I'm still not sure how they are getting away with mandating it anywhere. These experimental medical products are authorized for emergency use only. One of the conditions of the authorization is that the products require informed consent. The word consent implies that anyone can accept or reject the product without consequence. Anyone who attempts to mandate these products is violating the terms that have been used to authorize the products. That should be enough to win a lawsuit right there.
The FDA did grant a license to Pfizer under the brand name Comirnaty, but Comirnaty is not available in the United States. The only Pfizer product available in the US continues to be the emergency use authorized version of the product. The FDA and Pfizer have been misleading Americans for months that that Pfizer product is FDA approved.
They are not legal. The people just need to fight. Soon everyone will be fighting the commies and it will be clear that Brandon didn't get 21 million votes. The terms of the emergency use are set.
This is what I thought. But then u/PatriotWillWin453 said to me:
You're just repeating fake news that go around on the internet.
Comirnaty is the brand name of the Pfizer vax, which can now be sold under a brand name because it has the full approval. It's the same exact vaccine as before. Nothing changed in its composition.
And the legal liability is the same. The legal liability protection does not depend on the type of FDA approval. It depends on the PREP act.
If the vial doesn't say Comirnaty on it, it isn't Comirnaty. There are no vials of Comirnaty available in the United States. Here's the CDC link proving that Comirnaty is not available in the USA:
Whether the manufacturer would have more liability for the Comirnaty versus the EUA version remains to be seen in a court of law, but the paperwork submitted to gain approval includes language describing the Comirnaty product as "legally distinct".
Here are some articles from Children's Health Defense which explore the topic. Their founder is Robert Kennedy Jr so I would have to believe they have a pretty good grasp on the subject.
I'm still not sure how they are getting away with mandating it anywhere. These experimental medical products are authorized for emergency use only. One of the conditions of the authorization is that the products require informed consent. The word consent implies that anyone can accept or reject the product without consequence. Anyone who attempts to mandate these products is violating the terms that have been used to authorize the products. That should be enough to win a lawsuit right there.
The FDA did grant a license to Pfizer under the brand name Comirnaty, but Comirnaty is not available in the United States. The only Pfizer product available in the US continues to be the emergency use authorized version of the product. The FDA and Pfizer have been misleading Americans for months that that Pfizer product is FDA approved.
My thought too. The supreme court struck down the OSHA mandate so how can city mandates also be legal?
They are not legal. The people just need to fight. Soon everyone will be fighting the commies and it will be clear that Brandon didn't get 21 million votes. The terms of the emergency use are set.
This is what I thought. But then u/PatriotWillWin453 said to me: You're just repeating fake news that go around on the internet. Comirnaty is the brand name of the Pfizer vax, which can now be sold under a brand name because it has the full approval. It's the same exact vaccine as before. Nothing changed in its composition. And the legal liability is the same. The legal liability protection does not depend on the type of FDA approval. It depends on the PREP act.
So which is it?
If the vial doesn't say Comirnaty on it, it isn't Comirnaty. There are no vials of Comirnaty available in the United States. Here's the CDC link proving that Comirnaty is not available in the USA:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/programs/iis/COVID-19-related-codes.html#codes
Whether the manufacturer would have more liability for the Comirnaty versus the EUA version remains to be seen in a court of law, but the paperwork submitted to gain approval includes language describing the Comirnaty product as "legally distinct".
Here are some articles from Children's Health Defense which explore the topic. Their founder is Robert Kennedy Jr so I would have to believe they have a pretty good grasp on the subject.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/?s=comirnaty
Thanks. This all falls in line with what I thought until someone made me question it.
Beautiful succinct comment with source. You love to see it.