This case is not about the 2020 election and this is explicitly stated in the judge's opinion.
McLinko filed his petition in July of 2021, between elections, and sought expedited relief **“in sufficient advance” **of the November 2021 General Election so that electors would not have their votes disqualified. Application for Expedited Briefing and Summary Relief, ¶6.33
There is no risk of disenfranchisement of one vote, let alone millions, as was the case in Kelly. The critical difference between Kelly and this case is that McLinko is seeking prospective relief, i.e., a determination as to the constitutionality of Act 77 **for FUTURE elections. **
This case is not about the 2020 election and this is explicitly stated in the judge's opinion.
https://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Commonwealth/out/244MD21_1-28-22.pdf?cb=1
There was a case back in 2020 trying to throw out 2020 mail in ballots and The Supreme Court in PA, already dismissed it.
Regardless, fraud vitiates everything!
https://roserambles.org/2021/09/27/fraud-vitiates-everything-its-time-to-investigate-the-cheating-and-bring-criminal-charges-sept-26-2021-posted-sept-27-2021/
Double speak bullshit legalese. FictionL language I don't bother with. It's too easily defeated by thinking people.