It's because you choose to engage with someone who will never admit to being wrong about anything. Ever.
I remember getting caught up in a conversation with him when he was "TheQStrategy" and he said that the economy was going to collapse last summer.
Then, all of a sudden, he deleted his account.
I know you like to talk with him in good faith, but as you're already aware, it's kind of pointless. In his world, he is never wrong, he is the only human being who has never made a mistake.
I do enjoy watching you try though, because I can always predict his reaction. It's like watching a playbook in narcissism.
Are individuals inaccurate while aggregates are accurate?
I liked him more when he was Quelle.
Also love following these conversations though I find it better not to engage with zel, I leave that to the man with the patience of a saint. Not that I care about his mass-downvoting of post history, more about him reporting people to protect his world view.
I said it was potentially a photoshop. I rarely claim absolute knowledge of anything.
The last time I tried to source that was in 2009, so I’m glad something came up in the meantime. You provided the source.
I analyzed it. Which is what you do when provided the source. I found it to be lacking, asked you to explain why you found the evidence to he convincing despite its objective problems, and received no clarification.
The mere fact that a source exists is step 1 in verifying a source. Please don’t get pissy that successfully fulfilling step 1 of demonstrating the validity of your claim is not enough to convince me of it’s credibility after I proceed to step 2.
I can tell by the writing style that it's him. Also, not to play armchair psychologist, but it would seem that NPD is the reason he follows you around. It's based on a person's insecurities.
Eh, I don’t like to armchair diagnose. He has his worldview and it’s as real to him as mine is to me. I don’t fault him his passion. The world would genuinely be terrifying and frustrating if I believed what he did and found the world as unconvinced as it appears to be despite the efforts he puts forth. It would be frustrating for anyone.
Sorry Ogre, I typically agree with you, but you're wrong on this one. It is the most blatantly obvious thing about him. I lived with someone that had NPD, and Zeitreise is textbook, and I mean textbook NPD.
You know how you can tell if someone has NPD? They don't see anything wrong with it. In fact, they might actually admit it. And anytime I've stated it about him (and I said the same to QStrat), he's never refuted it.
You're being far too generous if you're just listening to him as if he was the same as the majority of Qs here.
Clothes are just the Man’s way of telling you to be uncomfortable with God’s image. If you aren’t naked, you’re just a slave to the standards of propriety set forth by those in power as a means of selling you things they’ve convinced you that you need. God never claimed you needed clothing. Covering yourself was evidence of sin in Genesis.
Take the red pill. Accept the image in which you were made by God. Reject clothing.
It's because you choose to engage with someone who will never admit to being wrong about anything. Ever.
I remember getting caught up in a conversation with him when he was "TheQStrategy" and he said that the economy was going to collapse last summer.
Then, all of a sudden, he deleted his account.
I know you like to talk with him in good faith, but as you're already aware, it's kind of pointless. In his world, he is never wrong, he is the only human being who has never made a mistake.
I do enjoy watching you try though, because I can always predict his reaction. It's like watching a playbook in narcissism.
As I said earlier, I enjoy watching you two have conversations, so every now and then I like to pop in and see what you two are discussing.
Are individuals inaccurate while aggregates are accurate?
I liked him more when he was Quelle.
Also love following these conversations though I find it better not to engage with zel, I leave that to the man with the patience of a saint. Not that I care about his mass-downvoting of post history, more about him reporting people to protect his world view.
Ding, ding, ding. Exactly. Zei will literally chase all your comments in your history like it's his goddamn job. It's sad, but fun to play with.
I said it was potentially a photoshop. I rarely claim absolute knowledge of anything.
The last time I tried to source that was in 2009, so I’m glad something came up in the meantime. You provided the source.
I analyzed it. Which is what you do when provided the source. I found it to be lacking, asked you to explain why you found the evidence to he convincing despite its objective problems, and received no clarification.
The mere fact that a source exists is step 1 in verifying a source. Please don’t get pissy that successfully fulfilling step 1 of demonstrating the validity of your claim is not enough to convince me of it’s credibility after I proceed to step 2.
I can tell by the writing style that it's him. Also, not to play armchair psychologist, but it would seem that NPD is the reason he follows you around. It's based on a person's insecurities.
Eh, I don’t like to armchair diagnose. He has his worldview and it’s as real to him as mine is to me. I don’t fault him his passion. The world would genuinely be terrifying and frustrating if I believed what he did and found the world as unconvinced as it appears to be despite the efforts he puts forth. It would be frustrating for anyone.
Sorry Ogre, I typically agree with you, but you're wrong on this one. It is the most blatantly obvious thing about him. I lived with someone that had NPD, and Zeitreise is textbook, and I mean textbook NPD.
You know how you can tell if someone has NPD? They don't see anything wrong with it. In fact, they might actually admit it. And anytime I've stated it about him (and I said the same to QStrat), he's never refuted it.
You're being far too generous if you're just listening to him as if he was the same as the majority of Qs here.
Clothes are just the Man’s way of telling you to be uncomfortable with God’s image. If you aren’t naked, you’re just a slave to the standards of propriety set forth by those in power as a means of selling you things they’ve convinced you that you need. God never claimed you needed clothing. Covering yourself was evidence of sin in Genesis.
Take the red pill. Accept the image in which you were made by God. Reject clothing.
:)