Scott Adam is a grifter. I knew he was a shill once he started trying to debunk Q.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (144)
sorted by:
I read Scott Adams newest book a year ago or so and he tries so hard so 'debunk' Q. It was strange how he tried to pigeonhole it in and his 'debunking' didn't make much sense. It was basically him just calling it all a conspiracy theory. Of course since then he's only lost the plot even more, trying to outsmart everybody on the Covid 'science' and trying to remain the smartest person on Twitter.
He fell for the Covington Hoax and I’m pretty sure he fell for the Jussie Smollett Hoax.
He's gonna wake up one day and realize all his big issues that were sticking points with him, he was completely wrong on.
Talk about a poor example of a thinking human... And it's all in the public domain for all to see and learn from. Great example of how arrogance/pride can prohibit rational thought.
If this faggot is the definition of anything "intelligent" I'll make sure to stay clear away from whatever it is.
What book is that? I know he released one that was a best seller, didn't hear about his new one.
The problem with Best Sellers is, it doesn't take much to be a best seller, because not that many people read anymore. This was a comment from a publisher. ( And no, I don't have the source)
The failing NY Times bestseller list isn’t based on sales. It’s a list compiled by the editors of the newspaper based on what they consider the most relevant books at the moment. If they don’t agree with the actual top-selling book, they scratch it from the list. If they want to promote a book that didn’t sell well, they add it to the list. They don’t even hide this either.
Can't remember the title off the top of my head. It's his newest book.
Edit - looked it up, it's Loserthink.
I got it off torrents and remember nothing of it.
Haha, I didn't buy it either, I got it by other means. Same here, I can't say I remember much about it.
I don't remember much about Q in that book, but I could be wrong. Either way, it was nowhere near as good as Win bigly.
That sums up his M.O. quite nicely!