Last December, a space force officer did a podcast interview about bitcoin. He said he was given permission to be in uniform which I thought was unusual.
As soon as there is a Space National Guard I'm in! Tired of Air National Guard leadership bowing down to the medical cartel. If I make it past the vaccine mandate without getting kicked out, I'd love to use my information security background for the Space Force.
Took me a while to go back in my archive to find. I don't remember where I saved it from... 8 Chan or Twitter perhaps... but thought it was funny. Edited a catbox link just above
Hmmm. I'll confess, not getting it. My point was, tippy top was requested (by an anon) and tippy top was delivered (by Q+), I believe. Not "tip top" tho.
Am I missing something?
Remember: no outside comms. I guess that plausible deniability works here, but again, "tip top" shape itself is so common as to allow for no correlation. But when tippy top was requested, it came though, and that context was confirmation. Exact same phrase, I believe.
That context does not exist here.
I'm just rather wary of some anons reading TOO much into things, instead of applying logical thinking, due diligence, and empirical evidence.
Not saying it ain't. Just saying that I cannot say it is, either.
That was only ever intended by Q for one single purpose: to notify us that anyone claiming to be him but posting anywhere else but the chans with his unique tripcode was an impostor.
IMHO tip top is comms because it's rarely used these days, and Trump uses it along with tippy top. He isn't OCD about saying only the latter.
I guess I'm wondering, tho, how do comms coming through someone at spaceforce interconnect with Q stuff. Is the idea here that the Great Awakening has spread so much, that now it's spilled outside of Q team, and non-Q team pedes be communicating and sharing?
As randomly disguised comms to inspire, uplift morale, etc.
We watched as Q and Q+ danced their dance which confirmed in so many ways the veracity of Q project. And Dan S has to know that many, many anons are looking at his stuff and interpreting and everything.
But What I found so powerful about Q was that there was such overwhelming context, proofs and tangible stuff that verified the operation. Q proofs was one, but the impact of the work, the effects (like bringing together awesome patriots from around the globe), and the awakening that's been ongoing since, etc, these all serve to verify, and reinforce, in my view.
But I wonder about some of the stuff that pedes float. I guess I'm strongly inclined to not engage with hopium, as I see it. I've often (tried to) make the pun of Hopermectin. Not hopium (nto air) but substance.
Anyway, someone above commented in response to my 'no outside comms' comment that folks who post that are 'concern trolls'. hard to deny. Probably true in my case, to some extent. Having lived in lockdown state terrorism for the better part of 2 years has kind of put me on edge.
Summation: The Q operation is clear (in my mind) but I have a hard time figuring out how some anons see all the comms they see, by which I mean, figuring out how they conceptualize the who, what, when, where, how, of such non-Q non-Board "comms" in terms of its relationship to Q team specifically.
Any thoughts or reflections would be welcome. In the meantime, I guess I'll just have to learn to park my 'concern trollism'.
Side note: I can only find one post which says "no outside comms" as as far as I know, there is no mention of past, present or future. #1318
That is, Q never stated whether there might or might not be future comms, nor did Q state things would not change in the future.
Interestingly enough, Q DID post about future comms. 3 times, the following.
[Future Comms]
Pre_stage ele_y
Pre_stage sec_y
Pre_stage dir_y
Pre_stage cap_y
[OnReady]
Q
However, what this refers to is anybody's guess. Whether it pertained to comms that have already taken place, or comms that have not yet taken place, which anons can know?
Also, whether the info was for Q team operatives, anons, the deep state or who, that also I have no idea at this point.
Why do people continue to use "no outside comms" for any comms unrelated to Qcommunication itself? I have always been under the impression that phrase related to Q's direct communication to us thru the chans. Any comms that refer to Q drops arent outside comms they are proofs.
And, yes, some anons are going to notice associations others don't. I've found some of the content I spend the most time on gets little traction, and crap I just post at random does well here.
Doesn't stop me from digging and sharing my work, even if it's just so somebody can point out a flaw in what I'm putting together.
I appreciate your content. Keep it coming. We are all taking shots in the dark. Some sticks and gains traction while some really good thoughts sometimes do not.
I have to admit, mea culpa. Yeah, I think you're right. Hard not to admit I might be suffering from a bit of unconscious concerntrollity.
But working through the responses (like yours) has been an opportunity to apply some more analysis and work on the problem, which I summarized in a comment below. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated (but not required):
The Q operation is clear (in my mind) but I have a hard time figuring out how some anons see all the comms they see, by which I mean, figuring out how they conceptualize the who, what, when, where, how, of such non-Q non-Board "comms" in terms of its relationship to Q team specifically.
For many years, I've been trained to apply analysis of multi-dimensional issues, and as a digital soldier since '17, I think I'm also hyper alertish to dis and misinfo. Particularly as I watch new anons and truthers come on board after waking up as normies. (I mean, outside this board, and outside the anon sphere, more in the broadening freedom movement in my country, for example.)
Anyhooo.
"People need to accept some anons are seeing 17 everywhere they look and let them go with it. Kek."
I am still curious with space force. Knew one guy that had a job there in Cali and said it was toxic AF but other than him have never met anyone who knew anything. It's probably Intel mainly and he wasn't Intel so he wouldn't know the goings ons.
Tippy top
https://greatawakening.win/p/141YkqRBxN/x/c/4OTQ09BvCcC
Prayer made prayer answered. God bless u guardians.
I caught that too!
Caught what
Tip Top refers to a Q drop
Yes it does. We are also getting more comms today about something else. Did u read the links given.
I created this infographic yesterday after seeing the Tweet-
https://greatawakening.win/p/141ro9FClD/good-thing-we-have-developmental/c/
I never caught the tippy top from 2016.
Do you think that was what the anon who requested "tip top" on that great proof, or do you think that anon was a plant as part of the plan to prove Q?
I don't think it matters in the big scheme of things, but either theory is plausible.
Man I love these guys. 😁🙏👍☝️
Tippy top huh? https://greatawakening.win/p/141YkqRBxN/how-is-this-possible/ Thank you.
All I can do is smile. Time to pray. Praise the Lord!!
Thanks for spending time with us.
I feel blessed beyond belief to be here with Everyone here. We are in this together. God bless. Much love
https://mobile.twitter.com/gospaceforce/status/1496137727674396684 Sauce 👍🇺🇸
Much obliged enjoy your great digging skills !
Last December, a space force officer did a podcast interview about bitcoin. He said he was given permission to be in uniform which I thought was unusual.
is that spaceforce logo telling us that they prefer Pontiacs?
Poor
Old
Ni...twit
Thinks
It's
A
Cadillac
:)
A 1980 Firebird Trans Am with a chicken on the hood! Good times!
HUGE
TIP TOP
INTENTIONAL MISSPELLING AS IT'S EITHER TIP-TOP OR TIPTOP.
TIP TOP [P:K] (Psychokinetics: war of manifestation)
TIK TOK [Space Force is spreading its dominance of underlying criminal networks on social media spheres and making the world aware of this fact]
TICK TOCK [NCSWIC]
Yes but virtually NO one knows this, making it ineffective comms.
Far more likely IMHO just a guy didn't know, or didn't feel like fucking with the hyphen.
/wordnerd
Not all comms are meant for us.
It's not comms. It's more of a wink
What does this mean to u?
A reference to EASTER???
isnt that when geotus said it?
Yes, with a guy in a white rabbit suit standing next to him
As soon as there is a Space National Guard I'm in! Tired of Air National Guard leadership bowing down to the medical cartel. If I make it past the vaccine mandate without getting kicked out, I'd love to use my information security background for the Space Force.
But it's not "tippy top" shape.
Also, remember when they released their flag in the oval office? They literally unrolled "UFO" in the screen shot.
https://files.catbox.moe/p8ftw5.jpg
Not familiar with this
Took me a while to go back in my archive to find. I don't remember where I saved it from... 8 Chan or Twitter perhaps... but thought it was funny. Edited a catbox link just above
Thank you for coming back with the edit. Interesting.
Funny I was just thinking yesterday. I haven't heard or seen anything about Space Force lately...
If it was tippy top shape, that would be something.
As it is, "tip top shape" is a long established and common expression. Not reading too much into this.
https://qalerts.app/?q=Tip+Top
Do u see yet? Bigger than we know. God is good
...looks like a ' GO ' to me, DS gotta b shittin bricks
Yes thats how it looks to me as well. GO TIME. Praise the Lord thank you JESUS.
Hmmm. I'll confess, not getting it. My point was, tippy top was requested (by an anon) and tippy top was delivered (by Q+), I believe. Not "tip top" tho.
Am I missing something?
Remember: no outside comms. I guess that plausible deniability works here, but again, "tip top" shape itself is so common as to allow for no correlation. But when tippy top was requested, it came though, and that context was confirmation. Exact same phrase, I believe.
That context does not exist here.
I'm just rather wary of some anons reading TOO much into things, instead of applying logical thinking, due diligence, and empirical evidence.
Not saying it ain't. Just saying that I cannot say it is, either.
https://qalerts.app/?q=Tip+Top
This post fills in the gaps. I asked for some comms 9ish days ago. here https://greatawakening.win/p/141YkqRBxN/x/c/4OTQ09BvCcC
Thanks 5614. Wow. OK. That's called context.
thanks for linking me into that thread.
A bit sad tho. The atmosphere here is so good, but someone downdoodles an anon for simply being honest and asking questions. Sigh. such a mean spirit.
Anyway, thanks a bunch.
People misuse that expression all the time.
That was only ever intended by Q for one single purpose: to notify us that anyone claiming to be him but posting anywhere else but the chans with his unique tripcode was an impostor.
IMHO tip top is comms because it's rarely used these days, and Trump uses it along with tippy top. He isn't OCD about saying only the latter.
"People misuse that expression all the time."
Yeah, you're right. That's quite true.
I guess I'm wondering, tho, how do comms coming through someone at spaceforce interconnect with Q stuff. Is the idea here that the Great Awakening has spread so much, that now it's spilled outside of Q team, and non-Q team pedes be communicating and sharing?
As randomly disguised comms to inspire, uplift morale, etc.
We watched as Q and Q+ danced their dance which confirmed in so many ways the veracity of Q project. And Dan S has to know that many, many anons are looking at his stuff and interpreting and everything.
But What I found so powerful about Q was that there was such overwhelming context, proofs and tangible stuff that verified the operation. Q proofs was one, but the impact of the work, the effects (like bringing together awesome patriots from around the globe), and the awakening that's been ongoing since, etc, these all serve to verify, and reinforce, in my view.
But I wonder about some of the stuff that pedes float. I guess I'm strongly inclined to not engage with hopium, as I see it. I've often (tried to) make the pun of Hopermectin. Not hopium (nto air) but substance.
Anyway, someone above commented in response to my 'no outside comms' comment that folks who post that are 'concern trolls'. hard to deny. Probably true in my case, to some extent. Having lived in lockdown state terrorism for the better part of 2 years has kind of put me on edge.
Summation: The Q operation is clear (in my mind) but I have a hard time figuring out how some anons see all the comms they see, by which I mean, figuring out how they conceptualize the who, what, when, where, how, of such non-Q non-Board "comms" in terms of its relationship to Q team specifically.
Any thoughts or reflections would be welcome. In the meantime, I guess I'll just have to learn to park my 'concern trollism'.
It's not concern trolling to say Q said "No comms on any other platform, past, present, or future."
Side note: I can only find one post which says "no outside comms" as as far as I know, there is no mention of past, present or future. #1318
That is, Q never stated whether there might or might not be future comms, nor did Q state things would not change in the future.
Interestingly enough, Q DID post about future comms. 3 times, the following.
[Future Comms]
Pre_stage ele_y
Pre_stage sec_y
Pre_stage dir_y
Pre_stage cap_y
[OnReady]
Q
However, what this refers to is anybody's guess. Whether it pertained to comms that have already taken place, or comms that have not yet taken place, which anons can know?
Also, whether the info was for Q team operatives, anons, the deep state or who, that also I have no idea at this point.
We just saw it reposted here yesterday, can't remember the drop number but it looks like:
NO outside comms
No comms on any other platform past/present/future [spelled out in this fashion with slashes]
Any statement contradicting this is FAKE NEWS [all caps] and should be disregarded
EDIT: Found it, Q513:
NO private comms past/present/future.
NO comms made outside of this platform.
Any claims that contradict the above should be considered FAKE NEWS and disregarded immediately.
Q
Why do people continue to use "no outside comms" for any comms unrelated to Qcommunication itself? I have always been under the impression that phrase related to Q's direct communication to us thru the chans. Any comms that refer to Q drops arent outside comms they are proofs.
Because they're concern trolls, whether intentionally or unintentionally.
People need to accept some anons are seeing 17 everywhere they look and let them go with it. Kek.
My question was rhetorical; your reply is how I see it as well.
I was agreeing with you and adding my two cents.
And, yes, some anons are going to notice associations others don't. I've found some of the content I spend the most time on gets little traction, and crap I just post at random does well here.
Doesn't stop me from digging and sharing my work, even if it's just so somebody can point out a flaw in what I'm putting together.
Yea I understood your agreement and upvoted it.
I appreciate your content. Keep it coming. We are all taking shots in the dark. Some sticks and gains traction while some really good thoughts sometimes do not.
I have to admit, mea culpa. Yeah, I think you're right. Hard not to admit I might be suffering from a bit of unconscious concerntrollity.
But working through the responses (like yours) has been an opportunity to apply some more analysis and work on the problem, which I summarized in a comment below. Any thoughts on this would be appreciated (but not required):
The Q operation is clear (in my mind) but I have a hard time figuring out how some anons see all the comms they see, by which I mean, figuring out how they conceptualize the who, what, when, where, how, of such non-Q non-Board "comms" in terms of its relationship to Q team specifically.
For many years, I've been trained to apply analysis of multi-dimensional issues, and as a digital soldier since '17, I think I'm also hyper alertish to dis and misinfo. Particularly as I watch new anons and truthers come on board after waking up as normies. (I mean, outside this board, and outside the anon sphere, more in the broadening freedom movement in my country, for example.)
Anyhooo.
"People need to accept some anons are seeing 17 everywhere they look and let them go with it. Kek."
Solid advice.
Hmmmmm. Guess you are right.
"No outside proofs" would be kinda, well, dumb, wouldn't it?
At the tip of the top?
BTW about US Space force main logo? This symbol looks very much like the 5 pointed star upwards!
I thought that was very interesting when i noticed it first time.
I am still curious with space force. Knew one guy that had a job there in Cali and said it was toxic AF but other than him have never met anyone who knew anything. It's probably Intel mainly and he wasn't Intel so he wouldn't know the goings ons.