This got me thinking. If you watch the explanation of David Lauer on how high frequency trading occurs on Wallstreet, it's incredible: high frequency trading with sophisticated algorithms. Unknown to many people, financial institutions have incredibly fast fiber-optic cables directly connected to the NYSE server. And believe it or not, these financial institution's computers practically live in the same basement as the NYSE servers.
Unfortunately, WE (the people) don't have that immediate access to the markets like THEY (DS) do. Our government allows these financial institutions to use sophisticated algorithms to even 'predict' how the market will respond within micro-seconds. Yes, micro-seconds. It's incredible, the sheer volume of our market is traded by algorithms alone, really boxing out any type of human intervention. And if you add all this up, you'll come to the simple conclusion that our entire stock market is one massive fraud, one algorithm battling another.
Imagine how artificial intelligence (AI) could be leveraged to capitalize on this, and even as far as 'predicting' into the future? Imagine if AI had the ability to predict human events and how we would react to them? Imagine if AI could shape then entire economic/financial system based on these algorithms? Imagine if this has already happened and how dangerous AI really can be….
What if there are classified AI (machine learning) programs that are so advance that they are able to 'peek' into the future based on what is written, on TV and other media formats? That the AI is able to discern and "predict" future events based off of what it can analzye - or what is published to the internet.
Imagine AI so advance that not only can it 'peek' into the future anymore but it can actually manipulate how we perceive our own reality? That at the end of the day, all the AI algos care about is its true function & design: PROFITS. And the absolute best way of achieving a desired outcome, is to control the rules, ie, distort our own reality. It's not that advance AI needs to 'predict' outcomes anymore, it's that they are able create the CONDITIONS necessary for the DESIRED OUTCOMES.
What if the reason why Q (quantum computing) exists was a way to bypass these AI algorithms in order to communicate with us -while at the same time - making it difficult for AI algos to pick up what is being communicated? No matter how technical computers and AI can be, they have a massive flaw. It's a flaw that makes us human: context, emotions & illogical behavior. This is why ‘memes’ are effective. Humans, by nature, are unpredictable.
What if AI algos created the 4am talking points in order to 'control' the narrative? That the financial institutions and our media are inseparable?
What if, in some way, the Matrix is actually real?
Edit: One more thing: The stock market is effectively built on “confidence”, which is really “perception” (and you can see where I’m going with this based on my above comments). For example, we can see how quickly a good day in the markets can immediately go south simply based on national and international events. Imagine if something so wild as to admit that we have aliens who live on the moon or we have all these cures and technological advancements that can propel our civilization… how quickly the public’s faith in these institutions would dissolve, like the financial institution. And if that happens, you pull the plug on everything. An awake public is literally what they fear… for this very reason.
If people refuse to believe in the system, then they are free from control.
No, Q is not AI.
Characterizing Q as AI is nothing more than a psyop to dehumanize Q. People who should be called heroes are reduced to mere software.
Nothing is gained from characterizing Q as AI.
Did AI put a Q stocking under the Christmas tree at the white house? Explain how software can do that.
Did software take hundreds of photos, images above North Korea, photos of boxes in apple stores, follow Snowden around in Russia, etc? No.
Trump confirmed Q in time deltas, not the other way around. Q would post, then Trump would do a delta a minute. Because it is not noteworthy if Q posts a minute after Trump (anyone can do that).
Occam's razor, what is more likely, software from the future predicted Trump was going to post, or Trump coordinated posting times with Q?
Q said they know future events because of control.
That means Q controlled when no name was put to death, and controlled the newspapers printing the exact time of death.
The whole push to characterize Q as AI started with Alex Jones and his associates, a Mossad psyop to dehumanize Q. Because getting you to believe Q is software rather than patriots shakes the box hoping for a different result (you no longer support Q because you may be creeped out by software). Not to mention software doesn't have free speech rights.
No I don't believe Q is AI.
But the part about the markets using algos was right at least!
Oh look! Someone stepped out of his echo chamber and admitted, astutely I might add, as I did the other day, that military intelligence might have something akin to AI (so call it an algorithm, doesn't fucking matter if it's self aware or not, weirdo, it's still a MACHINE) that has given them superhuman insight in order to accomplish something they could not have accomplished on their own. I used gun as the example, which you ridiculed, but here you are using a spoon.
My god. I'm just gonna block you again. Because you're still at it with this "Q is an AI is a Deep State psyop to dehumanize Q" without giving a rationale for said psyop. The fuck does it matter if Q is dehumanized or not? What on earth would the Deep State stand to gain from that kind narrative? At least provide that if you're going to keep repeating it like a fucking mantra.
Q is an A.I. I’m about 99% sure. Because I know where the team most likely is that works with Q. Tick-Tock is the perfect clue.
What happened to Alex's butt buddy "Zack" or whatever?
LOL. That was such BS. Zack " Our man who is in direct contact with Q" or however he said it. Alex Jones didn't even know about Q until almost 2 months after Q rolled out the first posts. Then he came up with a BS explanation as to why he was ignorant. In order to stay relevant and not lose viewers, he came up with Zack and Corsi who did the worst Q updates that I had ever heard!! He was extremely pathetic. It was painfully obvious he had not even read the posts before he attempted to explain them. I quit watching Jones at that point. It was just too fake.
yet infowars articles and videos continue to get posted here . . .
What don't you get about this being an open forum? People can post stuff that might be pertinent. Not everything is an absolute lie on Alex Jones. That is the art of Controlled Opposition. Give the people about 90-95 % truth , then slip in your propaganda when the people trust you.
I remember AJ talking about Google's plan to use AI and data mining to essentially predict the future many years ago. He wasn't wrong. Something as simple as "recommended" videos are the first stages of this. When you consider what types of data are available to be mined, the idea of "predicting the future" with AI is not ridiculous at all. As for his position on Q, I still believe his response is nothing more than a hissy fit. He's upset because his viewership dropped dramatically once Q gained popularity. It has to be frustrating to see many of his ideas discussed on other platforms long after he brought them to the surface. I think AJ knows that Q is legit, but doesn't want to go all-in since it would seem someone knows more than he does. I can't deny AJ's ego, but I also can't deny his passion.
This fucking guy again. I blocked you twice. Why do I still see your posts?