WINNING: FDA Rejects Non-mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine For Children: Company
(www.zerohedge.com)
🏆 WINS OF THE DAY 🏆
Comments (10)
sorted by:
Actually, if you're going to get vaccinated against something, the NON-mRNA is the way to go because it doesn't have the same DNA altering components as mRNA vaccines. They are more traditional in nature like a polio or measles vax. The only part of this that is a win, is the fact that it wasn't approved for children...none of them should be...mRNA or not. If I were forced at gunpoint to pick a c-19 vax to take, I'd pick this one rejected by the FDA in a heartbeat.
True, the principles of the conventional vaccine are sound, the problem seems to be the other ingredients.
Exactly. This is not winning. Winning is the FDA not approving any Covid vax for kids. Indeed, this is worse, since it promotes the idea that mRNA vaccines are safer, which we know is a lie.
This is why Trump took the J&J one.
Science doesn’t support it. But I bet ol’ Joe will speak this evening telling people to ignore the FDA and get vaxx’d. And Fauci will suddenly make a CNN appearance after waffling on how past we are the pandemic or not, and don’t forget to wear 5 masks over the 1st and booster 3 times after the 4th one! Idiots!
I only have a few questions here. As we have suspected for some time, it has not been proven that the SARS-CoV2 even exists as there are no isolated and purified samples held anywhere - even though many claim to posses isolated viruses. How then can a vaxxine claim to be using an inactivated virus that does not exist? What Frankenstein cocktail are they using and calling it a virus? India claims to have isolated the virus and are growing it in green monkey kidney cells. Nothing to go wrong with this, right? Then they are deactivating whatever the hell they claim to have and adding an aluminum based adjuvant. Something really good for children - especially the ones already suffering from developmental disorders. Not only are there no samples of a purified virus available anywhere, there are also no studies that show that the so called SARS-CoV2 is the pathogen responsible for Covid.
The whole idea that there are safer vaxxines is ludicrous. No vaxxine is safe and all come with unintended consequences. Unfortunately for most people, those consequences manifest over time and are progressive; thereby, not allowing the consequences to be attributed the vaxxines. As with regards to Covid vaxxines, no child should be given a vaxxine for an illness that they are not at risk for death or serious illness. There are no benefits to outweigh the substantial risks.
They only want the MRNA type.
Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times
Ocugen said the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) declined to issue an emergency use authorization for Covaxin, the COVID-19 vaccine developed by its Indian partner Bharat Biotech, for children.
Not one of the FDA's big 3 companies (the 3 corporations most likely to fill FDA positions in the revolving door of oversite which practically results in self oversite for the big 3)? -- strike 1
Not MRNA based? -- strike 2
Comes from a country that told Pfizer to get bent? -- strike 3
You're out!
How is that winning? I would rather take the Non-mRNA one than the one that permanently fucks with immune system.