Propping up the "jewish central bank" as a scarecrow is just being anti-capitalist with extra unneeded redundant steps. Call it what it is: those countries just didn't want to bow to the same elite capitalist masters.
They are not capitalists - they are totalitarian New World Order Zionists. They aren't scarecrows, they are Jewish central bankers (see Q post #135 - #138). That is EXACTLY what they are: no need for scapegoats or euphemisms.
I find it amusing that you think capitalism and totalitarianism are mutually exclusive, when they are not -- and indeed together can create quite a startling power if done correctly.
Capitalism and Totalitarianism ARE mutually exclusive, it has been the leftists brainwashing propaganda to redefine what Capitalism is, and to Blame it on the worlds problems
Capitalism is not a planned system, It cannot actually exist without liberties and freedom, anything under a Totalitarian system is not Capitalism, China is NOT a capitalist country.
what these Cabal assholes are trying to create is basically a modern Feudal system, of "lords" and Serfs".
"Capitalism" is a marxist construct. It's a sad reflection of how much Marxism went to infect the world and even Western mainstream thinking such that people think "capitalism" means something it doesn't.
Capitalism means the concentration of all the capital in an elite group. This is what Marx's was ranting against. (Sound familiar? What is the Schwab cohort and their master's but "capitalism"?)
Before Marx, there was no such thing as "capitalism". If Marxism had never arrived or infiltrated in the way it did, what would we call what we want and what is the NATURAL system of economic and financial operation?
Free-Marketism. Free-markets, where everyone is free to trade, without govt intervention or the monopoly of oligarchs and "capitalists". (Oligarchs dictate control over the market via unfair means, including control of govts)
Personally, I think the distinction is really, really important, and not just because I abhor how massively the lies of Marxism have infiltrated even the minds of thinking people.
"Capitalist" accentuates, perpetuates and highlights the view that money is somehow inherently valuable, somehow something to be desired and sought after in and of itself. It's that mindset that props up Wall Street and the very corrupt materialistic 'western' corruption.
Free Market economics accentuates and emphasizes the view that freedom is inherently valuable, that freedom in all things, including economic activity, allows greater development, prosperity and MORE freedom.
In my opinion, that is...
Reject "Capitalism", embrace Free Market Economics. It's what most people mean when they say Capitalism, but their erroneous use of the term keeps alive the Marxist lie of Communism vs Capitalism. Illusion of choice. Without "Capitalism", Marxism is dead in the water.
I mean, are we WILLING for them to call us "antivaxxers"? Or do we want to recognize that most of us are in fact simply "Pro-choice" or even "anti-mandate"?
This is HOW Marxism and the devil's lies work. They create labels, and get people to embrace them. Labels that THEY (Marxism, and the Devil) define.
That's the only reason America and the Western world adopted this expression "Capitalism". They let Communism define the playing field. Today, we see how very dangerous that sort of capitulation of the field is.
Hitler was protecting his people from the freemasons, bankers, media and others. It just so happened that the overwhelming majority of these types were Jews, just like how it is now in America. Actually, even back then he called out America for our whole media being owned and run by Jewish people.
When I think about his quote about "the small international clique that sets the people of the world against each other and does not want them to have peace" the first thing that comes to mind is freemasons. He was right on about about the media being a major tool in accomplishing these things.
I can't say for sure (I have more reading/audiobooking to do) but maybe his hatred of Jewish people was more just a hatred for the bankers taking advantage of people, freemasons and everything they do, the corrupt media, the brainwashing arts (he hated that plays in Germany would often promote perversion), etc. Because as I said, and as we all know, those were all run by Jewish people, just like in America now. 2% of the German population and yet they seemed to be the only ones not starving from the super inflation caused by unfair WWI reparations and Jewish banksters in America crashing the stock market and calling on debt.
That he fought back against these people, when they are used to world leaders bending the knee, is why he has been lied about in the history books and in all types of media ever since. He closed all the freemason lodges in Germany. Once the Wehrmacht was forced into a world war and starting running through everyone's shit, they even allowed the citizens of the countries they took over to explore the lodges there as an exhibit to show them what they'd been allowing. So, if you take all of that and also believe the studies/tests from people from a couple different countries that claim zyklon-b was never in the camp showers...then Hitler seems like a fucking legendary hero.
If America wasn't owned by satanic bankers, we would have either remained neutral or joined the Axis Powers, or at least aided Germany in the European theater. Hitler had great respect for the people of America and Britain, until of course Britain and France ignored all of his olive branches and forced another world war, which America later joined.
Propping up the "jewish central bank" as a scarecrow is just being anti-capitalist with extra unneeded redundant steps. Call it what it is: those countries just didn't want to bow to the same elite capitalist masters.
They are not capitalists - they are totalitarian New World Order Zionists. They aren't scarecrows, they are Jewish central bankers (see Q post #135 - #138). That is EXACTLY what they are: no need for scapegoats or euphemisms.
I find it amusing that you think capitalism and totalitarianism are mutually exclusive, when they are not -- and indeed together can create quite a startling power if done correctly.
Not in the good way though.
Capitalism and Totalitarianism ARE mutually exclusive, it has been the leftists brainwashing propaganda to redefine what Capitalism is, and to Blame it on the worlds problems
Capitalism is not a planned system, It cannot actually exist without liberties and freedom, anything under a Totalitarian system is not Capitalism, China is NOT a capitalist country. what these Cabal assholes are trying to create is basically a modern Feudal system, of "lords" and Serfs".
"Capitalism" is a marxist construct. It's a sad reflection of how much Marxism went to infect the world and even Western mainstream thinking such that people think "capitalism" means something it doesn't.
Capitalism means the concentration of all the capital in an elite group. This is what Marx's was ranting against. (Sound familiar? What is the Schwab cohort and their master's but "capitalism"?)
Before Marx, there was no such thing as "capitalism". If Marxism had never arrived or infiltrated in the way it did, what would we call what we want and what is the NATURAL system of economic and financial operation?
Free-Marketism. Free-markets, where everyone is free to trade, without govt intervention or the monopoly of oligarchs and "capitalists". (Oligarchs dictate control over the market via unfair means, including control of govts)
Personally, I think the distinction is really, really important, and not just because I abhor how massively the lies of Marxism have infiltrated even the minds of thinking people.
"Capitalist" accentuates, perpetuates and highlights the view that money is somehow inherently valuable, somehow something to be desired and sought after in and of itself. It's that mindset that props up Wall Street and the very corrupt materialistic 'western' corruption.
Free Market economics accentuates and emphasizes the view that freedom is inherently valuable, that freedom in all things, including economic activity, allows greater development, prosperity and MORE freedom.
In my opinion, that is...
Reject "Capitalism", embrace Free Market Economics. It's what most people mean when they say Capitalism, but their erroneous use of the term keeps alive the Marxist lie of Communism vs Capitalism. Illusion of choice. Without "Capitalism", Marxism is dead in the water.
I mean, are we WILLING for them to call us "antivaxxers"? Or do we want to recognize that most of us are in fact simply "Pro-choice" or even "anti-mandate"?
This is HOW Marxism and the devil's lies work. They create labels, and get people to embrace them. Labels that THEY (Marxism, and the Devil) define.
That's the only reason America and the Western world adopted this expression "Capitalism". They let Communism define the playing field. Today, we see how very dangerous that sort of capitulation of the field is.
if lsrael is the enemy - what does that make Hitler and Radical lslam
Hitler was protecting his people from the freemasons, bankers, media and others. It just so happened that the overwhelming majority of these types were Jews, just like how it is now in America. Actually, even back then he called out America for our whole media being owned and run by Jewish people.
When I think about his quote about "the small international clique that sets the people of the world against each other and does not want them to have peace" the first thing that comes to mind is freemasons. He was right on about about the media being a major tool in accomplishing these things.
I can't say for sure (I have more reading/audiobooking to do) but maybe his hatred of Jewish people was more just a hatred for the bankers taking advantage of people, freemasons and everything they do, the corrupt media, the brainwashing arts (he hated that plays in Germany would often promote perversion), etc. Because as I said, and as we all know, those were all run by Jewish people, just like in America now. 2% of the German population and yet they seemed to be the only ones not starving from the super inflation caused by unfair WWI reparations and Jewish banksters in America crashing the stock market and calling on debt.
That he fought back against these people, when they are used to world leaders bending the knee, is why he has been lied about in the history books and in all types of media ever since. He closed all the freemason lodges in Germany. Once the Wehrmacht was forced into a world war and starting running through everyone's shit, they even allowed the citizens of the countries they took over to explore the lodges there as an exhibit to show them what they'd been allowing. So, if you take all of that and also believe the studies/tests from people from a couple different countries that claim zyklon-b was never in the camp showers...then Hitler seems like a fucking legendary hero.
If America wasn't owned by satanic bankers, we would have either remained neutral or joined the Axis Powers, or at least aided Germany in the European theater. Hitler had great respect for the people of America and Britain, until of course Britain and France ignored all of his olive branches and forced another world war, which America later joined.
"totalitarian New World Order Zionists", i.e. capitalists.