Saw this on 4chan -sorry if someone already posted - super relevant for this board
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (115)
sorted by:
Exactly. Might as well blame the beer brewer in your neighborhood as well.
The real problem is men and women buying into the feminist agenda; strong independent women don’t need men and weak men follow women. The foundation of families are thrown upside down and it’s rare any modern marriages last more than a decade or 2. Porn has fuck all to do with it. Women have forgotten how to be feminine and men have forgotten how to be masculine. Will it ever correct? Who knows? If shit gets bad enough it might.
It's a symptom and we all know those are easier to target than the actual root causes.
Yep, it’s a symptom. Exactly. Porn is the response of men (and many women) not getting what they need from their spouse. Porn came about as an answer to a missing piece, and feminism was what caused that piece to go missing
geez, can't one have a very happy and healthy marriage with kids and just have a frequent urge that is assisted by a video? my wife loves me and having sex with me but she can't jump to everytime I'm worked up. once upon a time i had to remember the hot girl a saw walking around the mall, or watch Gilligan's Island or snag the Frederick's catalog. was all this evil too? without a strong libido we are much less likely to reproduce. there's a reason we're not all priests and nuns
I agree with you to a degree. A big part of this is also learning and exploration. As a Christian, I know the church has done more harm than good in promoting a strong and healthy sex life within a marriage. Couples have to learn and experiment, and there is some big value in essentially having someone “teach” you new things, which porn can do. How else can you learn from watching what others are doing? Go to a live sex show?? Lol
Self control. Self discipline.
You're such a horny fucker you can't wait? You're so animalistic that you cannot contain yourself? You cannot wait? You cannot have restraint? You just have to HAVE TO cum?
I write this as a divorcee having fallen for the trap.
Porn existed before feminism. There was plenty of 19th century snuff literature for the fellas. And brothels have been in existence since forever. Besides if feminism were the real issue then why do so many men in traditional churches with submissive wives who put out still looking at porn? Reality is they don’t love their wives and are cheaters at heart. Ditto with women looking at porn.
Nahhh there has never been an abundance of pornography in all of history like what we have now. It has increased with the decline of society, but porn is not the problem. Neither is the “cheating men” who don’t “love their wives” lol.
Sorry having grown up in complemenarian churches where women submit and men lead, I can tell you this isn’t the solution to fixing marriages. It’s love. People have to live one another just like Jesus said. Without love the marriage you describe will be nothing but tyranny. Radical feminism simply reverses who gets to be the tyrant.
On that note, It never ceases to amaze me the people screaming 1776 whenever the government does something they don’t like, but those same people have a problem when a wife resists her tyrant husband and dares to expect love from him instead of a man-child barking overbearing orders and being irresponsible with money etc. Those wives are labeled a rebellious Jezebels. Very hypocritical if you ask me.
Ok. Let’s discuss. In generalities, of course. There will always be outliers.
God, Man, Woman, Child. That is the natural order. In my experience, any deviation from this ends in misery. Although, as you pointed out, mate selection is critical in choosing a partner capable of love.
Now, you what you’ve described as men aren’t men, they’re pussies. Or to put it more succinctly, they are men trying to play as women. Is that a dig at women? No. In the natural order, women are most secure, most happy, and most fulfilled when the male is the head of his family. So what does that mean? It means he puts God first and his wife and children above himself. He is the provider. This is part of what’s known as “the burden of male performance”. It’s the male who will sacrifice himself without a thought to protect his family. Not the other way around. Again, is that a dig at women? Not at all. A woman will do whatever she needs to do in order to protect her children, including killing if need be. But I digress, the point being whenever a man attempts to pass the burden of male performance onto his woman, pain and suffering will soon follow.
The tyrannical man in your example is simply an abusive asshole. Most likely due to never learning the natural order or how to truly care for a wife.
I agree with you. I just wanted to make sure love was in the equation. I see so many MRAs out there who want to play king of the castle but don’t realize that in Jesus’s kingdom the husband’s crown is a crown of thorns.
Well said! It’s a crown of thorns. Exactly. And any married man worth his salt will wear a crown of thorns with a smile on his face and joy in his heart knowing his wife and children are provided for. A woman can wear the crown if she chooses, but I’ve yet to meet one that finds any long-term joy in doing so. Raising children? Totally different story. In fact, I imagine an argument could potentially be made that motherhood is where the woman wears her own crown of thorns.