Been trying to wrap my head around the fact that in 1945 the US was the good guy. Then it seems to have flipped by 1950 and we the citizens became targets of multilayered threats by govt/cabal. (Extermination). The Nazi Op Paperclip is all i come up with as reason to go light to dark. But i think the explanation may be more nuanced.
This topic made me go back and read a paper I wrote in college a few years ago on the use of herbicides in Vietnam. We've been in this business a LONG time:
"During the 1920's the United States took the lead in promoting international prohibitions of chemical and biological warfare. One effort, the 1922 Treaty of Washington outlawing ‘the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases’ was ratified by the U.S. Senate but rejected by France because of provisions, unrelated to chemical warfare, that placed strict limitations on submarines. The treaty never went into effect. In 1925 the United States tried again with the Geneva Protocol, which repeated the earlier ban on chemical weapons and added a prohibition of ‘bacteriological warfare.’ It was sent to the Senate in January 1926, where it met a returning wave of isolationism and a wall of opposition led by the American Legion and the American Chemical Society.”
"The first use of gas in World War I was not the German attack with chlorine in 1915 but a French attack in 1914-with tear gas."
In 1969-1970, "India, Mexico, Pakistan, Sweden and 17 other nations proposed in the General Assembly a resolution holding that the Geneva Protocol prohibits the use in war of all chemical agents directed at men, animals or plants. The resolution was passed by a vote of 80 to three, with 36 abstentions. Portugal, Australia and the U.S. voted against the resolution.”
"The U.S. Army manual The Law of Land Warfare, last issued in the 1950's, states that the Geneva Protocol is ‘not binding on this country’.”
I have 17 pages of research on this topic and it's all very disturbing to see how everything progressed. First, we used plant-growth regulators in the 1930's and 1940's to do positive things like increase the growth-rate for tomatoes by 300x. It only took a few years before we were using the same concept, but in reverse, to destroy plants. Fort Detrick was the main source for this research. Of course, the consequences were deadly to plants, animals, and humans alike. Lord help us.
Bazell, Robert J. “CBW Ban: Nixon Would Exclude Tear Gas and Herbicides”, Science, New Series, Vol. 172, No. 3980 (1971): 246-248. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1731029.
Bennett, Ivan L. “The Significance of Chemical and Biological Warfare for the People”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 65, No. 1 (1970): 271-279. https://www.jstor.org/stable/59759.
Boffey, Philip M. Herbicides in Vietnam: AAAS Study Finds Widespread Devastation, Science, New Series, Vol. 171, No. 3966 (1971): 43-47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1731077.
Carlson, Elof Axel. “Commentary: International Symposium on Herbicides in the Vietnam War: An Appraisal”, Bioscience, Vol. 33, No. 8 (1983): 507-512. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1309140.
“Chemical and Biological Warfare”, Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Vol. 23, No. 4 (1970): 2-14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3823128.
Koppes, Clayton R. “Review: Agent Orange and the Official History of Vietnam”, Reviews in American History, Vol. 13, No. 1 (1985): 131-135. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2702023.
Langer, Elinor. “Chemical and Biological Warfare (I): The Research Program”, Science, New Series, Vol. 155, No. 3759 (1967): 174-179. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1721126.
Langer, Elinor. “Chemical and Biological Warfare (II): The Weapons and the Policies”, Science, New Series, Vol. 155, No. 3760 (1967): 299-303. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1720654.
Massey, Rachel. “The ‘Drug War’ in Colombia: Echoes of Vietnam”, Journal of Public Health Policy, Vol. 22, No. 3 (2001): 280-285. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3343142.
McClintock, Cynthia. “The War on Drugs: The Peruvian Case”, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, Vol. 30, No. 2/3 (1988): 127-142. https://www.jstor.org/stable/165983.
Peterson, Gale E. “The Discovery and Development of 2,4-D”, Agricultural History, Vol. 41, No. 3 (1967): 243-254. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3740338.
Rasmussen, Nicolas. “Plant Hormones in War and Peace: Science, Industry, and Government in the Development of Herbicides in 1940s America”, Isis, Vol. 92, No. 2 (2001): 291-316. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3080630.
Schmitz, David F. and Natalie Fousekis. “Frank Church, the Senate, and the Emergence of Dissent on the Vietnam War”, Pacific Historical Review, Vol. 63, No. 4 (1994): 561-581. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3639949.
Shapley, Deborah. “Herbicides: Agent Orange Stockpile May Go to the South Americans”, Science, New Series, Vol. 180, No. 4081 (1973): 43-45. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1735291.
Sodhy, Pamela. “The Malaysian Connection in the Vietnam War”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 9, No. 1 (1987): 38-53. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25797931.
Stanford Biology Study Group, “The Destruction of Indochina”, Instant Research on Peace and Violence, Vol. 2, No. 1 (1972): 2-8. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40724622.
Tran-Duc-Thao. “Vietnam and Eastern Asia”, The Far Eastern Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 4, French Indochina (1947): 409-413. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2049436.
Westing, Arthur H. “Ecological Effects of Military Defoliation on the Forests of South Vietnam”, BioScience, Vol. 21, No. 17 (1971): 893-898. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1295667.
One does wonder how some years have extreme infestations. I mean critter infestations are described in the Bible, so they can easily be dismissed as 'natural'.
Why do we have to get lice when we have showers and shampoos? We are educated and know how to keep lice away, yet now we have to resort to louse-combs and daily nit-checks, like a bunch of Victorians: all the children, and adults get them, in the whole town? Weird. The next year they are all gone again. BTW, that's never happened before, in my lifetime. You can't just blame that on lifestyle, because EVERYONE was affected.
Same with fleas. I have had pets die from flea infestations, despite chemical intervention. They were lined up vertically in giant patches. The fleas could not even move: there were thousands. And the cat just gave up. This year I find only a handful of fleas on my dog, which are dutifully removed, and none on the cats.
While we are here: what about the weatherbombs? Are we allowed to talk about manipulation?
In my other comment I quoted from a paper I wrote on Vietnam in college. I can tell you that, aside from herbicides like agent orange, we used many methods in attempts to destroy the Vietnamese. Rain-making was one of those methods, though it wasn't as effective as we'd hoped. It's just crazy that many still think rain-making is fantasy, yet we have officially disclosed that we did just that all over SE Asia in the 1960s-1970s. I'm sure it probably goes back further than that.
Have you tried starting a thread about it? South Australia has just been done and everyone was watching that system as it headed for the South Island (NZ).
However there has been a lot of chemtrail activity to the Northeast of the North Island. There were reports of a constant stream of flights heading out to the ocean. No-one had eyes on that litlle system, because of the monster that had just put SA under water that was crossing the Tasman.
The Northern baby will feed itself with moisture and hit the North Island next week.
Anyway, consider starting a thread with your information.
I wonder if it will remain up, because the conspiracy of weather bombing is still too rich for many to stomach.
I haven't thought about a thread, but I'd love to share more information I have on various topics. I spent most of 2017-2020 writing research papers, so I have plenty to start with.
Mosquitoes, Q. I was bit by one last summer. I live in the north and get bit by these things all the time. This Mosquitoe was different. It was black and had hair growing on its abdomen. I remember because I know what our local Mosquitoes look like. This things bite was awful I shot up a fever and the bite swelled up so much the tissues were splitting and oozing. I was in pain constantly for days. I kept icing it and drawing the fever out. I almost went to the doctor but I noticed the swelling going down. Jesus I hope I have developed immunity or my body has figured out what that thing was. But I have never seen this thing before. It was a Mosquitoe on steroids.
This was brought up during todays UN hearing. Russia claims US has been studying how to use lice and fleas as weapons in the Ukraine labs (among other things)
Worth a listen but the interpreter and background noise is so obviously fucked up to hat you can make anything out at times
I'm wondering if they messed with that. When I was listening live today, translation was clear as a bell. Just checked it out a few moments ago and can't hear interpreter at all. Russian delegate speaking at the time.
Been trying to wrap my head around the fact that in 1945 the US was the good guy. Then it seems to have flipped by 1950 and we the citizens became targets of multilayered threats by govt/cabal. (Extermination). The Nazi Op Paperclip is all i come up with as reason to go light to dark. But i think the explanation may be more nuanced.
It started with the third central bank getting established.
Antiparasitics work and are cheap.
That picture makes my head itch lol
They've moved to parasites, worms, mosquitoes and ticks
Don't hold back man. Tell us what you really think.
This topic made me go back and read a paper I wrote in college a few years ago on the use of herbicides in Vietnam. We've been in this business a LONG time:
"During the 1920's the United States took the lead in promoting international prohibitions of chemical and biological warfare. One effort, the 1922 Treaty of Washington outlawing ‘the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases’ was ratified by the U.S. Senate but rejected by France because of provisions, unrelated to chemical warfare, that placed strict limitations on submarines. The treaty never went into effect. In 1925 the United States tried again with the Geneva Protocol, which repeated the earlier ban on chemical weapons and added a prohibition of ‘bacteriological warfare.’ It was sent to the Senate in January 1926, where it met a returning wave of isolationism and a wall of opposition led by the American Legion and the American Chemical Society.”
"The first use of gas in World War I was not the German attack with chlorine in 1915 but a French attack in 1914-with tear gas."
In 1969-1970, "India, Mexico, Pakistan, Sweden and 17 other nations proposed in the General Assembly a resolution holding that the Geneva Protocol prohibits the use in war of all chemical agents directed at men, animals or plants. The resolution was passed by a vote of 80 to three, with 36 abstentions. Portugal, Australia and the U.S. voted against the resolution.”
"The U.S. Army manual The Law of Land Warfare, last issued in the 1950's, states that the Geneva Protocol is ‘not binding on this country’.”
I have 17 pages of research on this topic and it's all very disturbing to see how everything progressed. First, we used plant-growth regulators in the 1930's and 1940's to do positive things like increase the growth-rate for tomatoes by 300x. It only took a few years before we were using the same concept, but in reverse, to destroy plants. Fort Detrick was the main source for this research. Of course, the consequences were deadly to plants, animals, and humans alike. Lord help us.
wow. would love to study this further if you have an good source materials to point me to. tia
Here are all the sources I used for my paper:
Bazell, Robert J. “CBW Ban: Nixon Would Exclude Tear Gas and Herbicides”, Science, New Series, Vol. 172, No. 3980 (1971): 246-248. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1731029.
Bender, Gerald. “Correspondence”, Africa Today, Vol. 18, No. 3, China and Africa (1971): 106-107. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4185185.
Bennett, Ivan L. “The Significance of Chemical and Biological Warfare for the People”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 65, No. 1 (1970): 271-279. https://www.jstor.org/stable/59759.
Boffey, Philip M. Herbicides in Vietnam: AAAS Study Finds Widespread Devastation, Science, New Series, Vol. 171, No. 3966 (1971): 43-47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1731077.
Carlson, Elof Axel. “Commentary: International Symposium on Herbicides in the Vietnam War: An Appraisal”, Bioscience, Vol. 33, No. 8 (1983): 507-512. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1309140.
“Chemical and Biological Warfare”, Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Vol. 23, No. 4 (1970): 2-14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3823128.
Davis, Donald E. “Herbicides in Peace and War”, BioScience, Vol. 29, No. 2 (1979): 84+91-94. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1307743.
Huynh Kim Khanh. “Year One of Postcolonial Vietnam”, Southeast Asian Affairs (1977): 287-305. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27908323.
Johnstone, L. Craig. “Ecocide and the Geneva Protocol”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 49, No. 4 (1971): 711-720. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20037875.
Koppes, Clayton R. “Review: Agent Orange and the Official History of Vietnam”, Reviews in American History, Vol. 13, No. 1 (1985): 131-135. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2702023.
Langer, Elinor. “Chemical and Biological Warfare (I): The Research Program”, Science, New Series, Vol. 155, No. 3759 (1967): 174-179. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1721126.
Langer, Elinor. “Chemical and Biological Warfare (II): The Weapons and the Policies”, Science, New Series, Vol. 155, No. 3760 (1967): 299-303. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1720654.
Massey, Rachel. “The ‘Drug War’ in Colombia: Echoes of Vietnam”, Journal of Public Health Policy, Vol. 22, No. 3 (2001): 280-285. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3343142.
McClintock, Cynthia. “The War on Drugs: The Peruvian Case”, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, Vol. 30, No. 2/3 (1988): 127-142. https://www.jstor.org/stable/165983.
Meselson, Matthew S. “Chemical and Biological Weapons”, Scientific American, Vol. 222, No. 5 (1970): 15-25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/24925799.
Mody, Navroz. “Chemical Warfare in Vietnam”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 5, No. 24 (1970): 948-949. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4360110.
Ng Shui Meng. “Vietnam in Perspective”, Southeast Asian Affairs (1975): 201-211. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27908257.
Norman, A.G. “Studies on Plant Growth-Regulating Substances”, Botanical Gazette, Vol. 107, No. 4 (1946): 475. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2472679.
Norman, Colin. “Vietnam’s Herbicide Legacy”, Science, New Series, Vol. 219, No. 4589 (1983): 1196-1197. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1690665.
Peterson, Gale E. “The Discovery and Development of 2,4-D”, Agricultural History, Vol. 41, No. 3 (1967): 243-254. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3740338.
Rasmussen, Nicolas. “Plant Hormones in War and Peace: Science, Industry, and Government in the Development of Herbicides in 1940s America”, Isis, Vol. 92, No. 2 (2001): 291-316. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3080630.
Schmitz, David F. and Natalie Fousekis. “Frank Church, the Senate, and the Emergence of Dissent on the Vietnam War”, Pacific Historical Review, Vol. 63, No. 4 (1994): 561-581. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3639949.
Shapley, Deborah. “Herbicides: Agent Orange Stockpile May Go to the South Americans”, Science, New Series, Vol. 180, No. 4081 (1973): 43-45. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1735291.
Sodhy, Pamela. “The Malaysian Connection in the Vietnam War”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 9, No. 1 (1987): 38-53. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25797931.
Stanford Biology Study Group, “The Destruction of Indochina”, Instant Research on Peace and Violence, Vol. 2, No. 1 (1972): 2-8. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40724622.
Stone, Richard. “Agent Orange’s Bitter Harvest”, Science, New Series, Vol. 315, No. 5809 (2007): 176-179. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20035179.
Tschirley, Fred H. “Defoliation in Vietnam”, Science, New Series, Vol. 163, No. 3869 (1969): 779-786. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1726473.
Tran-Duc-Thao. “Vietnam and Eastern Asia”, The Far Eastern Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 4, French Indochina (1947): 409-413. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2049436.
Westing, Arthur H. “Ecological Effects of Military Defoliation on the Forests of South Vietnam”, BioScience, Vol. 21, No. 17 (1971): 893-898. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1295667.
Hmmm.
One does wonder how some years have extreme infestations. I mean critter infestations are described in the Bible, so they can easily be dismissed as 'natural'.
Why do we have to get lice when we have showers and shampoos? We are educated and know how to keep lice away, yet now we have to resort to louse-combs and daily nit-checks, like a bunch of Victorians: all the children, and adults get them, in the whole town? Weird. The next year they are all gone again. BTW, that's never happened before, in my lifetime. You can't just blame that on lifestyle, because EVERYONE was affected.
Same with fleas. I have had pets die from flea infestations, despite chemical intervention. They were lined up vertically in giant patches. The fleas could not even move: there were thousands. And the cat just gave up. This year I find only a handful of fleas on my dog, which are dutifully removed, and none on the cats.
While we are here: what about the weatherbombs? Are we allowed to talk about manipulation?
In my other comment I quoted from a paper I wrote on Vietnam in college. I can tell you that, aside from herbicides like agent orange, we used many methods in attempts to destroy the Vietnamese. Rain-making was one of those methods, though it wasn't as effective as we'd hoped. It's just crazy that many still think rain-making is fantasy, yet we have officially disclosed that we did just that all over SE Asia in the 1960s-1970s. I'm sure it probably goes back further than that.
Have you tried starting a thread about it? South Australia has just been done and everyone was watching that system as it headed for the South Island (NZ).
However there has been a lot of chemtrail activity to the Northeast of the North Island. There were reports of a constant stream of flights heading out to the ocean. No-one had eyes on that litlle system, because of the monster that had just put SA under water that was crossing the Tasman.
The Northern baby will feed itself with moisture and hit the North Island next week.
Anyway, consider starting a thread with your information.
I wonder if it will remain up, because the conspiracy of weather bombing is still too rich for many to stomach.
I haven't thought about a thread, but I'd love to share more information I have on various topics. I spent most of 2017-2020 writing research papers, so I have plenty to start with.
I am looking forward to it.
Where are you located?
New Zealand
Might also explain the tick situation in some regions.
Grew up in the country did nit see one tick my entire life in the woods around my home. Past couple years it's a virtual guarantee I'll be bitten.
If they were good enough for the black plague they should be good enough for whatever Fauxi has planned.
Bill Gates and his mosquitos?
Mosquitoes, Q. I was bit by one last summer. I live in the north and get bit by these things all the time. This Mosquitoe was different. It was black and had hair growing on its abdomen. I remember because I know what our local Mosquitoes look like. This things bite was awful I shot up a fever and the bite swelled up so much the tissues were splitting and oozing. I was in pain constantly for days. I kept icing it and drawing the fever out. I almost went to the doctor but I noticed the swelling going down. Jesus I hope I have developed immunity or my body has figured out what that thing was. But I have never seen this thing before. It was a Mosquitoe on steroids.
Can you provide more info? I am curious about this.
This was brought up during todays UN hearing. Russia claims US has been studying how to use lice and fleas as weapons in the Ukraine labs (among other things)
Worth a listen but the interpreter and background noise is so obviously fucked up to hat you can make anything out at times
I'm wondering if they messed with that. When I was listening live today, translation was clear as a bell. Just checked it out a few moments ago and can't hear interpreter at all. Russian delegate speaking at the time.