for all elected positions. Don't have that, can't join the union.
Maybe in that amendment that tells congress how to operate, all laws must first go to the supreme court to determine if it's constitutional or not. I'd also place more limitations on the privilege from arrest to be treason, sedition, espionage, sabotage, negligent homicide, and there's more that I can't think of right now.
Political corruption that can lead to treason/sedition/sabotage/espionage, yes. If you're just talking financial corruption like money laundering, embezzlement, etc, then no, that's not worthy of the death penalty.
Well considering most federal law is Unconstitutional and written in a way that people thought they had to follow it, but really it was just a suggestion this whole time.
It is very obvious we need a Convention of States to put more Amendments in that pretty much relegate the Fed to a maintenance government as was originally intended and leave particulars up to the states. Did you know Congress isn't actually supposed to be a full time job?
We can use strong verbiage in our updates. Things like “Shall not be infringed.”
"Shall not be infringed, dumb ass" should be the new wording. That way if anyone argues it in court, those arguing against it can't get mad for being called a dumb ass.
This began in 1871 and was reinforced in 1913, ALL of USA Inc. is unconstitutional... And yes, congress should be peopled with honest folk who have jobs they go back to when their 2 terms are up..
Not too sure we would need a handful of amendments, more like we need to get rid of some. Some of them are useless, and some may be too broad, in that they cover multiple issues which would be all be best served as single amendments.
For example, the 14th amendment has 5 separate sections which would be best served as individual amendments. If we were to be able to do that, we would have a hell of a lot of amendments, but they would each be a single issue, and would necessarily be simple.
We should also have a separate, long amendment which tells congress how they are to operate. My big thing is no more voting present - either yes or no. Miss 3 votes without an excuse, and you are considered to have voluntarily left office and a special election held in your district.
Another stating that in order to join the union, every state must have recall provisions for all elected positions. Don't have that, can't join the union.
Maybe in that amendment that tells congress how to operate, all laws must first go to the supreme court to determine if it's constitutional or not. I'd also place more limitations on the privilege from arrest to be treason, sedition, espionage, sabotage, negligent homicide, and there's more that I can't think of right now.
My biggest one is anti corruption laws that carry the noose followed quickly by maximum transparency.
Political corruption that can lead to treason/sedition/sabotage/espionage, yes. If you're just talking financial corruption like money laundering, embezzlement, etc, then no, that's not worthy of the death penalty.