Here are links to the Geneva Convention Articles.
GC: https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/publications/icrc-002-0173.pdf
I have seen people asking about the one year rule for the GC Articles. They seem to have reservations about it. Some people think it shouldn't apply in our situation, but these rules govern all conflict regardless of the situation or location. They are designed to protect humanity. They are international laws and the US did sign on to them.
If you look at page 153 of the GC link (Article 6), it says GC rules apply to both parties if involved in armed conflict until the close of military operations.
The next paragraph:
In the case of occupation (which is where it applies to us) "In the case of occupied territory, the application of the present Convention shall cease one year after the general close of military operations; however, the Occupying Power shall be bound, for the duration of the occupation.
Well, there never was any armed conflict, we were occupied (Biden as a foreign delegate of China). The clock started when Biden signed the EO's one year ago changing the rules of our country. Had patriots resisted and picked up arms against the Biden regime, the GC rules would continue to apply until one year after the close of military operations. So, it was good we didn't try to defend our nation via armed conflict. Q used the board to give us data, explain the takedown of the deepstate and encouraged us to stay peaceful bringing a close to GC rules for our occupied territory asap. (Jan 20th, 2022)
The one year rule was designed to protect human life and give time for conciliatory efforts and reach mutual agreements between the belligerent occupiers and occupied territory. If the occupied territory agrees to the occupying forces demands, all is good. In many instances the occupied territory is resistant to foreign invasions even if it is in their best interest. For example, the US can enter into war and occupy a foreign land for the purpose of overthrowing a dictator. The occupied territory may see us as a threat at first but when they see their living conditions improve after the fall of their dictatorial leader, concessions can be worked out within that one year window. Since living conditions improved, they are not living under tyranny any longer, the occupied territory would be inclined to accept the occupiers new laws. So this is why GC sets the one year timeline.
In the case for Biden, his approval ratings are plummeting, the occupied territory is not buying his bullshit and there will never be any concessions. This could be why Bidens approval rating are being discussed on a daily basis in the media. The people see this, they realize Biden will never win over the hearts and minds of the people and this gives the military (national guard) the right to step in and stop the grave breaches of GC committed by Biden.
In one of my last posts we covered what constituted grave breaches to the Geneva Convention Articles. (Page 52 Article 50 of the GC link)
• torture or inhuman treatment, including biological experiments;
• willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health;
• unlawful deportation or transfer or unlawful confinement of a protected person;
• willfully depriving a protected person of the rights of fair and regular trial prescribed in the GC
• taking of hostages
We can all agree that the Biden regime is guilty of all of these. There may have been a couple thresholds to cross, the GC one year timeline and a disapproval rating. What is the rating they are looking for? I don't know but some suggest it might be a 80% disapproval and this is speculatory. Our military may not be waiting for a specific number but wanted to get it as low as possible when we crossed the Jan 20th timeline. Making his disapproval rating known to the general public may limit any civil disobedience when Biden is removed. It also may be why so many polls are being conducted.
Biden is guilty of war crimes, based on the DOD Law of War Manual, Biden is considered a domestic terrorist by definition. This is why he has been calling us domestic terrorists, they like to use projection and blame you for the crimes they are guilty of.
I will get into more detail about the domestic terrorism claims in my next post. There are several avenues we could use to get rid of Biden, for example, using a international tribunal for his GC beaches is one. I think this option is for countries without a worthy military. I think we will do it ourselves. If Trump signed the Insurrection Act active military could be deployed on to our streets to stop the occupation. If he didn't sign it, using national guard and US Special ops might be the answer. Remember when Chris Miller placed special ops under civilian command? Given the reluctance of our DOD to cooperate with the Biden admin, this civilian authority may still stand, I'm still digging into that.
I'm going to end it here.
Stay safe my frens!!
God Bless you all!!
WWG1WGA!!!
Yet, he isn't asking for a discussion.....
Simply being contradictory, isn't the same as asking for clarification, or discernment...
Claiming there are "HOLES", where there are none, is the same as being a fact checker on FB claiming ""Missing context"".....
Those who have access to this site have access to ALL the same links and info as the rest of us who do comprehend, and have discernment....
The OP is only responsible for what he writes, not for what anyone else understands, misunderstands, or simply refuses to understand.....
The down votes are merited and valid.....
He's literally asking questions. You could answer them.
Why does anyone have to explain that "Armed Conflict" can take many forms, even Cyber War, which we are currently in, along with a Biological War, and does not specifically mean Kinetic War......
As for the rest of it, he too, just like the rest of us, can open the links provided, and read them the way we do, and get some better understanding.....
Interesting take.
No one does. Did you read anything of mine that says or implies that it cannot?
I'm asking why the OP directly contradicts himself; "There was no armed conflict" and "GC rules applies to both parties if involved in armed conflict"
Either this is armed conflict, or there isn't. It cannot be both. Whether you define armed conflict as "kinetic warfare", shooting with bows and arrows", "cyber attack via malicious code", "hacking and disrupting systems" makes no difference. Either there was, or there wasn't.
FYI, I've been doing all the reading, going through the documents. Reflect on the fact that you assume I have not. What does that say about your preconceptions?
So far, not ONE person has answered the question: "What exactly IN the Geneva Convention do the White Hats risk violating if they act against the Biden regime before the period of one year of application of the GC lapses? Can you point to the specific articles?"
I'm asking that question because no one is answering it. So far the OP has declined to address any of the questions I've posted on his last 3 posts on the topic.
Moreover, persons like yourself seem to resort to a) assuming I'm not reading the material or researching for myself (which is a baseless assumption) b) refusing to actual respond to concrete questions and c) attempting to shame me or down vote, as if its wrong to even question the theory.
Sadly, that's behavior that belongs in the Covid cult squad, not on a Q board whose very title is the Great Awakening.
Q4602
All the stuff about armed Conflict, isn't only about that, We are Occupied, without Kinetically Armed conflict, but Occupied none the less, and that is the second qualifier....
These preconceptions, the ones about not doing the research etc., they are just for you, they are for everyone who reads the comments, because many of us have been doing this research for years and others for decades....
WE, who have been in this mess for longer than a decade, Waco Texas, just in case you were wondering, have had to deal with many, many, many, people who want every bit of knowledge and info, laid out in front of them, and then they want it to be spoon fed to them.....
So it jades us a bit, and this is the exact attitude that pops up with people that sometimes might not know, that there is a lot of ""BASE Source"", and they're simply beginning like somewhere near the middle of the Movie/Book.....
There should Probably be a Single Thread, Stickied with all the Sources needed to bring people up to speed and on Points of view that help understand what has happened, or at least some sources such as those links I passed to you....
Sincerely, no insult intended.....