And thanks for not answering my question. Since my historical understanding of Switzerland comports with its neutrality, I have no further curiosity when you fail to substantiate your remark.
Just annoyance. You can't spare a simple sentence to give me a clue as to what you are thinking---but you give me a research assignment instead. I'm sorry if my life does not have the time to fulfill your research assignments. To return the favor, your oblique response shows how much you are really willing to alleviate ignorance.
I'm sorry if my life does not have the time to fulfill your research assignments.
This is the key issue. You assume everyone else has the time to teach you. What of their schedules....or do they not factor into your equations of information requirements?
Look, I gave you a lead to follow. If you wanted to know more about it, as all truth seekers would, then there ya go....no problem. What I find, however, is people profess to be truthseekers when in fact they're only here to sponge off the ones who really are. You want the truth, then find it. I'll not be someone's hand-maid through their journey---that's up to them.
Don't be absurd. You can't write a sentence? If you know your material, you can always condense it into a few sentences to get the main point across. And wait for questions. The fact that you go on like this only shows that you have plenty of time for a few sentences.
As far as I am concerned, there is no reason to doubt that Switzerland fulfills the description of "neutral." You said "no." I asked why you said no---and you couldn't be bothered to answer. So, fine. I'm not that curious, if you are not that dedicated to your point of view, I'm willing to take that as an answer.
And thanks for not answering my question. Since my historical understanding of Switzerland comports with its neutrality, I have no further curiosity when you fail to substantiate your remark.
I wont entertain your jab, as in itself reveals much of who you are to everyone here by your own doing.
Ignorance must truly be bliss, as the saying goes. Good day.
Just annoyance. You can't spare a simple sentence to give me a clue as to what you are thinking---but you give me a research assignment instead. I'm sorry if my life does not have the time to fulfill your research assignments. To return the favor, your oblique response shows how much you are really willing to alleviate ignorance.
This is the key issue. You assume everyone else has the time to teach you. What of their schedules....or do they not factor into your equations of information requirements?
Look, I gave you a lead to follow. If you wanted to know more about it, as all truth seekers would, then there ya go....no problem. What I find, however, is people profess to be truthseekers when in fact they're only here to sponge off the ones who really are. You want the truth, then find it. I'll not be someone's hand-maid through their journey---that's up to them.
Don't be absurd. You can't write a sentence? If you know your material, you can always condense it into a few sentences to get the main point across. And wait for questions. The fact that you go on like this only shows that you have plenty of time for a few sentences.
As far as I am concerned, there is no reason to doubt that Switzerland fulfills the description of "neutral." You said "no." I asked why you said no---and you couldn't be bothered to answer. So, fine. I'm not that curious, if you are not that dedicated to your point of view, I'm willing to take that as an answer.