🚨🚨Special Counsel Michael Gableman just called for Wisconsin to be decertified🚨🚨
(twitter.com)
LET'S GOOoOo
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (71)
sorted by:
It would essentially disprove free will if you could successfully predict events years into the future on a specific date. Humans are notoriously unpredictable and the human spirit is unfactorable in equations. When you take 4000 shots chances are many will align especially if there's no deadline, and esp. if people in power can act on them retroactively. Self fulfilling prophecy in other words.
The general population is extremely predictable. People who can’t reflect are extremely predictable. We’re creatures of habit and routine. The unpredictability you’re talking about is a lot more rare than you think. Most of the Bible explains all of the scenarios that might test you, how do you think they did that.
The whole problem, reaction, solution train works both ways. You set up events and you can predict what they’re going to do with the resources they have.
But most Q drops are not predicting the general population. They're predicting top level people and actions.
Our theories of time travel are just that, theories. (for the population) It could be that things are very resistant to change. We don't really know. It does seem that introducing something new would have an impact later on, but instead of a series of dominoes, perhaps it's more like diminishing returns at each ripple caused. People could potentially be posting stuff from the future all the time, but we lack the respect of those things in order to allow them to influence us.
Free will, yes. It exists, IMO.
But with a large sample size, things can be predicted with startling accuracy. I don't know that I'll be in a car accident tomorrow, but I know that of all the vehicle accidents tomorrow in the USA there will be about 100 deaths. We can know roughly how many people will be injured by fireworks next year, no matter the public safety warnings.
I think Q is working with different data, bigger data, using different algorithms, to predict things beyond what we normally think of as statistics.
Suicide weekend... They don't say who, because I think they don't know. But they can probably predict the numbers based on what gets released (and when).
The world is beautiful and awful, but alot of it is just numbers and patterns. That doesn't take away free will.
I think confirmation bias plays a HUGE role in all of this.
Is it really a prediction to say "suicide weekend" with no date, expiration date, or names attached? I mean, you or I could make the same "prediction" and it would eventually come true.
Same with stuff like "first unsealed indictment will shock the world" ... well, we've already had several unsealed indictments via Durham, but I guess we're just ignoring those..
You're not wrong. I'm sure I'm as guilty of confirmation bias as the next pede. Like some see signs of "end of days" in everything.
Yet, some of the Q posts have been surprisingly dead on.
If we've all been played, it has been one successful psyop, I'll give 'em that.
They've been dead on because there's over 4 thousand of them, there's no expiration, and there's multiple interpretations and ways to connect. And if it is a psyop, it's being done by the same people who are in charge of some of these events and decisions anyway.
It's a mild curiosity to me but I trust nothing. It was shocking to me how many people here deep throated the @Q account on Truth. That alone is enough to show you what's really happening. They're fucking with us. Just don't tell the mods I said it.
One "simple" explanation for the time stuff is that they have access to the internet (say a twitter feed) that is in the future. Perhaps an agent from the future (their present) reports important things that get passed back into the past, perhaps due to quantum stuff. Tweets are small chunks of data but can be information dense. Add a quantum modem and you have time traveling tweets.