If ballots that were issued for the 2020 election were not constituationally valid, then they were never valid ballots That means they are not supposed to have been counted in the election.
That would change the vote totals, and could lead to decertification of the wrong Electors for 2020.
The PA legislature would have to do it, though, which has not happened (yet).
This case is not about the 2020 election and this is explicitly stated in the judge's opinion.
McLinko filed his petition in July of 2021, between elections, and sought expedited relief **“in sufficient advance” **of the November 2021 General Election so that electors would not have their votes disqualified. Application for Expedited Briefing and Summary Relief, ¶6.33
There is no risk of disenfranchisement of one vote, let alone millions, as was the case in Kelly. The critical difference between Kelly and this case is that McLinko is seeking prospective relief, i.e., a determination as to the constitutionality of Act 77 **for FUTURE elections. **
This is correct that is explicitly mentioned in the judges ruling because the case involving the 2020 ballots was already settled before the election was certified.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has dismissed the lawsuit from Congressman Mike Kelly and congressional candidate Sean Parnell to declare universal mail-in voting unconstitutional in the state and deny the votes of the majority of Pennsylvanians who voted by mail in the Nov. 3 election.
One of the reasons it was thrown out was, they didn't object to the law when it was passed, the only objected once the counting was done. This would have disenfranchised 2.5 million votes.
McLinko filed his petition in July of 2021, between elections, and sought expedited relief “in sufficient advance” of the November 2021 General Election so that electors would not have their votes disqualified. Application for Expedited Briefing and Summary Relief, ¶6.33
There is no risk of disenfranchisement of one vote, let alone millions, as was the case in Kelly. The critical difference between Kelly and this case is that McLinko is seeking prospective relief, i.e., a determination as to the constitutionality of Act 77 for future elections.
Refusal to believe things will get better and lack of faith are NOT of God. Was not calling you the person Satan. I was calling out the spirit of negativity.
Is this possibly The first step to decertify?
use your deductive reasoning son
No. It has no effect on the 2020 elections
Nonsense.
If ballots that were issued for the 2020 election were not constituationally valid, then they were never valid ballots That means they are not supposed to have been counted in the election.
That would change the vote totals, and could lead to decertification of the wrong Electors for 2020.
The PA legislature would have to do it, though, which has not happened (yet).
We will see.
This case is not about the 2020 election and this is explicitly stated in the judge's opinion.
https://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Commonwealth/out/244MD21_1-28-22.pdf?cb=1
There was a case back in 2020 trying to throw out 2020 mail in ballots and The Supreme Court in PA, already dismissed it.
Regardless, fraud vitiates everything!
https://roserambles.org/2021/09/27/fraud-vitiates-everything-its-time-to-investigate-the-cheating-and-bring-criminal-charges-sept-26-2021-posted-sept-27-2021/
Double speak bullshit legalese. FictionL language I don't bother with. It's too easily defeated by thinking people.
But the articles say the ruling only affects future elections.
This is correct that is explicitly mentioned in the judges ruling because the case involving the 2020 ballots was already settled before the election was certified.
If it doesn't then we didn't follow the law to fix this. After all the screaming about following g the law Nd staying peaceful.
Undo the lie so.the idiots who think Biden got elected can eat their shit sandwich.
That’s a load of BS!! Silence!! Get behind me Satan!! In Jesus Almighty name
Are you calling me Satan for point out a fact? How dare you! Where do you get off? This is outrageous.
For everyone else, I'm not offering an opinion. I'm telling you a fact. This does not apply to the 2020 election.
That case was trying to have 2020 mail in ballots thrown out. This was back in Nov 2020 The PA Supreme unamiously denied with prejudice their case
One of the reasons it was thrown out was, they didn't object to the law when it was passed, the only objected once the counting was done. This would have disenfranchised 2.5 million votes.
This new lawsuit IS NOT ABOUT 2020. It was about future elections. It was filed back in july. Read the judge's ruling for yourself.
2 Timothy 1:7 For God has not given us a spirit of fear, but of power and of love and of a sound mind.
Genesis 50:20 You intended to harm me, but God intended it for good to accomplish what is now being done, the saving of many lives.
Refusal to believe things will get better and lack of faith are NOT of God. Was not calling you the person Satan. I was calling out the spirit of negativity.