To all of the people who scream that Trump should have come out and told the world that vaccines were harmful before they were rolled out...
(media.greatawakening.win)
π RED PILL π
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (88)
sorted by:
Yeah but as a public figure just being silent only works if nobody asks the question. Obviously he is getting asked the question about the injection. Right now his answer is basically the status quo, which takes Trump out of the equation and allows those with TDS to also refuse the injection. It also prevents the corporate media from making the injections a left-right issue. They are still trying to do that, but itβs not working. Then there is the possibility that discrediting the injection puts us back into the position Trump was trying to avoid, of a 10 year lockdown while a vaccine is developed. For the covidphobes who need injections, they have injections, which makes it harder to justify lockdowns.
Check out clif highs take on this
again, he cant give the other side more ammo to paint him as anti vaxxer. His own base are critical thinkers and read between the lines.
If you get jabbed up because Trump says to then you're just another brainwashed sheep who cant think for yourself and deserve what you get.
I'm not going to try and convince you it had to be this way, Q told us all that. You have no idea how many more people would have died in any other scenario, none of us do.
The vaccines have saved millions.
More specifically, the early release of the vaccines have saved millions.
The world would have been a much darker place if the bad guys were in control of both the vax timeline and the White House.
We would have all been locked down for years before they released the vax.
The magnitude of suffering would have been immense.
Does that mean that the last two years have been fun? Of course not!
War is ugly. There are unavoidable losses.
Just let your mind run wild for a few minutes as to what could have happened without the fast rollout.
I agree when you say 'death is death'. And therefore, for any individual that dies due to the vax, the scenario 'cannot be any worse'. (Unless they have loved ones that are spared in this scenario.)
But, what if our current timeline (the fast-tracked vax) 'only' kills one million, but the 'full evil plan' would have killed 500 million? Would you consider that a 'net good'?
(Note: The bad guys are on record as wanting billions dead.)
I'm not going to argue that it's 'good overall', because it's not. But the evil guys had progressed so far with their plan that the 'fast-track' detour is the best we could hope for -- despite a lot of people dying.
If you can spell out a better plan, I'm all ears. But make it realistic.