Agreed that we have everything we need, but another reason Q wouldn't post now is because the Q team was a part of the Trump administration. The team left when Trump left. Even during a remote presidency under devolution, it's uncertain they have command of all the NSA tools necessary for full protection.
I don't agree with the downvote even though I don't agree with your point. Differing opinions are perfectly fine.
Devolution changes everything. I need to read more but I understand it's a scaled down or minimized form of government. It's like when you run Windows in safemode. You have less functionality but it's more stable.
When you are running Windows in safe mode, only protected system processes are running. It's not necessarily about being more stable, but rather allowing to isolate the broken or infected processes.
If we are likening our government to Windows safe mode and saying it's "more stable" then we are in an even worse place, since Windows is generally about as stable as a guy with Parkinson's on a raft.
Additionally, the key point is that those broken processes are removed from the lineup and prevented from starting on their own; We see that our government is still being run with tyranny in mind.
If Trump doesn’t habe the nsa tools as you suggested then that would only mean that he is not in control. Sorry, but it’s illogical to disagree wth that statement.
Agreed that we have everything we need, but another reason Q wouldn't post now is because the Q team was a part of the Trump administration. The team left when Trump left. Even during a remote presidency under devolution, it's uncertain they have command of all the NSA tools necessary for full protection.
that would mean that the “trump is the real president behind the scenes right now” theory is bunk
I don't agree with the downvote even though I don't agree with your point. Differing opinions are perfectly fine.
Devolution changes everything. I need to read more but I understand it's a scaled down or minimized form of government. It's like when you run Windows in safemode. You have less functionality but it's more stable.
Solid analogy.
I don't necessarily agree with your analogy.
When you are running Windows in safe mode, only protected system processes are running. It's not necessarily about being more stable, but rather allowing to isolate the broken or infected processes.
If we are likening our government to Windows safe mode and saying it's "more stable" then we are in an even worse place, since Windows is generally about as stable as a guy with Parkinson's on a raft.
Additionally, the key point is that those broken processes are removed from the lineup and prevented from starting on their own; We see that our government is still being run with tyranny in mind.
If Trump doesn’t habe the nsa tools as you suggested then that would only mean that he is not in control. Sorry, but it’s illogical to disagree wth that statement.