I love that. I am absolutely horrible at chess. Everything you just said is how I understand chess when I watch people play. It’s like watching someone do magic so far ahead in what they are doing I never see it.
Once you realize it isn't random, and that there are a limited number of moves, the whole things becomes trivial.
Just like in poker. Once you understand your general odds of getting any particular hand, you no longer are playing the game, you are playing the mentality of your opponent.
In Chess, masters have memorized nearly every notable tournament game, and every move involved. Names are given to techniques, which makes it easier to recall the pattern on the board formed by the placement of the pieces.
Internalizing these board patterns means you don't have to see 20+ moves ahead, because you already know the 8 or however many number of boards that can eventually result from the one you're currently looking at.
Then, out of the 8 possible boards coming up, you have to anticipate which one your opponent will try to set up. You muster a defense for board set-up number 5 out of the 8 and try to sneakily get your pieces into place to counter. If the opponent is bluffing, you have to plan around that as well.
Ultimately, however, the game that novices usually play is as rigged as tic-tac toe.
These have made it impossible to perfectly craft a procedural AI that wins every time. These two moves, especially castling, have made it impossible to predict the exponential possibilities in a reasonable time frame. Castling can occur on nearly every turn, and drastically changes the game board. The fact you can Castle either Rook means that there is an inherent 50/50 split on every single board pattern possible in the game.
If not for Castling and En Passant, Chess would be fully rigged and about as interesting as tic-tac-toe. 90% of games would end in a stalemate.
In fact, if not for Chess, AI might not be nearly as advanced as it is today:
No, but a lot of them. Along with pharmaceuticals, components went abroad. My family does some business in the used component business. Used components, chips and capacitors, have been selling well lately. These are items that get sold by the ones, not any commercial sized lot. Most of this is to repair existing machines around the world. Chip production being down overall increases demand for surplus. When more chips, etc., were produced in the US, there was more surplus. Now a lot is in stashes that were hoarded.
Good grief. Taiwan is deep state and Putin/Xi are white hats. Michael Bay has made better movies than that. If it turns out to be true, I’ll eat crow while crying in the corner because this whole time I’ve been rooting for evil in its epic battle with another evil. I guess that would be biblical in a revelation 17 kind of way.
Both are in it for themselves. It just so happens they see the writing on the wall and are working with White Hats so long as they see benefit and can get a chuckle out of it.
Not everyone in the Cabal wants a NWO. The Cabal is not homogenous. If you want some idea of their cultural structure, look at Harry Potter. JK Rowling wrote about their "secret societies" and repackaged it as an upstart hero's journey.
Globalists = Death Eaters
Secret Societies = Magic World
Sheep = Muggles
Did the outcome of magic people announcing themselves to the muggles and living in harmony ever exist in the story?
No?
That's because the majority of the Cabal still wish to rule in secret, like they've always done. Voldemort wants to rule overtly. Never would they consider living in harmony with the muggles.
Some think the third option will never work, like Xi and Elon.
But Trump and the Patriots do. They think it's time for magic to be revealed and the wizards and witches to come out of their hidden places of power. I agree. No more secrets.
You could have at least acknowledged Snivellus. He’s only the greatest sleeper of all time. Other than that, I’m not really seeing the allegory. The magic world doesn’t rule over the muggles; not even in secret. The grey hats would be the goblins by your description.
Though, the death eaters/globalists pairing is intriguing. Most are unwitting stooges who follow out of fear or desire for own personal gain. Voldemort did operate in the shadows for sometime and used subversion with great success only to be undone by his own form of TDS toward Potter. Death eaters immediately bail when they see he’s lost. You know what… I’m on board with this one.
The magic world doesn’t rule over the muggles; not even in secret.
Keep in mind they have memory-wiping charms and it's the highest of crimes to do magic before muggles.
There's a whole backlore talking about how after Merlin they realized the muggles couldn't handle knowing magic existed and that they would realize they were powerless compared to magic users. In her lore, muggles rebelled and hunted wizards and witches as a "we must kill them before they kill us" mentality. She hints that the Salem Witch Trials were the turning point where the magic world realized it wasn't working.
Wizards and witches went into hiding, having concluded that the magic world and the muggle world don't mix.
The antagonist, Grindelwald, wants the magic world to announce itself to the muggles and let the pieces fall where they may to prevent a world war that the muggles were going to do to themselves. He argued that the only way to prevent muggles from destroying themselves is to use a heavy hand and no longer just hide and let them do as they will. He was predicting WW2 (the movies take place in the early 1900s) and wanted to prevent it by being the top of the pyramid of the muggle power structures.
The takeaway is that after Grindelwald and WW2, the magic world did just what he wanted, though under the table. The Ministry of Truth became more heavy handed in its efforts to control the muggle world. Leading into the original series, which is set starting in the mid to late 1990's, we see that magic people do in fact have carte blanch control over the muggles and the integration of the two was complete. Magic users and muggles lived together and could have offspring -- mudbloods.
On the premise of "racial" relations, Voldemort came to power with a similar plan as Grindelwald, but based on a seething hatred for muggles. Instead of just ruling over them, he sought to slaughter all muggles but the ones deemed useful.
Anyway, there's a lot here but it isn't entirely on Q, at least for the unaware.
The point is that JK Rowling isn't a globo-homo stooge. She is certainly Cabal, but she is fighting to return to how things "used to be" where the secret societies controlled media and politics, but all these global war-games and centralized commerce systems would fade away as the crazy fantasies that they really are.
On the topic of JK, I did wonder if she was “activated” when it came to the topic of trannies. White hats do seem to place heavy emphasis on culture war.
I think she honestly rebelled on the tranny ideas.
She got pushback on her second Fantastic Beasts film as well, with bad reviews stemming from her TERF views and the use of Johnny Depp as the antagonist in light of his quarrel with Amber Heard, who is a psychotic bitch, apparently.
JK Rowling is a sincere hardcore feminist. That means she refuses the idea that men can appropriate femininity. It's the most obvious explanation.
You have to understand that trannies can never work, and the Cabal knows that. They realize it is self-destructive behavior and that's why they are supporting it -- because they want the ruin of Western civilization. A gender crisis is the most cost-effective way to ruin a culture, because it prevents reproduction and encourages medical dependence. Two birds, one stone.
They want to sterilize people both in body and mind. Even feminists are effectively sterile, which I doubt JK Rowling is willing to admit. 50% or so women under the age of 30 have not yet had a single child. This statistic has never been this bad in the history of human reproduction standards, and it's not just birth control measures that is responsible.
The more you push the gender/sex question, the more you discourage reproduction. When a tribe stops making young people, the tribe will die under the weight of its large number of useless old people.
It is possible she was activated by the Cabal to take the stance she does, but seeing how it has only hurt her financially and publicly, I doubt that. It's more likely that she realizes that she falls on the NWO's chopping block for useless eaters and is, surprisingly, standing on her principles, as flawed they may be.
If anyone is knowledgeable re China/Taiwan relations, I'd be interested to know how we should be viewing any moves China may make against Taiwan. From my POV, Taiwan wants independence and democracy. I'm not clear how such a move by Xi would be to our benefit. Unless Taiwan is another DS stronghold.
Here's a thought... What if Xi really is a white hat??? The CCP and Xi aren't necessarily the same thing... The CCP is definitely cabal but what if Xi has been stuck biding his time??? Just a thought...
https://greatawakening.win/p/141roEuuJQ/again-more-of-whats-going-on-beh/
Right on schedule.
Looks like everyone is making their moves.
It’s like chess whole bunch of nothing then moves everywhere!
To the novice, moving the pawns around is the most boring part of the game.
To a master, he knows that the game is decided when there are no more pawns to move.
The battle is won before the fighting starts. Once the first piece is taken, the number of possibilities decreases rapidly.
I love that. I am absolutely horrible at chess. Everything you just said is how I understand chess when I watch people play. It’s like watching someone do magic so far ahead in what they are doing I never see it.
Once you realize it isn't random, and that there are a limited number of moves, the whole things becomes trivial.
Just like in poker. Once you understand your general odds of getting any particular hand, you no longer are playing the game, you are playing the mentality of your opponent.
In Chess, masters have memorized nearly every notable tournament game, and every move involved. Names are given to techniques, which makes it easier to recall the pattern on the board formed by the placement of the pieces.
Internalizing these board patterns means you don't have to see 20+ moves ahead, because you already know the 8 or however many number of boards that can eventually result from the one you're currently looking at.
Then, out of the 8 possible boards coming up, you have to anticipate which one your opponent will try to set up. You muster a defense for board set-up number 5 out of the 8 and try to sneakily get your pieces into place to counter. If the opponent is bluffing, you have to plan around that as well.
Ultimately, however, the game that novices usually play is as rigged as tic-tac toe.
https://www.quora.com/Is-there-a-way-to-never-lose-at-Tic-Tac-Toe
What makes Chess objectively competitive is the introduction of two mechanics.
Castling
En Passant
These have made it impossible to perfectly craft a procedural AI that wins every time. These two moves, especially castling, have made it impossible to predict the exponential possibilities in a reasonable time frame. Castling can occur on nearly every turn, and drastically changes the game board. The fact you can Castle either Rook means that there is an inherent 50/50 split on every single board pattern possible in the game.
If not for Castling and En Passant, Chess would be fully rigged and about as interesting as tic-tac-toe. 90% of games would end in a stalemate.
In fact, if not for Chess, AI might not be nearly as advanced as it is today:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HwF229U2ba8
Military is the only way. No one said the US Military is the only way.
Why Taiwan, if Xi is a white hat?
Aren't ALL of the computer chips used in the world produced there? That would be a pretty handy thing to be in control of....
That’s why there is a chip shortage. The intellectual property there is gone
No, but a lot of them. Along with pharmaceuticals, components went abroad. My family does some business in the used component business. Used components, chips and capacitors, have been selling well lately. These are items that get sold by the ones, not any commercial sized lot. Most of this is to repair existing machines around the world. Chip production being down overall increases demand for surplus. When more chips, etc., were produced in the US, there was more surplus. Now a lot is in stashes that were hoarded.
Taiwan could be deepstate as well
Good grief. Taiwan is deep state and Putin/Xi are white hats. Michael Bay has made better movies than that. If it turns out to be true, I’ll eat crow while crying in the corner because this whole time I’ve been rooting for evil in its epic battle with another evil. I guess that would be biblical in a revelation 17 kind of way.
Xi is a Gray Hat, like Elon Musk.
Both are in it for themselves. It just so happens they see the writing on the wall and are working with White Hats so long as they see benefit and can get a chuckle out of it.
Not everyone in the Cabal wants a NWO. The Cabal is not homogenous. If you want some idea of their cultural structure, look at Harry Potter. JK Rowling wrote about their "secret societies" and repackaged it as an upstart hero's journey.
Globalists = Death Eaters
Secret Societies = Magic World
Sheep = Muggles
Did the outcome of magic people announcing themselves to the muggles and living in harmony ever exist in the story?
No?
That's because the majority of the Cabal still wish to rule in secret, like they've always done. Voldemort wants to rule overtly. Never would they consider living in harmony with the muggles.
Some think the third option will never work, like Xi and Elon.
But Trump and the Patriots do. They think it's time for magic to be revealed and the wizards and witches to come out of their hidden places of power. I agree. No more secrets.
You could have at least acknowledged Snivellus. He’s only the greatest sleeper of all time. Other than that, I’m not really seeing the allegory. The magic world doesn’t rule over the muggles; not even in secret. The grey hats would be the goblins by your description.
Though, the death eaters/globalists pairing is intriguing. Most are unwitting stooges who follow out of fear or desire for own personal gain. Voldemort did operate in the shadows for sometime and used subversion with great success only to be undone by his own form of TDS toward Potter. Death eaters immediately bail when they see he’s lost. You know what… I’m on board with this one.
Keep in mind they have memory-wiping charms and it's the highest of crimes to do magic before muggles.
There's a whole backlore talking about how after Merlin they realized the muggles couldn't handle knowing magic existed and that they would realize they were powerless compared to magic users. In her lore, muggles rebelled and hunted wizards and witches as a "we must kill them before they kill us" mentality. She hints that the Salem Witch Trials were the turning point where the magic world realized it wasn't working.
Wizards and witches went into hiding, having concluded that the magic world and the muggle world don't mix.
JK Rowling tried to expound on this ideal, that the two don't mix, in her newer novels: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wizarding_World#Fantastic_Beasts_films
The antagonist, Grindelwald, wants the magic world to announce itself to the muggles and let the pieces fall where they may to prevent a world war that the muggles were going to do to themselves. He argued that the only way to prevent muggles from destroying themselves is to use a heavy hand and no longer just hide and let them do as they will. He was predicting WW2 (the movies take place in the early 1900s) and wanted to prevent it by being the top of the pyramid of the muggle power structures.
The takeaway is that after Grindelwald and WW2, the magic world did just what he wanted, though under the table. The Ministry of Truth became more heavy handed in its efforts to control the muggle world. Leading into the original series, which is set starting in the mid to late 1990's, we see that magic people do in fact have carte blanch control over the muggles and the integration of the two was complete. Magic users and muggles lived together and could have offspring -- mudbloods.
On the premise of "racial" relations, Voldemort came to power with a similar plan as Grindelwald, but based on a seething hatred for muggles. Instead of just ruling over them, he sought to slaughter all muggles but the ones deemed useful.
Anyway, there's a lot here but it isn't entirely on Q, at least for the unaware.
The point is that JK Rowling isn't a globo-homo stooge. She is certainly Cabal, but she is fighting to return to how things "used to be" where the secret societies controlled media and politics, but all these global war-games and centralized commerce systems would fade away as the crazy fantasies that they really are.
Good shit. I defer to your knowledge of the lore.
On the topic of JK, I did wonder if she was “activated” when it came to the topic of trannies. White hats do seem to place heavy emphasis on culture war.
I think she honestly rebelled on the tranny ideas.
She got pushback on her second Fantastic Beasts film as well, with bad reviews stemming from her TERF views and the use of Johnny Depp as the antagonist in light of his quarrel with Amber Heard, who is a psychotic bitch, apparently.
JK Rowling is a sincere hardcore feminist. That means she refuses the idea that men can appropriate femininity. It's the most obvious explanation.
You have to understand that trannies can never work, and the Cabal knows that. They realize it is self-destructive behavior and that's why they are supporting it -- because they want the ruin of Western civilization. A gender crisis is the most cost-effective way to ruin a culture, because it prevents reproduction and encourages medical dependence. Two birds, one stone.
They want to sterilize people both in body and mind. Even feminists are effectively sterile, which I doubt JK Rowling is willing to admit. 50% or so women under the age of 30 have not yet had a single child. This statistic has never been this bad in the history of human reproduction standards, and it's not just birth control measures that is responsible.
The more you push the gender/sex question, the more you discourage reproduction. When a tribe stops making young people, the tribe will die under the weight of its large number of useless old people.
It is possible she was activated by the Cabal to take the stance she does, but seeing how it has only hurt her financially and publicly, I doubt that. It's more likely that she realizes that she falls on the NWO's chopping block for useless eaters and is, surprisingly, standing on her principles, as flawed they may be.
Right then a left! 💥💥. Waiting patiently for the knockout punch.
If anyone is knowledgeable re China/Taiwan relations, I'd be interested to know how we should be viewing any moves China may make against Taiwan. From my POV, Taiwan wants independence and democracy. I'm not clear how such a move by Xi would be to our benefit. Unless Taiwan is another DS stronghold.
Here's a thought... What if Xi really is a white hat??? The CCP and Xi aren't necessarily the same thing... The CCP is definitely cabal but what if Xi has been stuck biding his time??? Just a thought...
What if? What if the Seahawks win the SB next year too. Well, if your a fan, that would be great! Lets work on fighting the cabal instead.
You're funny... Cheers Anon... ☕☕☕
Ukraine I can sort of understand, but how is it a good thing if China invades Taiwan?