And, yes, some anons are going to notice associations others don't. I've found some of the content I spend the most time on gets little traction, and crap I just post at random does well here.
Doesn't stop me from digging and sharing my work, even if it's just so somebody can point out a flaw in what I'm putting together.
I appreciate your content. Keep it coming. We are all taking shots in the dark. Some sticks and gains traction while some really good thoughts sometimes do not.
I have to admit, mea culpa. Yeah, I think you're right. Hard not to admit I might be suffering from a bit of unconscious concerntrollity.
But working through the responses (like yours) has been an opportunity to apply some more analysis and work on the problem, which I summarized in a comment below. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated (but not required):
The Q operation is clear (in my mind) but I have a hard time figuring out how some anons see all the comms they see, by which I mean, figuring out how they conceptualize the who, what, when, where, how, of such non-Q non-Board "comms" in terms of its relationship to Q team specifically.
For many years, I've been trained to apply analysis of multi-dimensional issues, and as a digital soldier since '17, I think I'm also hyper alertish to dis and misinfo. Particularly as I watch new anons and truthers come on board after waking up as normies. (I mean, outside this board, and outside the anon sphere, more in the broadening freedom movement in my country, for example.)
Anyhooo.
"People need to accept some anons are seeing 17 everywhere they look and let them go with it. Kek."
Because they're concern trolls, whether intentionally or unintentionally.
People need to accept some anons are seeing 17 everywhere they look and let them go with it. Kek.
My question was rhetorical; your reply is how I see it as well.
I was agreeing with you and adding my two cents.
And, yes, some anons are going to notice associations others don't. I've found some of the content I spend the most time on gets little traction, and crap I just post at random does well here.
Doesn't stop me from digging and sharing my work, even if it's just so somebody can point out a flaw in what I'm putting together.
Yea I understood your agreement and upvoted it.
I appreciate your content. Keep it coming. We are all taking shots in the dark. Some sticks and gains traction while some really good thoughts sometimes do not.
I have to admit, mea culpa. Yeah, I think you're right. Hard not to admit I might be suffering from a bit of unconscious concerntrollity.
But working through the responses (like yours) has been an opportunity to apply some more analysis and work on the problem, which I summarized in a comment below. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated (but not required):
The Q operation is clear (in my mind) but I have a hard time figuring out how some anons see all the comms they see, by which I mean, figuring out how they conceptualize the who, what, when, where, how, of such non-Q non-Board "comms" in terms of its relationship to Q team specifically.
For many years, I've been trained to apply analysis of multi-dimensional issues, and as a digital soldier since '17, I think I'm also hyper alertish to dis and misinfo. Particularly as I watch new anons and truthers come on board after waking up as normies. (I mean, outside this board, and outside the anon sphere, more in the broadening freedom movement in my country, for example.)
Anyhooo.
"People need to accept some anons are seeing 17 everywhere they look and let them go with it. Kek."
Solid advice.