Let me address #3. I'll have to think about the other two, and I got something else coming up (Yikes, I have to go cold turkey on GAW!)
I've been reconsidering folks like Steve Kirsch, Robert Malone, Steven Hatfill, and Judy Mikovits (remember, "Be careful who you follow"). Their attacks on the vaxx have been extremely valuable. But the steadfast adherence to the church of virus is troubling. Of course 3 out of the 4 are virologists, so an uncritical attitude might be expected. At least initially, but not once the holes in virology are put to them.
They never say anything that discredits the notions of viruses or virology. Almost as if they have been pushed forward to placate the skeptics while keeping the extremely useful concept of a powerful yet invisible killer that can take on any desired traits very much real and alive (to the extent that a virus can be considered to be alive, that is). The DS can drop Covid as long as they are confident that the thought of a new scary virus is not ridiculous.
I only recently started thinking about limited hangout operations. That is, offering up some truths in order to withhold key and damaging facts, e.g., intriguing arguments against vaccines, so we forget to pursue more sinister aspects of the Covid drama. This was after reading Kirsch's ad hominem attacks on Dr.’s Kaufman, Lanka, and Cowan and claiming that the problem over "isolation" was a trivial semantic issue. As if the meaning of words is not important. It struck me as a very cheesy argument.
I have hopes for Malone. I've been watching him & Kirsch since I saw them on the Brett Weinstein Darkhorse podcast many months back. Malone impressed me, but he seemed naive. Kirsch was good too, but pretty obnoxious. Over the months Malone has evolved -- he is awaking to the evil now, but is still stuck on viruses. But think if we were told that Boolean logic was invalid. We would ignore and deny the possibility until the last possible moment.
Kirsch hasn't evolved at all. I can't figure out why he would be so vested in the virus theory to pretend that both sides have a legitimate claim to what isolation means, and turn to what I view as character assassination.
Boolean logic was invalid. We would ignore and deny the possibility until the last possible moment.
This is how it is. I have noticed that when it comes to redpilling, every person has hard resistance to be redpilled in the area of their expertise. People in medicaly profession refuse to believe doctors and nurses can be evil/stupid. People in journalism can never believe that media is a controlled operation. People in computers find it hard to believe Big Tech is evil, and so on.
Another way of looking at it - we see people taking about Biden's inflation, and how the economy is bad etc. But no one except really fringe guys mention how the whole economy is a ponzi scheme. It has the same similarity to the vaccine hoax vs virus/germ theory hoax.
It is really hard to believe something you spent your whole life mastering is a hoax.
Now, talking about instinct, something tells me that Malone is benign. Steve is just a business/entrepreneurial type who is very much plugged into the matrix, but I feel like he is benign as well. We will see, things will become clearer as time goes by. I am keeping my mind open.
Oh, as for limited hangout, once the vaccine story blows up into normies, good luck containing anything. If anything it will stop them from every trusting a doctor or a scientist!
Yeah, once normies are aware of the damage the vaxx has done they won't trust much of anything in the medical/pharma arena. The elite parasites pushed too many buttons for too long to keep that horse in the barn.
My instinct says to trust Malone on most things, Kirsch on a bit less. I think Kirsch attacks people because it's his personality, not to preserve the concept of the virus. The one person I don't trust at all is David Martin. He is connected to many organizations with globalist aims, is an expert in so many fields, and has so many accomplishments that he is just not believable as a real human being.
Excellent points - both you and u/bubble_bursts. It would seem the whole MIC house of cards might be on the brink of collapse.
As for Dr. Martin, he absolutely falls into the, "be careful who you follow" category. Even so, his delve into patents and their dates of issue is "interesting".
Let me address #3. I'll have to think about the other two, and I got something else coming up (Yikes, I have to go cold turkey on GAW!)
I've been reconsidering folks like Steve Kirsch, Robert Malone, Steven Hatfill, and Judy Mikovits (remember, "Be careful who you follow"). Their attacks on the vaxx have been extremely valuable. But the steadfast adherence to the church of virus is troubling. Of course 3 out of the 4 are virologists, so an uncritical attitude might be expected. At least initially, but not once the holes in virology are put to them.
They never say anything that discredits the notions of viruses or virology. Almost as if they have been pushed forward to placate the skeptics while keeping the extremely useful concept of a powerful yet invisible killer that can take on any desired traits very much real and alive (to the extent that a virus can be considered to be alive, that is). The DS can drop Covid as long as they are confident that the thought of a new scary virus is not ridiculous.
I only recently started thinking about limited hangout operations. That is, offering up some truths in order to withhold key and damaging facts, e.g., intriguing arguments against vaccines, so we forget to pursue more sinister aspects of the Covid drama. This was after reading Kirsch's ad hominem attacks on Dr.’s Kaufman, Lanka, and Cowan and claiming that the problem over "isolation" was a trivial semantic issue. As if the meaning of words is not important. It struck me as a very cheesy argument.
I have hopes for Malone. I've been watching him & Kirsch since I saw them on the Brett Weinstein Darkhorse podcast many months back. Malone impressed me, but he seemed naive. Kirsch was good too, but pretty obnoxious. Over the months Malone has evolved -- he is awaking to the evil now, but is still stuck on viruses. But think if we were told that Boolean logic was invalid. We would ignore and deny the possibility until the last possible moment.
Kirsch hasn't evolved at all. I can't figure out why he would be so vested in the virus theory to pretend that both sides have a legitimate claim to what isolation means, and turn to what I view as character assassination.
This is how it is. I have noticed that when it comes to redpilling, every person has hard resistance to be redpilled in the area of their expertise. People in medicaly profession refuse to believe doctors and nurses can be evil/stupid. People in journalism can never believe that media is a controlled operation. People in computers find it hard to believe Big Tech is evil, and so on.
Another way of looking at it - we see people taking about Biden's inflation, and how the economy is bad etc. But no one except really fringe guys mention how the whole economy is a ponzi scheme. It has the same similarity to the vaccine hoax vs virus/germ theory hoax.
It is really hard to believe something you spent your whole life mastering is a hoax.
Now, talking about instinct, something tells me that Malone is benign. Steve is just a business/entrepreneurial type who is very much plugged into the matrix, but I feel like he is benign as well. We will see, things will become clearer as time goes by. I am keeping my mind open.
Oh, as for limited hangout, once the vaccine story blows up into normies, good luck containing anything. If anything it will stop them from every trusting a doctor or a scientist!
Yeah, once normies are aware of the damage the vaxx has done they won't trust much of anything in the medical/pharma arena. The elite parasites pushed too many buttons for too long to keep that horse in the barn.
My instinct says to trust Malone on most things, Kirsch on a bit less. I think Kirsch attacks people because it's his personality, not to preserve the concept of the virus. The one person I don't trust at all is David Martin. He is connected to many organizations with globalist aims, is an expert in so many fields, and has so many accomplishments that he is just not believable as a real human being.
Excellent points - both you and u/bubble_bursts. It would seem the whole MIC house of cards might be on the brink of collapse.
As for Dr. Martin, he absolutely falls into the, "be careful who you follow" category. Even so, his delve into patents and their dates of issue is "interesting".
Interesting for sure.