What did Kash Patel mean by this on Truth Social? It was retruthed by the @Q account as well.
(media.greatawakening.win)
💥 BQQQQQQQQQM 💥
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (339)
sorted by:
What a retard you are. Seriously.
Stop creating narratives in your own head, and learn to read. What a 'effin, fuckwit.
Nope. I for one totally agree with this person. The, cry foul, oh no me feelz, you stickied this and you stickied that of someone or this topic, that subject was stickied. Sticky sticky sticky. Ridiculous. We are in a global state of emergence on a digital, virtual and physical battlefield with all fronts of total shit show going on and the "anons" of the great awakening care about and snivel about stickies. It is "in my opinion" pathetically trivial.
Well, I 100% agree with that. I never said it was important. I also recognized that the mods are doing what their doing. The anon simply asked a question why this happens. I answered.
I mentioned that for some, it encourages them to see their work being valued and used. No one cried foul. No one complained. Jeepers. Like this dude, you're making stuff up in your head. Your thinking that people make a big deal of this. They don't. It's bullshit, the idea that they do. Unless its you. Actually, you and this dumbwit are making a big deal of this, in your own fricken heads.
And global battlefield aside, we're all here offering our time and effort and input.
If you do not understand how morale is important in this war, you're a dumdum.
There is about a million miles of difference between some redditor getting his thrills because he gets some sort of upvotes, and anons who are putting in their time, effort, sweat tears and blood for the sake of the fricken planet.
I notice that you've contributed very, very little to these boards. So perhaps you really just a spectator. So why on earth should any of us take your view or opinion seriously?
When Q was posting, Q posted a WHOLE section of anons on twitter. Why? Sometimes it was a patriot or anon with less than 100 followers, Some, tens of thousands. Why? One reason is morale. And when someone made a powerful post, interpretation, and Q reposted and connected to them, can you understand how this helps them to invest more? Probably not.
maybe you're a stirling citizen out there and you're so busy doing things in your local community to raise the awareness of the world, so you just don't have time to contribute here. Or maybe you just lurk, consume, and don't really have anything of value to contribute anyway.
Either way, your opinion counts for nothing, really, does it? Like him, yoru wetdreaming over other people who you THINK are wetdreaming over stickies and stuff, its really just sad. You have no sense of community, of solidarity. you're an outsider here, because you cannot even relate to what it means to have skin in the game, and invest your heart, brain, effort and time to contribute to this war. At least, not here, anyway.
Get your head out of your arse, stop believing your own fantasies about anons here who you imagine give two shits about some sort of ego-fed reddit glory, and see what the 'f we are doing.
Seriously. Could you possibly be MORE self-absorbed?
The riddled assumptions here are unnecessary but makes it clear that is the way to innuendo and preface a convoluted point into an obvious, possessed, superiority complex. I will leave this as, assume as you will of intentions of others, what they do, or doing. I made nothing up. Plenty of crying and sniveling over stickies in comments by posters. Btw I served my country, dont attempt to preach to me about morale and what it takes in "this war"
My opinion count for anything? It does to those it impacts, others like yourself, I could care less if it does or not. In the real world it certainly does, in candyland on the internet like here for instance it may or may not and thats exceptional because I have no shits to give about it. PS if my opinion didn't matter why was it necessary to type up 2 lines of reasonable debate and 9 lines of nonsense to reply to a trivial topic lol.
Ill give you a B+ for the brother has heart and higher ground approach, was decent but easily discernible. Im sure you wont be able to resist that burning complex need to NOT reply so carry on with your superior self. Cheers
hahah
"Im sure you wont be able to resist that burning complex need to NOT reply so carry on with your superior self."
Alright. I accept that. Ironic that you just couldn't make your point without a kick in the shins and a dig in the ribs on the way out. But I did lay it on thick, so fair's fair.
That said, perhaps its worth dispensing with the rhetorical playing of games.
"PS if my opinion didn't matter why was it necessary to type up 2 lines..." I write. Occupational hazard.
Anyway, yeah, my comment was riddled with assumptions. And, I was uncharacteristically reactive, based on what the turd guy wrote.
I appreciate you sharing information about your service.
However, (in what might be a vain attempt to dial the exchange back into some semblance of reasonableness), I'll say, you agree with that guy. I disagree.
Unlike him, you stated your viewpoint civilly. I think the view you expressed was overly generalized, narrow in its conception, and frankly, rather arrogant and stuck up. But whatever. That's my view. I could have expressed that without making 1000 assumptions or going on a diatribe, but as I said, I was reactive.
But, whatever, I'll agree to disagree.
Yeah I see this point. I took. It as a generalization out of frustration, which is partially true. Indicating the culture deficiency behind such particular emphasis on insignificant things based on relevant scope of actualties