DEVOLUTION KICKOFF DAY MAGATHREAD- MILITARY PEPEs and all others, comment what you can safely share based on what you observe.
🗣️ DISCUSSION 💬
I haven't even read devolution but hubby has- I hope today really is the day. Kick off is at noon! Update: OR, tomorrow because Devolution says 1 year and 1 day....... so 24 hour maga thread!
Devolution has nothing to do with the 1 year occupation DoD Law of War manual. Devolution author Patel Patriot has said multiple times he has read the manual multiple times and he doesn't see it in play.
Edit: here's what Patel says about Law of War. It's from last night. Skip to 12mins or so
https://rumble.com/vsyhvd-patel-patriot-devolution-power-hour-11922.html
Also, this is HIS opinion not mine. I see Q, Devolution and Law of War all working in concert.
Yessir! Promises made. Promises kept!
You sure? : https://patelpatriot.substack.com/
Skip to about 12mins in. He's very clear about his Law of War stance. This is from last night.
https://rumble.com/vsyhvd-patel-patriot-devolution-power-hour-11922.html
Thanks for this. I pulled it up. His intro video of Trump is excellent, then I skipped to minute 12. Seems like he is definitely unwilling to commit to datefagging and is skeptical about the Law of War manual being in play... I think everybody is skeptical of everything at this point, but I'm finally willing to be hopeful about what happens from here. Seems like of all dates, this pivotal one that is in the Law of War manual would be THEE date.
Exactly! Absorb it all, process it and keep the info that makes sense to you to build the bigger picture.
With what I understand, I'm treating the 1 year marker as more of a green light to move from defense to offense. Offense doesn't have to be a giant sweep on the one year marker. It can happen now at any time. When and how is unknown but the rollout can take place by following the rules set by the LoW.
Yes. He said it again last night on his power hour show. He loves to research, discuss and decide. He has no qualms talking about it so he's talking to IE17 later today but he still says he doesn't see it applied to his Devolution research. He is very open minded and maybe today's discussion will change his current opinion.
Is this the same guy that says he has never bothered with Q??
Be careful who you follow. Q
He has a weekly show with 2 Q followers he does every week called The Lions Den.
He purposely doesn't research Q so his Devolution digging isn't influenced by a bias to prove or disprove Q.
He listens to others and does engage in conversation when questioned or challenged.
Careful what you assume and open yourself to more than just Q.