The Atlantic: Nuclear war would be TERRIBLE for climate change, never mind the people
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (13)
sorted by:
Wait, we are causing climate change so wiping us out would be a good thing for the climate. I wish they would get their facts straight.
Those pesky facts are always getting in the way.
THIS is the TRUE message.
Can't have Global Warming with everything dropping into a nuclear ice age.
No one will care about climate change anymore, because survival would be the game. A few days of bombardment, followed by a few weeks of nuclear fallout, followed by a few months to years of a nuclear winter.
followed by decades of depression, which they claim is good for cancelling climate change.
This is comms talking about how an explosion of information (release of blackmail) will kill their chances at preventing climate change (a change to their Globalist climate, an end to the NWO).
Climate Change = Resistance to the NWO
Carbon Emissions = Conspiracy Talk (Dirty Air)
Nuclear = Explosive Information, aka Blackmail that can level a Nation
Nuclear War = Everyone releasing their blackmail on each-other to get reduced sentences / avoid the death penalty AKA Mutually Assured Destruction.
https://greatawakening.win/p/141YIjZIIN/3--thinking-in-symbols-climate-c/
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/01/30/comms-list-short-placeholders/
Shave the whales!
Well, you gotta have priorities. 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
If the world starts a nuclear war, the weather will not be on anyone's mind, it will be the least of our problems
But, please remember to socially distance.
These people are completely disconnected from reality.