Conditioning doesn't work on 100% of the people it is used against, yes. Some people retain the ability to think despite their training to do otherwise.
It probably works on you though, because it works on the majority.
Calling people "SCUM" for doing exactly what society trained them to do is, for example, a good sign that conditioning would work very well.
Completely agree: either really really dumb or completely complicit at their patients' expense; and in this case some of the patients have paid with their lives. But what this covid bs has shown me is that they do this as a matter of course. What other type of bs things have they done or gone along with? cancer? other deadly diseases? Ahell, the entire vaccine protocol?!?
And WTF are they doing with Remdesivir when we have HCQ, Zinc and Ivermectin that can actually help with basically ZERO risk. I suspect they are killing people to keep the Federal dollars coming in, and the government wants covid patients dead to keep the numbers for their waves of fear campaign. I think they get paid for each person they kill with Covid-19 on the death cert.
So you can understand why I'm so fucking pissed at them.
And this person comes here and tells me the doctors are innocent. No fucking way they are.
Medical School trains really high-level technicians with established protocols and medications approved for only certain conditions. The 'creative thinkers' are the private practice doctors and those in research (ie, not beholden to an overriding Group Practice manager (physician or otherwise) who is responsible for a bottom line to 'stakeholders').
What other type of bs things have they done or gone along with? cancer? other deadly diseases?
Lyme disease and other tick-borne illnesses. They find new ones each year.
The CDC has covered up the Lyme epidemic for decades.
Infectious disease doctors and neurologists routinely gaslight patients and tell them "Lyme is cured by 2 weeks of antibiotics" or "Lyme does not exist here."
The ELISA test for Lyme is inaccurate 50% of the time. You can test "negative" on it and still have Lyme.
Lyme suppresses the immune system, drills into bone and tissue, hides in biofilms and cyst form.
Lyme is everywhere, ticks are everywhere, they are carried by migrating birds. Does your city have mice, feral cats, coyotes, or raccoons? It has ticks.
I hear you. My question was partly rhetorical. I know they pull this bs in many other areas of medicine. We have a "health care" system that's policy- and protocol-driven rather than preventative and treatment. But policy-driven health care is much more lucrative for all except the patient.
Being smart has nothing to do with following orders/training and lack of critical thinking and you're either an unobservant idiot or completely inexperienced if you believe otherwise.
Oh please, it was simply a statement of fact. Calling a person with downs a retard is not an attack, for example.
In fact, I was being nice. Because if you think that critical thinking ability correlates to high IQ, you are one of those two things best case. Because there are worse reasons for not being able to understand reality, like being willfully ignorant or being a shill.
If you want, I can make the effort to make a full list of the possible things you are if you actually believe the being smart is the same thing as being able to think for yourself.
I have always struggled with the balance between protocols and critical thinking. If protocols are absolutely necessary, there needs to be a mechanism for dissent that is untouchable. The nursing code of ethics requires nurses to "go up the chain" as an advocate for patient care until what he or she believes is negligent or inappropriate care by other health professionals is addressed. As a practical matter this "code" is totally useless within any health organization, especially a hospital.
They need a Peter McCullough on call inspector general for this shit and total protection for whistleblower health professionals, even when it turns out they were wrong. And there needs to be a patient bill of rights that allows a patient to chose their care provider and to reject the protocol even in a hospital setting. FFS, if you have a "right to die" you should have a right to take Ivermectin.
Second random thought. I have two kids. Their hard wiring is totally different. One is a rule follower that thrives in an environment where there is a plan and order and defined steps to be taken. The other thrives in a seemingly less organized environment. There are plusses and minuses for each of them as they make their way through the world. God given talent is just that. But there is usually a corresponding weakness that is the flip side of the same coin. This is a long way of agreeing with you. Generally speaking, there is no utility or even justice in condemning people for being hard wired to think a certain way.
Conditioning doesn't work on 100% of the people it is used against, yes. Some people retain the ability to think despite their training to do otherwise.
It probably works on you though, because it works on the majority.
Calling people "SCUM" for doing exactly what society trained them to do is, for example, a good sign that conditioning would work very well.
They failed us for selfish reasons.
Medical Doctors are almost all very smart people, because you have to be to make it through.
They are not so dumb that they couldn't see what we could all see early on.
They are scum for letting so many people die rather than challenging the system.
At least some (but very few) did. They are not SCUM.
The rest are either dumb or SCUM take your pick.
Completely agree: either really really dumb or completely complicit at their patients' expense; and in this case some of the patients have paid with their lives. But what this covid bs has shown me is that they do this as a matter of course. What other type of bs things have they done or gone along with? cancer? other deadly diseases? Ahell, the entire vaccine protocol?!?
And WTF are they doing with Remdesivir when we have HCQ, Zinc and Ivermectin that can actually help with basically ZERO risk. I suspect they are killing people to keep the Federal dollars coming in, and the government wants covid patients dead to keep the numbers for their waves of fear campaign. I think they get paid for each person they kill with Covid-19 on the death cert.
So you can understand why I'm so fucking pissed at them.
And this person comes here and tells me the doctors are innocent. No fucking way they are.
They actually do get bonuses for using Remdesivir on their patients. All they need to qualify for the bonus is a positive test.
Medical School trains really high-level technicians with established protocols and medications approved for only certain conditions. The 'creative thinkers' are the private practice doctors and those in research (ie, not beholden to an overriding Group Practice manager (physician or otherwise) who is responsible for a bottom line to 'stakeholders').
EDIT - not an excuse
Lyme disease and other tick-borne illnesses. They find new ones each year.
The CDC has covered up the Lyme epidemic for decades.
Infectious disease doctors and neurologists routinely gaslight patients and tell them "Lyme is cured by 2 weeks of antibiotics" or "Lyme does not exist here."
The ELISA test for Lyme is inaccurate 50% of the time. You can test "negative" on it and still have Lyme.
Lyme suppresses the immune system, drills into bone and tissue, hides in biofilms and cyst form.
Lyme is everywhere, ticks are everywhere, they are carried by migrating birds. Does your city have mice, feral cats, coyotes, or raccoons? It has ticks.
I hear you. My question was partly rhetorical. I know they pull this bs in many other areas of medicine. We have a "health care" system that's policy- and protocol-driven rather than preventative and treatment. But policy-driven health care is much more lucrative for all except the patient.
I pick scum!
Being smart has nothing to do with following orders/training and lack of critical thinking and you're either an unobservant idiot or completely inexperienced if you believe otherwise.
And there it is.
The Ad Hominem personal attack on me instead of my argument.
Thanks for playing, fren.
Oh please, it was simply a statement of fact. Calling a person with downs a retard is not an attack, for example.
In fact, I was being nice. Because if you think that critical thinking ability correlates to high IQ, you are one of those two things best case. Because there are worse reasons for not being able to understand reality, like being willfully ignorant or being a shill.
If you want, I can make the effort to make a full list of the possible things you are if you actually believe the being smart is the same thing as being able to think for yourself.
I have always struggled with the balance between protocols and critical thinking. If protocols are absolutely necessary, there needs to be a mechanism for dissent that is untouchable. The nursing code of ethics requires nurses to "go up the chain" as an advocate for patient care until what he or she believes is negligent or inappropriate care by other health professionals is addressed. As a practical matter this "code" is totally useless within any health organization, especially a hospital.
They need a Peter McCullough on call inspector general for this shit and total protection for whistleblower health professionals, even when it turns out they were wrong. And there needs to be a patient bill of rights that allows a patient to chose their care provider and to reject the protocol even in a hospital setting. FFS, if you have a "right to die" you should have a right to take Ivermectin.
Second random thought. I have two kids. Their hard wiring is totally different. One is a rule follower that thrives in an environment where there is a plan and order and defined steps to be taken. The other thrives in a seemingly less organized environment. There are plusses and minuses for each of them as they make their way through the world. God given talent is just that. But there is usually a corresponding weakness that is the flip side of the same coin. This is a long way of agreeing with you. Generally speaking, there is no utility or even justice in condemning people for being hard wired to think a certain way.